User talk:MuhammadYusufAttari

Welcome and al-Salam `alaykum!

Salam `alaykum, MuhammadYusufAttari, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kingturtle (talk) 00:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please send our salams to Sayyedi `Ameer-e-Ahlesunnat (damat barakatahum al-`aalia)

Re: Tahir ul Qadri

Please do not accuse members of vandalism. I do not mind if you change the word unique to prominent or remove stories of dreams etc. but you have vandalised the page and made a statement biased by saying that Dr. Qadri "only" sent out a referendum so I reverted the whole edit. You have also reciently vandalised the page by removing the names of the Yemeni scholars who recieved Dr. Qadri's Ijaza including the pictures and this is a clear form of vandalism so before accusing other members of vandalism do not vandalise the page yourself. What I did was clearly not vandalism as I only reverted your edit and any changes you made and brought the page back to its previous form. So would you first kindly read the rules of wikipedia and find out the definition of vandalism before accusing experienced users. You are still new to wikipedia I'm afraid and you need to learn how it works and the different rules of wikipedia before making any further edits. Hasseniqbal192 (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on my talk page.

Firstly, When you add a comment on somebody's talk page it is strongly recommended to sign your comment so one may tell who made the comment. Secondly, I made no personal attacks but said that you should rather learn more about wikipedia's rules and policies before making any further edits and you are fairly new here. If this is seen as an insult or personal attack then it suggests that the person lacks a good deal of commons sense which is also well recommended to have to make constructive edits.

Thirdly what you put on my talk page was clearly a personal insult and an attack and you have accused me a second time of doing something which I have not done and this is not acceptable.

Fourthly, you suggest that I need advising by these so called proper sunni islamic scholars which I do not need at the moment as I am more than happy with the advice I get and seeing your vandalism and weird assumptions of me being big-headed I think that it could be suggested to change your advisors to someone more suitable.

Thank you very much

Hasseniqbal192 (talk) 17:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

==Salam==

I am very disappointed to see the Present article when i edit it it was fairly good but i was engaged in Milad debate with Mezmezo who is distorting Sunni Articles.I request You to Please write a full fedge article for it and first discuss it on talk page and then Insert it so it may be permanent.You may also collect different sunni /Sufi Users or some Neutral User for it.Shabiha ^{(t • c)} 14:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

plzz brother tell me.....

wts going on.......in the topic Dawat-e islami.......??? im new on wikipedia........n dont know......how to edit wt to do.......? i added some new info without reference.......it ws removed.........now i added info WITH REFERENCE LINK......again it is removed.....:( --Madinah madinah (talk) 18:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kanz ul Huda

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kanz ul Huda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:05, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kanz ul Huda

The article Kanz ul Huda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of satisifying WP:GNG or WP:ORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]