User talk:Cukie Gherkin

New page reviewer granted

{{safesubst:require subst|template=New Page Reviewer granted|1=

Hi Cukie Gherkin. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Steps such as checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline are mandatory and will take a few minutes per article.
Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any required steps.
Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. ~~

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 12 § Pokémon species introduced in Pokémon X and Y

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 12 § Pokémon species introduced in Pokémon X and Y on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Web-julio (talk) 04:19, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Puff-puff (onomatopoeia)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Puff-puff (onomatopoeia) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Puff-puff (onomatopoeia)

The article Puff-puff (onomatopoeia) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Puff-puff (onomatopoeia) for comments about the article, and Talk:Puff-puff (onomatopoeia)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 03:41, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:FoxMcCloud.png

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:FoxMcCloud.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 22:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Iruka13: This doesn't seem to be the case? The image page does link to an article containing the image. (talk page stalker)--Alexandra^IDV 23:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC #4 & 10. — Ирука¹³ 23:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pyra and Mythra

Hi Cukie Gherkin!

In Talk:Xenoblade Chronicles, someone brought up the possibility of creating an article on Pyra and Mythra. I previously created an article a couple years ago, but it was merged back into the Xenoblade Chronicles 2 page as it did not have enough notability in relation to the real world. Now I would like to revive the project.

It was brought to my attention by Sergecross73 that you have gathered some sources. Would you be willing to share your findings? --MomoQca (talk) 20:27, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]