User talk:Muirchertach1

March 2018

Hello, Muirchertach1, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Be careful not to repeat the same behaviors, such as edit-warring and POV pushing, that got you blocked last time. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the September 11 attacks. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Acroterion (talk) 23:31, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Muirchertach1 reported by User:Jebcubed (Result: ). Thank you. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 12:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Muirchertech1: Now that you've reverted four times against three editors, I've filed my own report at AN3. Acroterion (talk) 16:37, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at 9/11 conspiracy theories

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:45, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Stop the Steal. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv🍁 15:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Stop the Steal. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:17, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Stop the Steal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 15:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As usual, you reverted my edit. But I'm sure your handful of comrades will eventually bully your version in.Muirchertach1 (talk) 15:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend discussing this on the talk page before editing it further. – bradv🍁 15:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your most recent revert is (at least) your fourth. If you do not self-revert, it is likely that sanctions will be imposed. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, so my edits that did not revert others are reverts, and your multiple reverts (which undid my edits) are fair and constructive edits. Yeah, that's par for the course.Muirchertach1 (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I just deleted the whole paragraph, as it's rife with original research anyway. Please discuss on the talk page before adding it back in. – bradv🍁 15:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How is simply citing the results of a poll 'original research'? Are we just supposed to say 'a poll was conducted,' with no mention of the results? Ridiculous.Muirchertach1 (talk) 15:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Stop the Steal. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Primefac (talk) 15:50, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Praxidicae (talk) 15:50, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement

See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. FDW777 (talk) 16:41, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 17:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]