User talk:Mysteriouslucifer

Welcome!

Hi Mysteriouslucifer! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! JarrahTree 01:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mera Baba Nanak (2023) (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shenaall was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The second paragraph of the lead seems like an advertisement. A wikipedia article need to be written in a neutral point of view. Also, this draft need more inline citation in the body / each section.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mera Baba Nanak (2023) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— ~~Shenaall~~ (t ♣ c) 02:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me to make the require amendment's and republish it? Mysteriouslucifer (talk) 15:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I'm not a native English speaker so I'm not confident on re-paraphrasing the paragraph. I can only help you with guidelines that you need across the Wikipedia which is noted in the blue box above. — ~~Shenaall~~ (t ♣ c) 03:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shenaall, Can you go through my other article, and suggest me the required changes so it doesn't get rejected. Mysteriouslucifer (talk) 09:47, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry the current draft backlog is already overload with around 2500 pending submissions, please wait until I or other reviewers found your other articles since there is no deadline to publish your article — ~~Shenaall~~ (t ♣ c) 00:49, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mysteriouslucifer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — ~~Shenaall~~ (t ♣ c) 02:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mera Baba Nanak (2023) (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CFA were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDB is not a reliable source, and Times of India generally shouldn't be used for establishing notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mera Baba Nanak (2023) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 16:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Punjabi cinema actors appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]