User talk:Muttnick

Non-existent categories

Hi Muttnick, I saw that you reverted my edit: [1] where I removed a non-existent category from the article. The category "Category:Perpetrators of crimes against humanity" has been deleted. If you want to know why it was deleted, you can ask the admin, Oshwah, who deleted it. According to MOS:CATORDER: "An article should never be left with a non-existent (redlinked) category on it". It's been removed again by another editor, please don't put it back, thanks... --IamNotU (talk) 12:42, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

J. Palmer Gaillard Jr. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Reconstruction

Jim Clyburn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Reconstruction

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

mma articles

Greetings. Since you have edited a number of pages of MMA related articles in Wikipedia, pls see the below.

Pls visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts and read through the MMA Wikipedia guidelines.
When a bout is announced which stating "finalizing, in work, rumors, verbally agreed, in the press, this means the bout is not official yet. Wait until it official bofore place it under the "Announced bouts" section of the event page.
When a bout is announced in the press, editors put the match up in the "Announced bouts" section (inline citation is needed)
When UFC.com / its local web site (pls check the reference beneath the fight card table in the Wikipedia page), the editors would remove the bout in the "Announced bouts" and place it in the "fight card" section.
When a fighter pulls from a fight (due to injury/or by UFC/ visa issues and etc), we placed the info in the "Background section" (inline citation needed) and remove the injured fighter name and put "TBD".
When a injured fighter has been replaced, editor put the info in the background section (with inline citation). If the new match up has not been shown in the UFC.com fight card, then we will removed the match up from the fight card and place it back to "Announced section". If the match up already shown in the UFC.com then jut put the replacement fighter in the fight card section.
When the event named has been announced (such as UFC Fight Night: dos Santos vs. Tuivasa) then we place the info in the background section (with inline citation). If UFC.com has shown the event name, then editor would move the article and article talk page name accordingly.
No colour box in the fighter's page infobox at event fight card page. No title eliminator in the fight card or body text in fighter page or event page. No (c) - champion on the event fight card unless the fighter is the current champion of the weight division.
"method" in the fight table is as per Sherdog.com as per WP:MMA guideline and please do not interpret the method yourself even if the method is incorrect as Wikipedia is all about WP:verification and not the true.
Fight card table set as vertical foramt instead of horizontal format to ease to input info and read (pls do not change them)
Pls read referencing for beginners to understand about referencing and how to provide inline citation.
I have sent you the welcome message, kindly register and read through links. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Muttnick (talk) 14:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome Muttnick. Let me know if anything else I could help. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

US Banknote Contest

November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operation Lost Trust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of William Johnson (judge)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Johnson (judge) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Extraordinary Writ -- Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:40, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of William Johnson (judge)

The article William Johnson (judge) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Johnson (judge) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Extraordinary Writ -- Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. If you're ever looking for a similar article to work on, you might check out John Rutledge, the only South Carolinian to serve as Chief Justice. He was, shall we say, an interesting character. The article is in decent shape and probably wouldn't require too much work to get to GA status. Be well! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Extraordinary Writ: Thank you! I am exhausted after the Johnson article but Rutledge isn't a bad idea at all! Take care of yourself! Muttnick (talk) 23:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the WikiCup!

Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup! The first round began on 1 January and your submissions page can be found here. If you are wondering how to get started, a good article or a GA review might be a good place to begin, or a DYK for a newly created article. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. The first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nukegate scandal

On 15 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nukegate scandal, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Nukegate scandal was precipitated by the largest business failure in the history of South Carolina? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nukegate scandal. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nukegate scandal), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William Johnson (judge)

On 21 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Johnson (judge), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that associate justice William Johnson was the first member of the U.S. Supreme Court who was not a member of the Federalist Party? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Johnson (judge). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, William Johnson (judge)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hugh Leatherman

On 8 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hugh Leatherman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hugh Leatherman effectively controls the state of South Carolina's budget? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hugh Leatherman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hugh Leatherman), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Edelson PC article

Hello. I noticed you are a member of Wikiproject: Law, and was hoping you could look at suggested request edits for the Edelson PC article. I’m an employee of Edelson PC and cannot make direct edits to the article because of a COI. This request has been pending since August 2, 2021. Here is the direct link. Talk:Edelson#Request Edits July 2021 Thank you for your consideration.NorthCenterChicago (talk) 17:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Decision of 1789

On 21 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Decision of 1789, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Decision of 1789 was the first significant construction on the meaning of the United States Constitution in the U.S. Congress? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Decision of 1789. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Decision of 1789), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Natural Gas Act of 1938, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preemption.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interview request re: J. Michelle Childs

Hi Muttnick -- I am Noam Cohen, a journalist who writes frequently about Wikipedia. I'd like to email with you about the editing of the Childs article since the news that she is being considered for the Supreme Court. Could you drop me a line at noamstuart <at> gmail.com? Thanks, --Chomsky1 (talk) 17:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of federal judges appointed by Joe Biden

you are correct. except she is on that list. it includes both appointed and nominated by Biden. cheers Floyd23 (talk) 03:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Muttnick

Thank you for creating United States v. Ruiz.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:58, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on draft

Hi! I see you are a member of WikiProject Law. I am seeking feedback on a draft I created about the well-known trial attorney Bill Carmody: User:Backyard116/sandbox/Bill Carmody. Thanks! Backyard116 (talk) 17:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]