User talk:Monsieur Loya

This is Monsieur Loya's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Circus Bazaar Magazine (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Circus Bazaar Magazine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Circus Bazaar Magazine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Monsieur Loya! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Monsieur Loya (talk) 06:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Updates made

Your submission at Articles for creation: Circus Bazaar Magazine (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Circus Bazaar Magazine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Circus Bazaar Magazine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:17, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Circus Bazaar Magazine

Hello, Monsieur Loya. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Circus Bazaar Magazine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zac Rogers (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Your submission at Articles for creation: Circus Bazaar Magazine (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Much of this is supported by the publication itself or sponsored by the publication which are an independent sources and Counter Punch and IMDB are not reliable sources so should not be used.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Circus Bazaar Magazine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:48, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Circus Bazaar Magazine

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

talk 11:18, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Circus Bazaar Magazine

The article Circus Bazaar Magazine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 180.150.37.213 (talk) 02:17, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has been publicly acknowledged by the owners official social media channels that this page has come under ransom attack by bad faith actors on Wikipedia. I have had a look at the case and believe that this to be the case. I have therefor removed the deletion request and added three additional references from the media in the country of Norway. This publication was added under a serial publication project and flagged to be approved by Norwegian Editors. Many of the citations are from the Scandinavian media landscape and are therefore not available in English. Prior to judgement and deletion this page needs to be properly viewed by "non" bad faith Norwegian based editors. Monsieur Loya (talk) 14:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Monsieur Loya,

Can you be more specific about your claims of "extortion"? Has someone contacted you or this company asking for money? This goes against Wikipedia policy and should be investigated if these accusations are true. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The accusations are true to the extent that the official social media channels of the magazine in question are posting screenshots of the "extortion" attemopts by bad faith actors. Thes screenshots are also being posted in Norwegian business forums. I have no reason to doubt these accusations as the dates and messages correspond the action taken against the account. Further as per discussion on the "proposed deletion page" there has been at least one account deleted for what is described as "sockpuppetry".

To look at these yourself please visit:

New to Oslo Facebook Group which is the primary platfrom for foreign speaking workers in the country

The Circus Bazaar Company Instagram Page.

Monsieur Loya (talk) 10:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the screenshots on Instagram, the messages appear to be the work of a spammer/scammer—we see activity like this frequently. These scam artists are not connected with anyone worth listening to on Wikipedia, have no power over the content or existence of the article, and can be safely ignored. --Finngall ^talk 14:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Circus Bazaar Magazine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Circus Bazaar Magazine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circus Bazaar Magazine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Please note that I have completed the nomination on behalf of the IP editor who had PROD-tagged the article previously and have not yet formed an opinion of my own on whether the article should be kept. You are, of course, welcome to comment at the discussion page linked above, but I recommend that any arguments thereon focus on the references supporting the notability of the article and related policy issues--simply dismissing the nominator and anyone else in favor of deleting the article as "bad faith actors" without strong evidence is not likely to be taken seriously and may backfire. I hope this helps. Thank you for your time. --Finngall ^talk 23:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zac Rogers

Hello, Monsieur Loya. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zac Rogers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zac Rogers

Hello, Monsieur Loya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zac Rogers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 22:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Soussan, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent promotion of Circus Bazaar Magazine and individuals affiliated with the periodical.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]