User talk:Motoe123

Welcome!

Hello, Motoe123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Century break has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Betty Logan (talk) 23:12, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Your recent editing history at Century break shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Betty Logan (talk) 23:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A case has been filed against you regarding your actions at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring should you wish to present a defence. Betty Logan (talk) 00:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As Betty has been trying to convey to you, the source you keep trying to add to the article has been deemed unreliable, and unusable, on Wikipedia. You need to either stop re-adding it, find a new source to support the information, or find a new consensus that supports its use, through further discussion on it. If you re-add the old source again without a consensus from further discussion, then you will be blocked from editing. Sergecross73 msg me 16:46, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Century break

You've been warned per the outcome of a edit-warring complaint (permalink). You are risking a block the next time you modify a snooker-related article whose talk page you have never used. Adding badly-sourced material to Wikipedia articles is not acceptable. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately you have proceeded to disrupt rather than discuss, so you have left me with no choice but to file yet another case at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Motoe123_reported_by_User:Betty_Logan_.28Result:_.29. Betty Logan (talk) 19:18, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Continued edit warring at Century break

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard (permalink). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]