User talk:Narotham tripuraneni

Welcome!

Hello, Narotham tripuraneni, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JNW (talk) 15:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Narotham tripuraneni. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. JNW (talk) 15:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JNW. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JNW (talk) 15:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. JNW (talk) 15:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JNW (talk) 15:32, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tripuraneni Maharadhi. Disruptive editing, not heeding multiple warnings - Mlpearc (open channel) 15:43, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tripuraneni Maharadhi. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:14, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Narotham tripuraneni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I havent done any disruptive editing, please unblock me I will provide the right citations, I am just learning to edit on wikipedia only recently, please understand the situation

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Superseded by the new request below. Please, do not make more than one unblock request at the same time. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The bulk of your edits are to the Tripuraneni Maharadhi article, which may be a conflict of interest. The primary concern is that despite multiple warnings, you have continued to make inappropriate changes to this page, including but not limited to repeated additions of unsourced material. To continue to make such change without reviewing the guidelines provided here on your talk page is disruptive on several levels. If unblocked, please advise which articles you intend to change, what changes you intend to make exactly, what what sources you will be citing. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:02, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Narotham tripuraneni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See sir maybe I am not adept with wikipedia , so a miscommunication could have happened. There will not be any issue with the neutrality of the subject. Also I have a wide knowledge on ancient Indian topics and European History which I would like to edit in future as a wikipedian. as far as the article maharadhi tripuraneni is concerned, a lot of vandalism is happening concerning the page. He is a famous person in the Telugu fraternity so I was protecting his page in the best interests only but you have been blocking me sir. Please do send me some information onto how to cite perfectly on wikipedia. I will provide news articles as citations and tangible sources only. you can be assured of that. You can keep the page semi protected. its better actually but give me a chance to do the edit properly with perfection in citations. Thanks

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is a collaborative project. That means changes to articles need to be discussed when they are challenged. Not only did you repeatedly fail to discuss your changes, but your unblock request appears to indicate that you still do not see why this was problematic. I am therefore declining this appeal. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stop posting identical copies of the same unblock request, and just be patient and wait - we're all volunteers here, and it's a weekend and most of us have other priorities. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is Tripuraneni Maharadhi your grandfather? Doug Weller talk 10:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]