User talk:Morgankarki

September 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Go Goa Gone have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Go Goa Gone was changed by Morgankarki (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890256 on 2021-09-14T10:33:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No edit is constructive Morgankarki (talk) 10:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Morgankarki, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Morgankarki! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	For making several minor edits to Shubhra Gupta. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 18:02, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Morgankarki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Morgankarki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete the article Hindustani Bhau Morgankarki (talk) 02:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Morgankarki. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Hindustani Bhau, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Collin DCunha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Collin DCunha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Collin D' Cunha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Collin D' Cunha. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Collin D'Cunha. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Collin D'Cunha. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aranyak

Hi Morgankarki, I'm messaging you in relation to your edits on the Aranyak (TV series) page. I also notice that you are the one who created the page titled Aranyak (series). Kudos to you for doing that. Now, I realize that you are a new editor, I see that you've only been on Wikipedia for a few months. This, of course, means that your experience level is low and, naturally, you will make many mistakes (we all still make mistakes, even after many years). The reason I decided to write this to you is that I would like to encourage you to be a bit more diligent in your editing work. The page you created, Aranyak (series), was in horrible shape. Not only was the formatting and wikimarkup incorrect, but it didn't look like you proofread your own work, as the level of English in the article was not great. Now that I've redirected the page to the one you most recently edited, Aranyak (series), I'm noticing more sloppy work on your part. For example, you deleted redlinks, without apparently checking if they perhaps served a purpose. You've added wikilinks where none are necessary (common terms like "crime thriller" do not require links). Going forward, I would suggest that you peruse the Wikipedia Manual of Style in order to familiarize yourself with dos and don'ts and suggested styles. This will be helpful to you as it will improve your editing skills, and it will also benefit other editors, who will have less cleaning up to do after you. Not to mention, of course, that you will enhance the experience of WP readers by making better edits. Anyway, this isn't meant as a rebuke, more as an encouragement to push yourself to improve your editing style. Feel free to reach out should you have any questions or need help with anything :) Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 04:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing on Aranyak article

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aranyak (TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 04:31, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hi, I'm Jthistle38. I've once again reverted your revert of my initial revert on List of nuclear close calls. Let's discuss this on the article's talk page. — JThistle38 (talk) 23:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stutee Ghosh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Stutee Ghosh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 05:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citation has been updated please change to article space!!! Morgankarki (talk) 06:19, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 15:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3 Thanks for the template but we do not need the ARBIPA way out for blatant vandalism on BLPs and this is not a newbie. Bishonen, fyi. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why ARBIPA ? Morgankarki (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to browse through your own contributions. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 00:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for a week for blatant vandalism of a biography of a living person with childish edit summary and nonsensical threats. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 17:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Nomination of Collin D'Cunha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Collin D'Cunha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collin D'Cunha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 12:30, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is the reason behind deletion? Could you please explain in few points? Cause I don't think there is violation in Wikipedia guidelines Morgankarki (talk) 12:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I am wrong then tell me why it took so long for nominating the deletion process of the Article Shubhra Gupta and Collin D'Cunha? Because if the article had violated the guidelines why it should keep in mainspace with wikidata item? I don't think both articles has some unauthentic content and violation edits!!! Please consult and remove the tag of deletion as soon as possible after discussion only otherwise I have to take a deliberate action further!!! Morgankarki (talk) 13:19, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shubhra Gupta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shubhra Gupta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shubhra Gupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 12:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey please specify the reason for nominating the deletion process of this article? Morgankarki (talk) 12:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I am wrong then tell me why it took so long for nominating the deletion process of the Article Shubhra Gupta and Collin D'Cunha? Because if the article had violated the guidelines why it should keep in mainspace with wikidata item? I don't think both articles has some unauthentic content and violation edits!!! Please consult and remove the tag of deletion as soon as possible after discussion only otherwise I have to take a deliberate action further!!! Morgankarki (talk) 13:19, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I even got Minor Barnstar for editing shubhra Gupta!!! Morgankarki (talk) 13:25, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello Morgankarki. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Mai (TV series), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Morgankarki. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Morgankarki|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DMySon (talk) 12:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mai (TV series), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please Do not remove COI tag. DMySon (talk) 12:59, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bishonen, I am pinging you here as You've already dealt with this user. Please check his contribution, he has tried to remove COI tag and adding copyrighted content on Mai (TV series) even after my warnings. DMySon (talk) 13:07, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Shubhra Gupta. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 06:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Morgankarki

Thank you for creating Jaadugar (2022 film).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate talk page editing

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Indian Predator: The Butcher of Delhi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. I notice that you have, on several occasions, attempted to remove comments by other editors and also a notice of a decision about an article for deletion discussion by undoing or reverting comments and blanking the talk page. This editing behaviour on a talk page is not acceptable editor behaviour. Please read the Talk page guidelines and follow them. Also, I notice you have undone the redirect that was the outcome of the article for deletion decision. You need to explain why you did that. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 12:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I know you all have some misunderstanding under the title of the series. The series title Indian Predator The Butcher of Delhi is the official title from Netflix media center and their official website. The tag "The Butcher of Delhi" is not a part of the single episode but the whole 3 episodes revolves around the same story of one person Chandrkant Jha Serial Killer. The Butcher of Delhi is the title and the tag line of his story and the premise of the series. It's not like a anthology documentary which in every episode has different story. This series has nothing to do with that. Hope you understood. You can check the title of another netflix docu series named "House of Secrets: The Burari Deaths" which has 4 episodes where all episodes deals with the same story.the article has nothing to do with redirect process and deletion process. This article has the title problem but above I mentioned the reason about it. You can consult me for further details and misunderstanding on this topic. Good day:) Morgankarki (talk) 14:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no concerns about the TITLE of the article, nor its contents. What I am concerned about is your talk page editing behaviour. Removing other editors' comments, blanking the page, or undoing other talk page edits, looks like vandalism because this looks like you are trying to take OWNERSHIP of the article. Please remember that whatever you write needs to survive the CONSENSUS editing decisions of future editors. When you hit the publish button, you release all control over what you have written. There are 122,190 active editors out there in Wikipedialand, (not even counting anonymous editors), who you need to satisfy with what you write, or they will change it. You cannot protect an article against the consensus, don't even try, it is ultimately futile. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 12:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Predator: The Butcher of Delhi

Please note that Indian Predator: The Butcher of Delhi was deleted / changed to a redirect following a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Indian_Predator:_The_Butcher_of_Delhi. Please respect that discussion. The best option would be to create a draft at Draft:Indian Predator: The Butcher of Delhi and wait for it to be reviewed. Alternatively, asking for a deletion review, pointing to the history version with your changes. Ignoring an AFD discussion just a few weeks old is disruptive and not helpful. Ravensfire (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Could you all especially the ones who are urge to keep this article to redirect and deletion process without any valid reason...!!!please tell me and educate me why the hell you all put the article Indian Predator: The Butcher of Delhi to redirect and also for deletion? Point me the valid reason why the hell you put that article to redirect and deletion? Firstly, the article has no issues on the field of content, citations, title, and even it has fulfilled basic Wikipedia guidelines. Tell me what is the reason behind all this! Morgankarki (talk) 16:13, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Ravensfire that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 16:13, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to leave insulting messages for other editors, you will be blocked. If you can't edit in a civil manner, you will be prevented from editing completely. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:49, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Morgankarki. Thank you for creating Stutee Ghosh. User:HouseBlaster, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I believe that this topic meets ANYBIO#1.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|HouseBlaster}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

House Blaster^talk 17:14, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to CAT (Indian Web series), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Please do not move the article as there is difference between TV Series and Web series. Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:40, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Morgankarki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is __192.168.10.10.104_____Morgankarki (talk) 02:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is your home network IP address and not the one you use to connect to the internet. If it does not appear in the message you get when you attempt to edit, you can use a tool like whatismyip dot com or Google to determine it. 331dot (talk) 08:04, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edit conflict

Please stop reverting my edit on Scoop (2023 TV series) as your review writing is not per the standard. Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

State with proof How it is not as per Standard Morgankarki (talk) 08:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Your recent editing history at Rastriya Swatantra Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 18:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What source do you need? how political party can be with three political ideologies at once? are you mad or what? THEY ARE CENTRIST!!! you are placing wrong information on that page!! you need to be banned and blocked from Wikipedia not me!

if you continue with such nonsensical reply, go and edit other Wikipedia articles that filled tons of biasness Morgankarki (talk) 18:15, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abitration enforcement

Please see the arbitration enforcement restrictions on Donald Trump: You must follow the bold-revert-discuss cycle if your change is reverted. You may not reinstate your edit until you post a talk page message discussing your edit and have waited 24 hours from the time of this talk page message. Please undo your edit and start a talk page discussion, otherwise I'll have to report this. — Czello ^(music) 09:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Czello ^(music) 12:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics alert

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 14:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump

Hello, Morgankarki,

This is a widely watched article included in the contentious subject area of post-1992 politics of the United States and has been for years. The content has been heavily debated if you look at the extensive talk page archives. Please do not remove large amounts of content without proposing it on the talk page first or you will most likely be immediately reverted.

You should also go to WP:ANI and participate in the discussion about your editing. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:12, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]