User talk:Munmula

Munmula, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Munmula! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Munmula! You created a thread called Help - I need to validate my alternate account at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of From Dusk till Dawn characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jesse Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moving articles

Per WP:Requested moves, you shouldn't move an article when the move is likely to be contested. In the case of Legal status of drawn pornography depicting minors, it is something that should be discussed on the article's talk page first. I moved the article back. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:01, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Life imprisonment, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Life imprisonment. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - pivotman319 (📫) 09:28, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the article's talk page. - Munmula (talk), second account of Alumnum 09:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Life imprisonment

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!

Legality of child pornography

Hello, the svg map is replaced with png when you updated the map. Can you upload the source file instead if you still have it? Also note that the US does not have federal law against fictional child pornography, so like other pornography it falls under the Miller's test and state laws. At least California should be coloured in yellow. HXMtxBM7 (talk) 10:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your concerns. I'm not very good with handling SVG maps so I uploaded a different PNG map instead. I think that even if I edited that previous SVG map, it would not change the poor, blurry visual quality it had. If you think the map should be in SVG, I'm pretty sure it's possible to convert this new map I made to SVG, but I don't know how to do it.

Anyway, I've changed the US from orange to yellow (Commons may take some hours to process the change). If we have enough information about each state, we can change the map to cover state laws instead of the federal law by adding state borders to it. If you know where to find that information and think it should be done, please let me know. - Munmula (talk), second account of Alumnum 19:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dolly (company)

Hello, Munmula,

Thank you for creating Dolly (company).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

If you could add sources for the company's origins that would be great.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 14:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greta Thunberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page G1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Munmula! You created a thread called Help - blocked on another Wikipedia at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please note these special rules for climate change articles

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | talk 15:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]

I realize that you are actually an experienced editor, as User:Alumnum, but AFAICS, that account has not received an alert of this kind in the last year. So I'm putting one here. Bishonen | talk 15:57, 6 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]

January 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Olavo de Carvalho, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ixocactus (talk) 17:09, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revertive case

Hello Munmula. I noticed that an article you created, revertive case, had no sources cited. I tried to find some sources for it, but didn't have any luck. All the sources I was able to find about Manchu grammar only mention 5 cases and don't include revertive. The only other mention of "revertive case" that I've been able to find is a brief mention in the Manchu language article that was added by an account that hasn't edited Wikipedia since 2006 (and also doesn't cite any sources). Do you happen to remember where you got your information from for the article? Kaldari (talk) 19:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I created that and a couple of other stubs about grammatical cases a long time ago with the purpose of making some red links in this list blue and in the hope that someone would later expand them and add sources (unfortunately, they changed very little since then). I used the same text for all of them with only two variables: what they indicated and the languages in which they were found, both taken from that same (unsourced) list. As per my research, the original addition to the table of the revertive case, along with other Manchu cases, was made in 2006 by User:N-true, whose last edit was a little more than a month ago. I took the liberty of asking him about that on his talk page. - Munmula (talk), second account of Alumnum 20:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marcelo Dourado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manji (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:32, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Morumbi Shopping shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salvador (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Hi I’ve just reviewed Caralho. Thanks for your work on this article. It needs more inline citations rather than just a bibliography and a couple of refs. If you are able to add more inline citations that will be great. Also some of the content seems to be translated from pt.wiki. If this is so, the translation template must be placed on the article’s talk page. All the best

Mccapra (talk) 05:29, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American Politics Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Also: on any article as controversial and high profile as Veracity_of_statements_by_Donald_Trump you should follow WP:BRD, especially when making large changes to the lead. And neutrality is defined by the policy WP:NPOV not by what you perceive as neutral. Galobtter (pingó mió) 01:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lexicon (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On the Gaúcho dialect page

Hi, Could you help cleaning up the page? I added some new content but i don't feel like it is within the wikipedia standards so it would be great if you could help. Thank you in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by IJamm6I (talk • contribs) 04:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I've moved the section you added to the bottom of the article and made some small adjustments, but it is mostly fine. - Munmula (talk), second account of Alumnum 17:38, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Munmula. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by OhKayeSierra (talk) 18:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of alternate history fiction

added links pointing to James Wong, Matthew Robinson, Liberty City, Chris Williams and Don Hall

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the 20th century, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lake Placid, Squaw Valley and Marvel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

On the pornography law by region article you have created a diagram of legality of internet pornogrpahy I just want to request to know what sources you used for that information? Transcendent Presence (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Epiousion Papyrus 75.png

Why did you upload File:Epiousion Papyrus 75.png on WP's servers, where its size is reduced by a bot, instead of on WC's servers? I am sure it falls under c:Template:PD-scan or c:Template:PD-Art. Veverve (talk) 13:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Porn Map

I removed the map previously because it was unsourced and based on google searches the information may hav incorrect. how did you source it? so I can flesh out the table more? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Transcendent Presence (talk • contribs) 06:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I simply made the map based on what the table informs. - Munmula (talk), second account of Alumnum 07:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And thereupon is the issue most of the table is false Transcendent Presence (talk) 21:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I've removed the info from the table too. - Munmula (talk), second account of Alumnum 21:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi user:Munmula will you please leave your email here or text me at patricpacarson54@gmail.com --2401:4900:311A:E205:295D:70A6:E7B9:4EC3 (talk) 11:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You can email me at anvos.gorbs@gmail.com - Munmula (talk), second account of Alumnum 11:58, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Cryptopunks general.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Cryptopunks general.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 16:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello

Hello, do you have anywhere I can reach you privately please? perhaps an email of some kind? Thanks a lot! Laurencollier (talk) 21:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You can email me at anvos.gorbs@gmail.com. - Munmula (talk), second account of Alumnum 22:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient Rome

Hi, I have a question for you. Are you going to fix the "Ancient Rome" article? I've tried, but I'm having a hard time resolving the lack of sources warnings. Would you be able, over time, to fix the article ? I ask you because I saw from the history of the article that you contributed a lot to the article. Regards. LukeWiller (talk) 15:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hello. I was going to work on that right now, but it seems you already fixed it. Do you still need help? - Munmula (talk), second account of Alumnum 19:30, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of fiction featuring human-dinosaur coexistence moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of fiction featuring human-dinosaur coexistence, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of fictional computers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The claim that Esperanto is male by default

Hello, you undid my sourced contribution to Comparison between Esperanto and Ido by claiming it is unsourced(?). If you read Plena Manlibro de Esperanta Gramatiko 2022 (PMEG), the most well-respected and (and de facto the) grammar guide of Esperanto, which I sourced, you will see that Esperanto being gendered is no longer the case. Right here, as a matter of fact. Specifically, it mentions that only certain words like 'brother', 'king', 'gentleman' and such are gendered as male, with their feminine counterparts being inherently female. You will notice that barring these exceptions, words can be made specifically male with the vir- prefix. If you are not convinced, I would like to see sources to the contrary, but note that you will need to edit Esperanto vocabulary#Gender and Gender reform in Esperanto#Gender in Esperanto, which contain claims that are in line with PMEG's stance to avoid inconsistent claims across different Wikipedia articles. Thank you. 195.155.171.170 (talk) 05:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I edited in a hurry and didn't notice that you actually sourced it. Well, that sounds convincing to me, but we would need to see the opinion of other users. I will take the liberty of opening a discussion on the article's talk page. - Munmula (talk · contribs) 06:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! 195.155.171.170 (talk) 08:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of fiction featuring human-dinosaur coexistence

Hello, Munmula. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of fiction featuring human-dinosaur coexistence, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orientative case

Hi! A while back, Alumnum created the article orientative case, which as of writing is a stub with no sources cited. Do you by any chance remember where you got the information? RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 11:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A long time ago I created a couple of articles about obscure grammatical cases supposedly existing in Manchu and other languages, which were originally added by another user, in the hopes that this user or someone else would soon add sources, but, unfortunately, no one did so far. I have been asked about a similar article before. Please refer to a few sections above, in "Revertive case". - Munmula (talk · contribs) 12:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Adolf Rutenberg is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:15, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! - Munmula (talk · contribs) 21:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dinho-mamonas.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dinho-mamonas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Guilty Conscience (song), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 20:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Mask (short story)

Hello, Munmula

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SailingInABathTub, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, The Mask (short story), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SailingInABathTub}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 22:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, The Mask (short story)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, The Mask (short story). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – The Mask. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Mask. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:02, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Alice and Sparkle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Happily ever after.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Dolly logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Dolly logo.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]