User talk:Mr cosmic king

This is Mr cosmic king's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hi Mr cosmic king! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! PainProf (talk) 05:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on Ayurveda

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Survey

Hi! I am doing a quick survey of new Wikipedia users.

How did you hear about Wikipedia?

What convinced you to start editing?

Thanks!

--Guy Macon (talk) 11:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Govardhan Ayurveda App (December 23)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by RPSkokie were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

RPSkokie (talk) 14:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mr cosmic king! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RPSkokie (talk) 14:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mr cosmic king! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, The Simplest steps to make a article., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gokul Rajendran moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gokul Rajendran, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Govardhan Dravyam App

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mr cosmic king (talk) 09:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the necessary changes. I hope it's what you asked for. Please let me know if i need to add anything more. I'm new to wiki and I'm happy to learn.

Speedy deletion nomination of Gokul Rajendran

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gokul Rajendran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DMySon (talk) 09:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Your recent item has been moved to draftspace at Draft:Govardhan Dravyam App. It does not have sufficient referencing / sourcing to be published in mainspace and the move there was out of process following rejection and without submitting for review. Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources, which must be independent of the subject. Sourcing to Google Play only indicates that the App. exists and cannot demonstrate notability. Instagram is not reliable per WP:UGC. Please develop in draftspace; if it is moved again 'out of process' it is likely that it wuld be proposed for deletion. If / when it is considered ready for publication it should be submitted for review. Eagleash (talk) 09:46, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 09:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Govardhan Dravyam App for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Govardhan Dravyam App is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Govardhan Dravyam App until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eagleash (talk) 12:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mr cosmic king. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Govardhan Ayurveda App, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note there is the same issue with Draft:Gokul Rajendran. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gokul Rajendran (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gokul Rajendran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gokul Rajendran, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Mr cosmic king, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mr cosmic king|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 16:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong: No No! I'm Not a Paid User. I'm a Ayurveda Student. I have interest in Ayurveda stuff. So, I'm here to be good editor. And I use that particular app. And has connection with Apps Founder. Nothing More. I love promoting Ayurveda related topics. That's all. Not getting paid for that. User:mr cosmic king([[User talk:mr cosmic king|talk) Mr cosmic king (talk) 16:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that you are a paid editor. Off-wiki evidence conclusively ties you closely enough that you fit the paid editor definition at WP:PE. "Paid editor" includes being an owner, employee, contractor, investor or other stakeholder. Follow the instructions at WP:PE. You are required to disclose your financial relationship. Do not make any edits to Govardhan Dravyam App until after you make the required disclosures, then follow the WP:PE instructions on how to request an edit.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rsjaffe: Bro! I'm not a paid editor. I just know this app because i use the services to learn. It's a great app helping others study medicine. I too use it. So i thought it will be good to add about the app in wikipedia. Nothing else. If you say i cant edit it. I;m okay with it. May be someone else will do it. Mr cosmic king (talk) 17:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestion is that you make contributions to wikipedia about things you know, such as Ayurvedic medicine. I suggest reading Help:Introduction before you start. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gokul Rajendran has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gokul Rajendran. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 23:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr cosmic king (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I'm new Wikipedia. And i was here to make a article which i knew about. I can't write about articles without knowledge about them. How can it be a reasong to be blocked. This is not right. Because of these Guys. I hate wiki now. Now I know wiki is not open sourced. its not. Yamla (talk) 18:03, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This seems to be an incoherent rant and not an unblock request. Yamla (talk) 18:03, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gokul Rajendran

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Gokul Rajendran, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:40, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Govardhan Dravyam App

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Govardhan Dravyam App, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]