Jump to content

User talk:Mz7/June–August 2021

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Invitation for Functionary consultation 2021

Greetings,

I'm letting you know in advance about a meeting I'd like to invite you to regarding the Universal Code of Conduct and the community's ownership of its future enforcement. I'm still in the process of putting together the details, but I wanted to share the date with you: 27 June, 2021. I do not have a time on this date yet, but I will let you soon. We have created a meta page with basic information. Please take a look at the meta page and sign up your name under the appropriate section.

Thank you for your time.--BAnand (WMF) 15:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Mz7,

New editor Sulehaido requested the undeletion of protected article Haido buhari which was basically a one line article written by Haido buhari or his socks. Could you do a quick check? Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 21:49, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

@Liz: Yep, that's them. I've blocked the account. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 07:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello there!

Hello @Mz7:! The current IP user User:49.149.72.236 has been edited the Wikipedia page of Cathay Pacific fleet, Cebgo and other wiki page. Seems this IP user is the current user of sockpuppet yesterday User:Philippine 1812. Can you help me with this? Thanks for your help! Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 07:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

@Cornerstone2.0: I've blocked the IP. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 07:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

@Mz7: Thanks! Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 07:44, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

@Mz7: hi there! I have a major changes of Virgin Atlantic in the fleet section. I remove it all and transfer to directly view the Virgin Atlantic fleet from recently a #redirect. Hope you approve and understand me. Thanks! Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 15:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

20:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

User:Jr Tahun

Hi, I am not exactly sure what to do. Back in May you blocked this user for repeated additions of unsourced content. This activity is still continuing today. What do I do in this scenario? Here are some examples [7] [8], this one he "fake cited" [9] and so forth. I have left warnings on their talk page with no replies. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:13, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

@Sportsfan 1234: I've warned the user one last time. If they continue to add unsourced content, let me know, and I may block their account again. Mz7 (talk) 17:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

Administrator changes

added AshleyyoursmileLess Unless
removed HusondMattWadeMJCdetroitCariocaVague RantKingboykThunderboltzGwen GaleAniMateSlimVirgin (deceased)

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

Arbitration


Sorry, thank you

Hi Mz7, sorry about the malformed SPI report. Thanks for moving it to the right place, and it's helpful to know not to request CU for IP reports – it makes sense, and I've seen the note in the SPI intro, but I never really got it until now. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 05:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

IP socking

Hi Mz7, you blocked Special:Contributions/70.187.171.236 for one month back in March as a sock per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Extrapolaris. The IP is active once again on several of the same articles as before the block. Do I need to file an SPI again, or can you block based on the previous report? A new report would be largely identical to the previous one. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 18:19, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

BilCat, thanks for letting me know. I've blocked the IP again for another three months. Best, Mz7 (talk) 21:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
And thank you. BilCat (talk) 02:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Sambandam

Shocking is back in Sambandam by the same person after protection expired. 2402:3A80:502:5898:0:63:67A5:3B01 (talk) 19:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm 1TWO3Writer. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, User:Haido buhari, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

1TWO3Writer (talk) 13:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

20:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet case

Hello, Mz7,

I see you are traveling but if you have a second, please give Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Walter Ezequiel Matthysse Jr. a look. Thanks and safe travels! Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

@Liz:  Done, thanks! Mz7 (talk) 00:12, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Many thanks! Have a great vacation. Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Enjoy your vacation! --TheSandDoctor Talk 05:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Roshan Sitara

It looks like you deleted and salted Roshan_Sitara back in April due to repeated recreation. I do not know the content of the recreated article, but it may match Roshan sitara that was created a week ago. BOVINEBOY2008 15:32, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

@Bovineboy2008: Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The user that recreated this new article is indeed a sockpuppet of the previous accounts that created the previously salted title. (The relevant SPI case is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bttowadch.) I've blocked the relevant accounts and deleted this new iteration. Thanks again, Mz7 (talk) 06:04, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Harry Potter Alliance logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Harry Potter Alliance logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

15:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Nonsense pages

This is regarding the socks you just blocked. Using [17], I was able to locate [18], which is another creation of this same person. Are we able to use the title blacklist or something to contain this person's various creations? It's always the exact same stuff as shown in the pastebin file. Home Lander (talk) 22:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Also found [19] and [20]. Home Lander (talk) 22:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
@Home Lander: Sorry for the delay in responding. I have placed an IP block on 2001:861:3206:2c0::/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) that I think may help in this case (no comment from a CU perspective, of course, but behaviorally that IP range is responsible for a few of the problematic drafts that you linked). I'm not sure the title blacklist would help in this case, but I think the edit filter might; if the problem continues, you could request one at Wikipedia:Edit filter/Requested. Best of luck, Mz7 (talk) 20:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Mz7, requested. Appreciate your help, let me know here or there if you have any other thoughts. Home Lander (talk) 19:44, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AC Arles-Avignon - Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AC Arles-Avignon - Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Since it closed I could open another report but I'm pretty confident that SaraKab is another sock. Notfrompedro (talk) 23:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

@Notfrompedro: Thanks, I blocked it. Mz7 (talk) 23:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Remove sources

Hi, why did you remove sources from capture of Fez (1554) ? Pikachu5D (talk) 16:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Check talk page... Pikachu5D (talk) 16:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

And why did you block me ? I bring sources for it. Pikachu5D (talk) 16:43, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

@Pikachu5D: I personally have no view about how the article should be written. On Wikipedia, we have a rule which prohibits editors from repeatedly reversing each other's edits. Instead of repeatedly undoing the edits other editors, you should engage in discussion on the article's talk page and come to an agreement before editing the article again. You were blocked because you persistently reverted other editors without first coming to an agreement with other editors on the article's talk page. Mz7 (talk) 16:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

16:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
  • This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

Click here to opt out of any future messages.

--Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
  • An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.

Technical news

  • IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

Arbitration


17:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Mz7:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

15:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

Orphaned non-free image File:Tokyo 2020 mascot candidate pair B.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tokyo 2020 mascot candidate pair B.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tokyo 2020 mascot candidate pair C.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tokyo 2020 mascot candidate pair C.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

21:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Mz7,

Could you review the latest addition to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Srahmadi? You blocked and then unblocked editor Saff V. and now they are once again blocked as a sockpuppet and all their page creations tagged for deletion based on "a tip". Since you reviewed them in April, I was hoping you could confirm this. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Liz. Back in April, I was specifically looking for whether Saff V was connected to the account Ghazaalch (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)—eventually, I determined that there is no connection between Saff V and Ghazaalch. It appears that as of today there are new developments which indicate that Saff V. is a sockpuppet of someone else (i.e. not Ghazaalch). Since it doesn't look like Ghazaalch is involved in the new developments, it looks like nothing here contradicts the result of my April investigation. I haven't actually looked at the underlying data involved in the new developments, but I was wondering whether this explanation resolves your concerns? If you would like, I could email CaptainEek to ask for clarification on their block. Mz7 (talk) 02:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.

Technical news

  • Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


20:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Warning

Hi @Mz7:, If new IP or Registered users add vandalic content in any BLP on their first edit then which level of Warning is used. Please answer me.Damak15 (talk) 05:51, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Damak15. Usually you can start with level 1 using {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}, but if the vandalism is particularly egregious, you can skip levels and go directly to 2 or 3 or even directly to level 4. If you go directly to level 4, you can use the template {{subst:uw-vandalism4im}} ("4im" meaning "level 4-immediate"). Use your best judgment. For more information, see the guidance at Wikipedia:Vandalism#For beginners. Mz7 (talk) 05:55, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Ok, but if New IP or Registered user didn't make any disruptive, vandalism and test edit on their first edit and makes vandalic edits on their 5 or 4 or 2 edits or after serveral months then which level we use.Damak15 (talk) 06:00, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

@Damak15: There aren't really any rigid rules here. Simply use the level you think is best. Always read the template warning before you send it to make sure that the message it contains is what you mean to send. Mz7 (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

16:19, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:COSI Columbus logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:COSI Columbus logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Our old F1 editing friend

Back again here and has been for a few weeks it seems. 'Master' was User:Rowde. Previous socks:

Thanks; best regards, Eagleash (talk) 13:49, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

@Eagleash: Ah yes, that does look quite familiar.  Blocked and tagged. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:49, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Many thanks! Eagleash (talk) 09:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Sock tag removals

Did I mess something up here and here?-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:16, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

@Ponyo: I apologize in advance because the situation here is a little difficult to explain. Basically, you didn't mess anything up, but there is some new information that questions whether these accounts are CU-confirmed to the account Excel23 specifically.
At the time you placed those tags, you had correctly confirmed that those two accounts (SugarHiller and TexasToasters) were the same user as JuiceGrind (among other accounts). The problem was, at the time, JuiceGrind had incorrectly been tagged as a CU-confirmed sockpuppet of the user Excel23—because of this, you tagged SugarHiller and TexasToasters as CU-confirmed socks of Excel23. Currently, it's no longer clear whether JuiceGrind et al. are actually related to Excel23. This is because of a technical issue with the CU tool that falsely made it seem like Excel23 was confirmed to a bunch of accounts—you can see some discussion at the relevant SPI case (which is very long and confusing; sorry about that).
In other words, the current situation is that the following accounts are  Confirmed to each other but are Red X Unrelated to Excel23:
If we want to re-tag these accounts, we could tag them under JuiceGrind, which is the oldest account of these five. Again, I apologize for the confusion. Mz7 (talk) 04:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Ah, I completely understand. In fact, I must have anticipated there could an issue with confirming the accounts to Excel23, which is why I specifically noted the connection between SugarHiller and TexasToasters to specific accounts tagged as Excel socks in my edit summaries instead of just leaving the Excel123 sock tags with the generic edit summary "tag". I left myself a crumb trail. I'll retag the accounts as JuiceGrind socks as it may be useful down the road.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 15:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

19:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello

Komachichuu is stealing content on FANDOM, DeviantArt and YouTube! Would you please block this user on Wikipedia for infinite: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Komachichuu

21:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Read-only reminder

A maintenance operation will be performed on Wednesday August 25 06:00 UTC. It should only last for a few minutes.

Also during this time, operations on the CentralAuth will not be possible (GlobalRenames, changing/confirming e-mail addresses, logging into new wikis, password changes).

For more details about the operation and on all impacted services, please check on Phabricator.

A banner will be displayed 30 minutes before the operation.

Please help your community to be aware of this maintenance operation. Thank you!

20:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

Hi

Hi ➤ Tajwar – thesupermaN! 【Click to Discuss】 05:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

15:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi , I have one question ? Hamaredha (talk) 15:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC)