User talk:Namexre

This is Namexre's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hi Namexre! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ziad Sakr (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

All inline links should be removed, please, and turned into references if appropriate, Wikilinks, or external links in a section so named. See Wikipedia:External links Please read WP:REFB and WP:CITE

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ziad Sakr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:48, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namexre! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:48, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ziad Sakr (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by LittlePuppers were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

First, we need to see in-depth coverage of him in secondary sources to establish that he's notable. Second, this is currently written in a very promotional tone, not an encyclopedic one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ziad Sakr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LittlePuppers (talk) 19:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ziad Sakr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ziad Sakr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ziad Sakr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KeepItGoingForward (talk) 01:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ziad Sakr

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ziad Sakr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ziad Sakr. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 01:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You expressed your opinion about the article Ziad Sakr in the deletion discussion, very forcefully, but you found that consensus was against you. However strongly you may personally feel that the consensus at that discussion was mistaken, it is time to accept that it was the consensus, and move on. Over the course of my time contributing to Wikipedia, I don't know how many times I have had to accept a decision which I have believed was wrong, but I have achieved much more of the things which I think are right by leaving the ones where consensus has been against me, and, rather than waste my time on futile attempts to overturn those consensuses, moving on to other things where I have a chance of success. I advise you to do the same; if you don't, not only will you have a frustrating time, but you are also likely to be blocked from editing by an administrator. JBW (talk) 10:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have now looked at the rest of your editing history. It's a pity I didn't do so earlier, as I could have avoided spending the time it took me to write my message above, as you clearly don't have the remotest intention of doing anything on Wikipedia other than using it to promote and publicise Ziad Sakr. You have even said that you are trying to use Wikipedia to raise Ziad Sakr's position on Google. Wikipedia is not for promoting, advertising, or publicising anything or anyone, and continuing to try to use it for that purpose is very likely to get you blocked from editing. JBW (talk) 10:47, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no furstration or force in my responses. Actually, your response is very passive aggressive, and I advise you to use proper language when speaking. Thanks Namexre (talk) 19:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And there is nothing personal taken here. It is not a big deal for me as an editor. This is all coming from your assumptions. I am given this person what he deserves, as it is given to other squash professional players on Wikipedia with similar achievements. That is really it. Namexre (talk) 19:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 22:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]