User talk:NW49ERSFAN24

Welcome!

Hi NW49ERSFAN24! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Megaman en m (talk) 15:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Aspirin—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:49, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ibuprofen. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:49, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, I'm DMacks. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 01:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Armodafinil, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 11:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 10:26, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As multiple other editors have stated, you need to cite a WP:MEDRS source. And lying in your edit-summary is not ever allowed, but instead will make it more likely nobody will take your ideas seriously. DMacks (talk) 10:27, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks I'm sorry I didn't understand the rules . I was just citing under my education experience and the pharmacokinetics of phenibut and its addiction liability and its dependence liability and even do also to proof in the full definition of phenibut in Wikipedia itself. NW49ERSFAN24 (talk) 11:25, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]