User talk:Motbag12

Welcome!

Hello, Motbag12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 23:31, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable Sources

Hi Motbag12. I reverted your edit at Indian century but please feel free to add it back along with reliable sources. Statements of fact like the ones you've added should always be backed up with an RS. See WP:RS for what constitutes a reliable source. --regentspark (comment) 17:00, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, though I'm not going to revert you again, do note that labeling legitimate edits as vandalism is not considered a good sign of your staying power on Wikipedia. --regentspark (comment) 17:13, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indian Century. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:23, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm EricEnfermero. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Indian Century that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EricEnfermero (Talk) 05:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of ANI noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:ANI regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:ANI#User:Motbag12 edit warring, called editors white trash and vandals. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 06:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Your recent editing history at Indian Century shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 06:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Motbag12 reported by User:Twitbookspacetube (Result: ). Thank you. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 07:39, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the change you wish to make on the talk page if you wish to retain your ability to edit articles. Right or wrong, your continued edit warring is heavily disruptive. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 07:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Offensive comments

I note your summary for this edit.

Comment on the edit, not what you imagine are the motives, ethnicity, social class, etc of the editor. I have given you some time to cool off. During this period, ask yourself whether you're here to create a neutral encyclopedia (if necessary via cool, rational argument on the relevant talk page), or whether instead you are keen to advance a particular point of view. If it's the latter, please do not return.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for harassing other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

-- Hoary (talk) 09:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editing logged out and previous block evasion

You are lucky that Hoary didn't extend your earlier block for editing with an IP while blocked. Please stop editing both as an IP and with your account. And if you continue to accuse editors of vandalism, you will be blocked again and for a longer time. Please read WP:VANDALISM. Doug Weller talk 16:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pranab Mukherjee and Good Article status

Motbag12, you added a GAR template to the talk page of this article, which leads me to believe that you don't understand how the Good Article process works. For articles that are not currently Good Articles, they should be nominated through the Good Article Nomination process, which is explained at WP:GANI (instructions on nominating articles for GA). If you wish to nomination the article to be a GA, please be sure you read these instructions fully.

The Good Article Reassessment process is intended for articles that are currently Good Articles but perhaps no longer meet the Good Article criteria, hence a reassessment to see whether they do. In very rare cases, if an article has just been failed as part of a GA nomination review that seems to have been poorly conducted, a reassessment might be used, but it's typically better just to renominate the article through the regular GA nomination process.

I reverted your GAR template on the article's talk page; it's definitely not the correct approach. When you read the GA nomination instructions page, you'll note that Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination. With only a single edit to the article, you are not a significant contributor, so please make that consultation and allow at least the standard seven days for a response before proceeding with the GA nomination if the editors concur, making sure to first address any issues they note that would prevent the article from passing at GA.

There is a significant backlog of GA nominations—373 are currently awaiting reviews. A review might not start for weeks or even months, or it could be picked up in a matter of hours, depending on what article a potential reviewer is interested in taking on. As nominator, you are expected to respond to the reviewer's requests for improvements to the article if it falls short of meeting any of the criteria; it is a rare article that doesn't require work of some sort. Thank you for your interest in the GA process, and best of luck going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed your two Civil Service GA nominations from this morning, and neither GA nominee templates is filled in correctly. You should be substituting the GAN template, as explained in the GA instructions, not trying to copy and modify a pre-existing GA nominee template. I'll fix them this time, but please familiarize yourself with the GA nomination instructions before doing any more nominating. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up: I have just removed both of your GA nominations because you are effectively requesting a downgrade of the articles. They are currently A-class articles, which has more stringent requirements than a GA and means the articles are even better than Good Articles. (From lowest to highest, articles are rated Stub, Start, C-class, B-class, GA, A-class, FA. Each level has its own criteria that must be met.) I think, before you do anything more in terms of article status, you need to familiarize yourself with how these processes work and what the criteria are. Please take that time. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

I'm not sure why you uploaded this photo as a non-free file. Because it was published in 1867, it is in the public domain and should have been upload to Wikimedia Commons. The file can be found here. Can I suggest you ask to have it speedy deleted, then upload a new version. Thanks.

Replaceable fair use File:Massachusetts Agricultural College 1867 students.png

Thanks for uploading File:Massachusetts Agricultural College 1867 students.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Tata Hall HBS.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tata Hall HBS.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Massachusetts Agricultural College 1867 students.png

Thanks for uploading File:Massachusetts Agricultural College 1867 students.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did it for you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of University of Massachusetts Amherst.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of University of Massachusetts Amherst.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of University of Massachusetts Amherst.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of University of Massachusetts Amherst.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vietnam War Protest UMass Amherst.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vietnam War Protest UMass Amherst.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Motbag12, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Indian Foreign Service have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 13:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing and logging in

Motbad, you have made an almost ridiculous amount of edits while not logged in. I don't know if you're the most forgetful person in the world or what, but you must realize that the not-so-friendly interpretation of your editing behavior (in a combination of logged in and logged out edits in the same article) is that you are not logging in to make it appear as if more than one editor is supporting the cause. That's not OK. I think, for now, that you are not doing this on purpose, but by the same token, I have to ask you to stop this: overlap between IP edits and edits from registered accounts are really always suspicious. Log in, as a matter of course.

Usually admins go through and delete IP addresses in order to protect privacy, but in your case these IPs are so blatantly you (meaning, you seem to care so little about your online privacy) that I see no need to look at these hundreds of edits and clean them up. Again, I urge you to make better choices, for your own sake. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More copyvio

I've just removed some from Ratan Tata and Harvard Business School. Note that if this continues you may be blocked. Doug Weller talk 17:13, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content, as you did at Imperial Secretariat Service. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. regentspark (comment) 13:31, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Arun Kumar OIDB.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Arun Kumar OIDB.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 01:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for obvious block evasion through IP editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 11:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sivathanu Pillai.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sivathanu Pillai.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued block evasion with utterly unacceptable edit summary attacks, see https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/182.69.176.68. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 16:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arun Kumar OIDB.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arun Kumar OIDB.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dinesh Singh Rajya Sabha.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dinesh Singh Rajya Sabha.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gautam Sanyal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gautam Sanyal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Isenberg School 2019 Bjarke Ingels Group Goody Clancy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Isenberg School 2019 Bjarke Ingels Group Goody Clancy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CSS Special Training Assistant Superintendents 1951.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSS Special Training Assistant Superintendents 1951.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Verghese Kurien with Prime Minister Indira Gandhi.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Verghese Kurien with Prime Minister Indira Gandhi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Verghese Kurien with Prince Charles.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Verghese Kurien with Prince Charles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CSS Special Training Assistant Superintendents 1951.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSS Special Training Assistant Superintendents 1951.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Official Logo of the Indian Police Service.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official Logo of the Indian Police Service.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Isenberg School 2019 Bjarke Ingels Group Goody Clancy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Isenberg School 2019 Bjarke Ingels Group Goody Clancy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]