User talk:Myslfsbhijit

Nomination of Sanghasri Sinha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanghasri Sinha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanghasri Sinha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe (talk) 03:06, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't mind may know Why the article is selected for deletion ???? Myslfsbhijit (talk) 16:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Abishe thanks for review my crated article. I saw u had deleted the article . May I know the reason why you deleted the article. If you will tell me the reason and guide me then I can contribute better then before. And I also could be a better wikipedian . Waiting for your valuable answer. Thanks Myslfsbhijit (talk) 20:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pathikrit Basu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pathikrit Basu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. IMDB is not a reliable source (see WPLCITEIMDB) and you need good sources that focus on the person, not on the films. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 20:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Siri had created this page. And I had put real thing about his. But I think someone re-edit this page and put some fake information. So sir remove those information and please publish this page. Please sir I am begging you to publish this page. If you publish this page then I will be very obliged to you. Myslfsbhijit (talk) 15:00, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I had created this page. And I had put right information on this page. After that someone had re-edit some fake information. Sir please remove those fake information and please publish the page. I am begging to u. Sir if publish the then I will be highly obliged to you. Thanks Myslfsbhijit (talk) 15:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Revensfire ,thanks for your suggestion. I have put news article. Now please review the article. Waiting for your valuable answer. Thanks Myslfsbhijit (talk) 19:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Simran Upadhyay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simran Upadhyay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simran Upadhyay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello The9Man, thanks for reviewing my created article Simran Upadhyay. Sir I saw that u have consider my created article for deletion. May I know why you have selected the article for consider deletion. And please guide me for better edit and help me to be a better wikipedian. Waiting for your valuable answer. Thanks Myslfsbhijit (talk) 14:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Myslfsbhijit! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Need help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Myslfsbhijit! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Need help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pathikrit Basu (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This is not an article. Articles have prose

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pathikrit Basu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pathikrit Basu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 19:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Myslfsbhijit! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 19:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mangal Chandi (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Synoman Barris were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article depends on one source ,that is Times of India. More reliable, independent and secondary sources are needed for it to meet WP:NFILM and hence prove notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mangal Chandi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mangal Chandi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Megan☺️ ^{Talk to the monster} 08:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Myslfsbhijit! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Reliable sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saheb Chatterjee has been accepted

Saheb Chatterjee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Amkgp 💬 18:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gaurav Chakrabarty, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Shortcut, Fakebook and Bismillah. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sayak Chakraborty (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sayak Chakraborty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sayak Chakraborty, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī (^talk) 19:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 20:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SuperMarioMan , i had created an article named Sayak Chakraborty and after that you blocked me as a sockpuppet. But I don't know why you did this. So can you please tell me what is the reason of doing this. As I am not a sockpuppet. So please look into this matter and take action about it. Hopefully I will get reply soon.

Nomination of Phirki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phirki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phirki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 1292simon (talk) 08:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]