User talk:Myxxd

Image tagging for Image:410QB4ZEDQL. SL210 .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:410QB4ZEDQL. SL210 .jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:1694 a.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1694 a.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Sia-cd2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sia-cd2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Fww-oz-small.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Fww-oz-small.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Helpful One ^(Talk)^{(Contribs) (Review)} 19:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fww-oz-small.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Fww-oz-small.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. The Helpful One ^(Talk)^{(Contribs) (Review)} 19:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ihad+sits.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ihad+sits.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Aaocd2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aaocd2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:41GWSFJB2GL. SL210 .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:41GWSFJB2GL. SL210 .jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:72 b 0.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:72 b 0.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Image010.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Image010.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Allow Us to Be Frank has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO ^Hail! 15:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~The recent edit you made to World of Our Own constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks.~~ · AndonicO ^Hail! 15:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry. · AndonicO ^Hail! 15:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Cover D1mtqdgfRj0O.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cover D1mtqdgfRj0O.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Face to Face (Westlife album). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 17:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Usagainsttheworldartwork.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Usagainsttheworldartwork.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Uatwcdcover2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Uatwcdcover2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Westlife

I've noticed your edits on Westlife and I am concerned about your edits, as follows:

The reason why the opening sentences were put into one paragraph was to meet GA article nomination. Read the talk page for more information.

You edits made the article sound like a for-fans read. Wikipedia:Avoid_peacock_terms

Guest Appearances
- Given that the band has been together for 10 years, they are bound to have numerous TV apperances and it's not possible to list all of them

Official Merchandise/PC and PS Games/Accessories
- These will be removed immediately as it constitute Advertisement.

Record Breakers
- They can't have the most UK no.1 if 2 other bands beat them.

--Cahk (talk) 09:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edits

I've reviewed edits you made related to Westlife. Besides the earlier talk post I made in reverting some of your edits, I want to remind you that alot of your edits are based on you being a fan of the band. However, Wiki is not for advertising nor is it a fan group.

Word choices should be netural, for example: World of Our Own (song) - "only because of the insistent demand of fans"

Album names: or "TLA", F2F, etc. They are not officially used by BMG UK/Ireland nor by Sony Music and thus should be removed.

Lacking sources: Edits you made do not have citations, they are necessary for chart positions (See Westlife Talk page)

You need to tag images that you uploaded or the Bot will remove it. See Template:Album_rationale

--Cahk (talk) 09:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Continuous edits on Westlife

I would suggest you strongly to read the talk page of Westlife, under the section of failed GA nomination. You've added information that was exactly taken out for the purpose of making the article a GA candidate-hopeful.

I've reverted some of the edits you've made. --Cahk (talk) 20:12, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Westlife Tours

As I've put the {{splitsection}} tag on the tour section on the website for more than a week with no contests, I've split the tour section into a new article, Westlife Tours. The Westlife article is getting way too big and editing is getting increasingly difficult which is why I split it. Keep up the good work!! --Cahk (talk) 00:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Face To Face Tour

A tag has been placed on Face To Face Tour requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Closedmouth (talk) 15:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Back Home DVD.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Back Home DVD.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Westlife-related articles

I am not sure if you noticed it or not, but your recent edits on different Westlife related articles caused words to all bunched up on one side. For example, Face to Face (Westlife album), Sony BMG Entertainment became Sony BMGEntertainment and 2006in Australia. I've checked and it has nothing to do with the typing, so I suggest you look into that and see what you've done to cause that issue.

Also (just the title):

--Cahk (talk) 03:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. The Evil Spartan (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Westlife

Thanks for correcting those articles. However, The Love Album is another one that needs to be fixed.--Cahk (talk) 11:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Back Home DVD.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Back Home DVD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Westlife

Hi there again, I wanted to let you know if you add citations to the Westlife article, could you please follow the general format for all the citations? This is for convenient sake should someone decide to ask for promotion of the article to GA standing, at which point, all the citations needs to be in the format that I've changed for the article.

Also, the use of non-english references are strongly discouraged in English Wikipedia and generally speaking, fan sites (ie. Westlife.cn should also be avoided if possible) --Cahk (talk) 21:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Westlife

Hi. There's no need for a picture to be placed at every sub section. Also, I've reszied several pictures so that the article length is well controlled. --Longyuano (talk) 11:27, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Westlife (album)

There's no need to repeat the tracklistings for the different album versions. Just add in footnotes to highlight the difference. Also, I've done edits to the opening texts and other portions of the page so please if you wish to undo stuff, do that to the specific area that you have in mind.

Westlife

It is still far from GA. Do all the things on my list before renominating it. When i say the lead is shocking i mean poorly written not factually inaccurate. Its also not long enough. Realist2 (talk) 17:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expand the lead by summarising the groups actual career, what actually happened not just the sales figures. As long as what you add to the lead is already sourced in the content of the article you dont need to find sources for it as well. Expand the Mcfadden departure stuff. And remove these 1 line paragraph sentances, put them together. Realist2 (talk) 17:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Next remove the sub headings that are album names, you want to have there album career split into two or three sections not 12, i like the old age (with mcfadden), new age (without mcfadden) idea but thats only two splits. Really it needs 3. Think about that as your next step. Realist2 (talk) 19:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You need to scrap the world record stuff at the bottom, its not in the record books so cant be official world records. Realist2 (talk) 05:06, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, those 4 headings at the bottom, delete them and adding the links instead to the "see also" section. Realist2 (talk) 12:24, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the singles of westlife is their most important achievement. Make sure every #1 singles is mentioned in the content.... sources included. Then also source the table or number #1 singles as well. Additionally add some of the beginning parts of the new age section to the mcfadden departure section. You can then point out that Westlife wasnt damaged by his departure. Many groups finish when someone quits. Realist2 (talk) 13:49, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Westlife

I've tagged a fact tag to the Westlife's article in regards to them being "5th as the best selling artist of the 21st century". Please find a source to back up that claim.--Cahk (talk) 09:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing the source. Note that the article has been nominated for GA once again so you might want to head over to the talk page and see comments left there.--Cahk (talk) 11:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Westlife discography, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Nappymonster (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop adding multiple spam links on Westlife related articles. Links to the Facebook account, message boards, ect on songs which the links have no direct link to is against Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links TubularWorld (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Westlife songwriters

I have nominated Westlife songwriters, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westlife songwriters. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 14:01, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:7138813x.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:7138813x.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not copy and paste from other websites

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Westlife article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page.

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sia-ep.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Sia-ep.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits and edit summary

Looking through your edits, I notice a pattern of you marking edits as being minor and not using an edit summary. Please read through Help:Minor edit and make sure all of the edits you mark as minor are minor edits. This for example, [1], is not a minor edit. Please read through Help: Edit summary and provide an edit summary with each of your edits, so other editors know why you made a certain edit. Aspects (talk) 17:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So seven months later and you are making the exact same sort of edits such as this one, [2], since this edit is clearly not a minor edit. Please read through WP:WEASEL since your edit added weasel words to the article. Aspects (talk) 17:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What About Now (Daughtry song) edits

I have noticed you reverting some of my reverts of your edits. Per WP:BRD, you need to discuss instead of continually reverting. For the date format, please see the discussion at Talk:What About Now (Daughtry song)#Date format. You also keep adding the Westlife navigational template that is not necessary on the song page because it is not linked in the template. Because there is a Westlife singles template, only that template should be used on the song pages. Aspects (talk) 17:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wonderland (band)

A tag has been placed on Wonderland (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 13:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Westlife

Hello, Myxxd. You have new messages at Talk:Where We Are.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Myxxd. You have new messages at Talk:Where We Are Tour.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I've also noticed that there are consistant issues with other Westlife related articles that you edit which match the issues above. Consistantly claims are main in Westlife articles for example Back Home (Westlife album) makes the claim "It was also the fifth best selling album in the UK for 2007 with 854 344" with no source and there is an almost completely unsourced section titled "Westlife v. Spice Girls" which contains WP:OR. It also has WP:MOS issues such as multiple release dates in the infobox etc.

As one the (if not the) largest contributors to these articles please try to address such issues. You have done some good work and you should be recognised for it by getting the articles through WP:GA. Even if your not interested in that its obvious your a big fan of westlife but these articles are in a poor state at the moment. Lil-unique1 (talk) 02:13, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The information is all located on the talk page(s) of the relevent article(s). It cannot and will not be re-added into the article until it is sourced. I dont care if other articles have unsourced information, that doesn't make it right. The rules state that all information provided must be reliably sourced verifiable. Additionally WP:LEAK states that information about leaked songs should not be included unless it catches the attention of labels or the artists themselves. Finally the ASCAP is a songwriting agency and songs appearing on there could have been written and registered at any time it would be original research to claim that ASCAP leaked the song titles when in reality the information is there for the public to search for. Also youtube is a CANNOT be used to source leaked songs because that is a WP:copyright violation. Also if you had read the messages above properly you would have seen that I had clearly indicated where there are explainations of why the content was removed. Lil-unique1 (talk) 14:24, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New issues

Blogs and non-static Tabloid newspaper websites (The mirror's constantly changing website) are not WP:reliable sources for information. Furthermore what the heck is a sideshow? You cannot add information simply because you've seen it online somewhere and now you can't find it, you think its ok to add unsourced info. Sources must be verifiable and reliable. If you cannot adhere to the rules then we actually have a problem that I might not be able to help you solve. You can use Google News to search for sources and articles to prove what you are trying to claim. Rather than outright delete the info i added it to the talk pages to give you a chance to source it. Please do not disrespect wikipedia. If you require help trying to source things then that's a different matter. Ask me and i'll glady help or use the {{help me}} template. Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

proposed deletion notice

Are you still planning to revive Westlife timeline? I've tagged it for proposed deletion. Maybe, if you're still into it, it would be better developed in user space. East of Borschov 17:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

reference removed for notability concern

Myxxd, I removed your reference to the Westlife rendition of O Holy Night under "Notable renditions" because no reason was given for its notability. This has been a concern with that section of the article, and there has been much discussion on the talkpage about it. To keep the section from being removed altogether (as it has been, after it became more of a "list of recordings" rather than ones with some notability attached), I made this edit.Udpert (talk) 06:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Westlife. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rodhull andemu 15:45, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Your recent edit to the page Gravity Tour appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Itsbydesign (talk) 17:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nicole Schmitz

The article Nicole Schmitz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ng.j (talk) 16:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say good job adding some refs, but the more the better! All quotations especially need to be referenced. Thanks again for contributing, and I hope that you will continue to improve this article. Ng.j (talk) 07:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Myxxd. You have new messages at Ng.j's talk page.
Message added 07:28, 10 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ng.j (talk) 07:28, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Miss Philippines Earth 2012 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to San Juan, West Coast, San Fernando, Subic, Alaminos, Floridablanca, Kawit, Rodriguez, Daraga, Catarman, Lucena, Zamboanga and Tabuk

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Earth country rankings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Binibining Pilipinas 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicole Schmitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liloan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicole Schmitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimenez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nicole Schmitz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Domo Arigato

Melody Gersbach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to German

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:14, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Janine Tugonon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Buzz and ASAP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicole Schmitz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Buzz and TV5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Supranational country rankings, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Macedonia and Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss International country rankings, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Congo and Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss International special awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paulina Galvez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Anne Bianca Guidotti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Trade and Industry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Claire Danes

I have reverted your addition to the page of her Persona non grata status as you had not cited a credible source for this information or specified for which country this was for. Please make sure you cite any questionable information with a credible source and write it in the relevant section (e.g. Personal Life).

Thanks! --Bigdougscalari (talk) 13:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss International country rankings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss International country rankings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss International country rankings (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 09:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Miss International country rankings

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Miss International country rankings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Banner talk 09:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss International 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miss Philippines. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss International special awards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss International special awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss International special awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 00:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss USA state rankings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss USA state rankings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss USA state rankings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 00:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Myxxd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Myxxd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 in American television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashley Graham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shane Filan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wayne Rooney, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COVERSONG

Please review the applicable guideline, linked above. Most covers of songs are not listed in articles.

In general, covers should be listed if and only if the cover version satisfies WP:NSONG independent of the original version. In most instances, this is not the case. - SummerPhD^v2.0 14:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to What Hurts the Most, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". The majority of your edits are marked as minor edits though they are clearly not minor edits. SummerPhD^v2.0 14:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to List of songs recorded and performed by Westlife does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Again, please stop marking all of your edits as "minor". SummerPhD^v2.0 20:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of songs recorded and performed by Westlife, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Please Stay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit tag

You are using the minor edit check box when making changes to articles incorrectly. For correct use, see Wikipedia:Minor edit. Adding content is not a minor edit. Adding unsourced content is not a minor edit. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Your addition to Westlife has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 04:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Westlife, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blickling Hall & Westlife

Personally, I'm not a fan of "In popular culture" sections as they tend to become a repository for trivia. But if we must have Westlife, can we at least have Westlife sourced? Thanks. KJP1 (talk) 15:58, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. But can you put it in the article, rather than on my Talkpage. KJP1 (talk) 16:22, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Westlife. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 08:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Westlife discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to That's Life, Secret Garden, The Dance, No Matter What and The Reason

Shane Filan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Everything to Me

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Markus Feehily. Thank you. Nzd (talk) 11:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hey Whatever (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mandy

Home (Michael Bublé song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Greatest Hits Tour

World of Our Own (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Greatest Hits Tour

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UK Singles Chart records and statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Westlife discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Westlife discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Japanese, Forever, The Dance, My Girl, Easy, Miss You, Have You Ever, You Light Up My Life and Please Stay

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Greatest Hits (Westlife album) tracks

Template:Greatest Hits (Westlife album) tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Westlife discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jed Madela (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Davao

Morissette Amon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Davao

Shane Filan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to BMI

Westlife (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to No Matter What

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gravity tracks

Template:Gravity tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:09, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Where We Are tracks

Template:Where We Are tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Something Right, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Karaoke Collection (Westlife video album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Karaoke Collection (Westlife video album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Karaoke Collection (Westlife video album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:45, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Queen of Fake News

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Under section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kadane (talk) 07:40, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Westlife, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marvel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:...Allow Us to Be Frank tracks

Template:...Allow Us to Be Frank tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Con Lo Bien Que Te Ves

Hello Myxxd,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Con Lo Bien Que Te Ves for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

JamesG5 (talk) 09:36, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Against All Odds (Take a Look at Me Now) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Bop Bop Baby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Brandy (Scott English song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Evergreen (Westlife song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Flying Without Wings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Fool Again (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Hey Whatever (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Home (Michael Bublé song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

I Have a Dream (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

I Lay My Love on You (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

If I Let You Go (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

My Love (Westlife song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Obvious (Westlife song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Queen of My Heart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Something Right (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Swear It Again (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

The Rose (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Tonight/Miss You Nights (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Unbreakable (Westlife song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Uptown Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

What Makes a Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

When You're Looking Like That (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

When You Tell Me That You Love Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

World of Our Own (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nothing's Gonna Change My Love for You, you may be blocked from editing. I have asked you to review WP:COVERSONG and discuss the issue of you do not understand or disagree. You do not seem to have done so. Please stop adding cover versions that do not meet the criteria outlined. SummerPhD^v2.0 18:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shane Filan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Westlife, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MRT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Westlife discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazilian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Westlife discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Let Me Entertain You (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Westlife discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to All Saints, Spice Girl, West End, Caprice, Sonique, Feeder, Matt Smith, Parkinson, Steve Wilson, Billie, Mark Williams, Gabrielle, Hepburn, Northern Star, Brand New Day, Thunderball, Chris Jarvis, Bruce Jones, Ben Ward, Glitterbug and Stuart McDonald

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Myxxd. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Westlife discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting unsourced material

Please don't just delete whole chunks of unsourced material – a lot of it is perfectly sourceable if you take the time and effort to look for them. Either try and find sources, or mark the relevant sections with {{citation needed|date=December 2018}}. Thank you. Richard3120 (talk) 16:13, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Marchjuly. I noticed that you recently removed all content from List of Cliff Richard television appearances. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Happy New Year (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OCC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Love Album tracks

Template:The Love Album tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:00, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hello My Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All I Am (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hello My Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Good Morning Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hello My Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page What About Now (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everybody Hurts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page What About Now (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Your addition to Where We Are Tour (Westlife) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Queen of My Heart, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 14:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Westlife

Portal:Westlife, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Westlife and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Westlife during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:32, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Better Man (Westlife song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mike Horner and Steve Pearce

The Twenty Tour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to BTS and Bicocca

Spectrum (Westlife album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to BTS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Twenty Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Against All Odds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Twenty Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wild Youth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Twenty Tour

From the "Beijing Business Performances Permission" file. --Andrew318 (talk) 07:32, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

The Twenty Tour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Hyde Park and Shallow

List of Westlife concert tours (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hyde Park

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit users' talk page archives

In February of this year, you posted at User talk:Ss112/Archive 13. Please don't do this in future. If you have something to ask me, post on my talk page. Ss112 01:22, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Westlife discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 14:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia Magtanong to Bea Magtanong

Please revert to Patricia Magtanong. Her first name may be "Bea," but nobody calls her that. Please do not have "Bea Magtanong" as her wiki page, but it should be "Patricia Magtanong."

My apologies if I'm not reaching to you in the right avenues, I am not as Wiki-savvy as most here are, but I am certain you shouldn't have changed it from "Patricia Magtanong" to "Bea Magtanong."

I'd appreciate it if you reach out to me about this. Thanks so much. @Myxxd

Migsmigss (talk) 23:09, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at World of Our Own. SummerPhD^v2.0 18:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simon Ellis (record producer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Where We Are Tour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dynamite (Westlife song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Worldwide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hello My Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Westlife, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2000s (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spectrum (Westlife album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page You Light Up My Life (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dynamite (Westlife song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chances (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Westlife, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Newman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:07, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Westlife concert tours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding unsourced trivial information to Westlife articles

This has gone on way too long. Most of what you've added to Spectrum (Westlife album) recently has been unsourced, trivial detail that only interests fans like yourself. It needs to stop, so this is your final warning. I'll be keeping a closer eye on the article and reverting anything on there added by you that is unsourced from this point on, because there is enough on there at the moment not supported by a source. If you continue, I will issue you formal template warnings and failing that, report you to an admin. All information you add to Wikipedia must be sourced per WP:V. If it's not, don't add it at all. Ss112 01:23, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) Greetings user User:Ss112 Ss112. I too have noticed user Myxxd has a really bad problem editing anything to do with the band Westlife. I just spent about 4 hours editing articles to lead bandmember Shane Filan's wikipedia page, edits that were largely necessary only because of user Myxxd. Also, I had to add cleanup tags to the Westlife band wikipedia article, because it was so completely sensational and over detailed. User Myxxd has not listened to you. They are continuing to add extremely large amounts of trivial information to Westlife articles, and they are doing it in a biased way. I do not think they are capable of editing anything to do with the band. Their edits are ruining the readability of the articles. I ask you to look at the edits I made to the article about Westlife lead singer Shane Filan. I spent so much time on these. I also ask that you take a look at my cleanup tags I added to the Westlife band article, and also the talk section that I started for it. Decide for yourself if you think this user is capable of neutrally and productively editing Westlife pages. Their most recent edits to the Westlife band page were made on 2019 November 24, and they were completely trivial information/bad edits. I would appreciate your help very much in this matter. YouarelovedSOmuch (talk) 12:46, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Spectrum (Westlife album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 18:22, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Spectrum (Westlife album). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ss112 06:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. If this continues, you may be subject to sanctions including possibly a block or topic ban from Westlife. Seriously this persistent addition of unsourced and often trivial claims of fact needs to stop. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:48, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ad Orientem You're not the first person who has warned them a "final time". I have already discussed this problem just a few days ago with another editor like you. I think a topic ban is needed for user Myxxd. They are incapable of editing anything to do with the band "Westlife". See my comments here. YouarelovedSOmuch (talk) 21:09, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@YouarelovedSOmuch: Sorry, but with rare exceptions, admins cannot unilaterally impose topic bans. They need community approval. WP:ANI is that way.

@Ad Orientem: No apologies needed. I just think it needs to be done. Thanks for the response. This user's whole talk page is a complaint list about westlife article edits they have made, basically. How many final warnings can someone get before they become empty words? People have been saying these things to them for over ten years. They have not stopped and will not stop voluntarily. YouarelovedSOmuch (talk) 21:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@YouarelovedSOmuch: Not disagreeing. But admins do not have unrestricted authority. Except for narrowly defined cases covered by ACDS, we can't issue bans w/o community consensus. A block for persistent disruptive editing is, however, within our remit. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem: I am not disagreeing with you either. I never assumed admins had unrestricted authority. I am mostly just bringing awareness to those with more power than me. I am just a regular user. YouarelovedSOmuch (talk) 21:35, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@YouarelovedSOmuch: We are all regular editors. Admins just have a few extra tools given by the community to help keep things running smoothly, with the expectation that we will use them judiciously and where practicable, with restraint. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:32, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem: From your very first reply, I have not understood your tone. I have voiced what needs to be done, nothing more. The reason I am here, is because I spent several hours re-writing all of the article for Westlife lead singer Shane Filan, whose page was nearly unreadable due to edits by user Myxxd. When I finished rewriting the page, I realized that everything to do with Westlife, whether it be the band page, the band members' pages, or their albums, had been edited poorly in the same way, by the same user, for 10 years. In response to this, with me being just a regular user, that is, a user with out any extra tools, and with very limited knowledge, I brought it to the attention of more senior editors with more power and more knowledge, whom I had already discovered were giving final warnings to the user about similarly unsourced and trivial information. Then, when I saw you add another, new, final warning, I believed it was appropriate to point out that this had already happened to the user, ie, the warnings were not working, and the appropriate next step, whatever it may be, was needed. It was not meant as an insult to you, but as an expression and bringing-of-awareness of the fact of multiple warnings having been issued, which you may not have been aware of. So then, it was surprising to me when you said sorry to me, as though, in my frustration, I had petulantly demanded you ban them. I never assumed admins had unrestricted authority. But you responded as though I did. What I said was, user Myxxd needed to be topic-banned, for a laundry list of reasons, which I posted here for the world to see, and to multiple admins, with the hope it would bring awareness to those with "a few extra tools", or however else you would prefer to word it, and to those with more knowledge than I. From there, I had hoped an appropriate plan could start to be devised by these people, if there was one, since the warnings were going unheaded. User Drmies has already chimed in and offered valid advice, which is exactly what I am talking about. I also never said you were not a regular editor. What I said was, I was just a regular user. That is an important distinction. A regular user is someone like me, with no tools and little advanced knowledge, such as that Drmies has offered. When I, or anyone, voices their frustration about a situation to you, it is not necessarily directed at you. If there is an inherent design limitation with Wikipedia, so be it. I have done everything I know how to make it better, when it comes to this situation of user Myxxd, which is all I was ever trying to do. YouarelovedSOmuch (talk) 22:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ad Orientem, one thing to consider is a block for being completely incommunicado. They haven't ever responded to anything on this talk page, and some serious matters have been brought up here. Myxd, if you continue to insert unsourced information, and you continue to just ignore all these notes and comments and warnings--cause it looks like you're just ignoring them--and you continue to not discuss things on article talk pages, you may well find yourself blocked for uncollaborative behavior. Drmies (talk) 21:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: Good point. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:32, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem and Drmies: Myxxd has indeed continued adding unsourced material. As I said to AO, Myxxd is the type of editor who gets warned, lays low for a bit, and then continues on their merry way adding unsourced information once they think it's blown over and users have stopped paying attention to them. This is just in the last few days: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. It's obviously not going to stop; this has been going on for the past 10 years. Ss112 22:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The next time you add unsourced material, I will block you indefinitely. This has gone on long enough and your refusal to engage with your fellow editors over these issues is unacceptable. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem: The user has again added unsourced material here. While they did provide a source, it only shows a top 100, and the user changed the reference to say "200" when the UK chart has never shown any such extensive list. They have misconstrued what information is contained at sources before. Ss112 17:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stadiums in the Summer Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scarborough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]