User talk:Mstott4

February 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, British Home Stores, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 12:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BHS

I must admit I was astounded at your justification for the removal of images on the BHS page. BHS may prefer we do not show older shop fronts but we are not image consultants nor are we in business to write an article amenable to them. If this is true and BHS are meddling than it looks like the last desperate act of an obsolete brand. I shall replace the images in full; make a similar edit to this or other pages and I shall report you for vandalism. Mtaylor848 (talk) 12:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 16:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

While it appears that you have made a disclosure of paid editing in the edit summary of Draft:Challenge Advisory LLP, this page looks like it is on its way to being deleted. your disclosure will be deleted along with it.

If you intend to write about this topic again, or any other topic where you have a financial interest, please use the {{paid}} template on your user page (User:Mstott4) as a permanent place for this mandatory disclosure. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Challenge Advisory LLP (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Challenge Advisory LLP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mstott4, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Challenge Advisory LLP

Hello, Mstott4. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Challenge Advisory LLP".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 11:51, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]