User talk:Moin dadamiya

Concern regarding Draft:Sana Malik Shaikh

Hello, Moin dadamiya. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sana Malik Shaikh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sana Malik Shaikh (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sana Malik Shaikh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 10:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moin dadamiya! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 10:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sana Malik Shaikh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sana Malik Shaikh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jamiebuba (talk) 10:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sana Malik Shaikh moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sana Malik Shaikh. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sana Malik Shaikh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sana Malik Shaikh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro talk 14:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Moin dadamiya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for creating the article "Sana Malik Shaikh" on 7 September 2024. At the time, I believed the subject met Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Recently, on 23 November 2024, Wikipedia has created an article titled "Sana Malik," which appears to reference the same person or topic. Given this, I request reconsideration of my block, as the notability of the subject is now acknowledged by Wikipedia. I assure you that I will follow Wikipedia's guidelines closely in the future. Thank you. Moin dadamiya (talk) 14:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was blocked for creating the article "Sana Malik Shaikh" on 7 September 2024. At the time, I believed the subject met Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Recently, on 23 November 2024, Wikipedia has created an article titled "Sana Malik," which appears to reference the same person or topic. Given this, I request reconsideration of my block, as the notability of the subject is now acknowledged by Wikipedia. I assure you that I will follow Wikipedia's guidelines closely in the future. Thank you. [[User:Moin dadamiya|Moin dadamiya]] ([[User talk:Moin dadamiya#top|talk]]) 14:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked for creating the article "Sana Malik Shaikh" on 7 September 2024. At the time, I believed the subject met Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Recently, on 23 November 2024, Wikipedia has created an article titled "Sana Malik," which appears to reference the same person or topic. Given this, I request reconsideration of my block, as the notability of the subject is now acknowledged by Wikipedia. I assure you that I will follow Wikipedia's guidelines closely in the future. Thank you. [[User:Moin dadamiya|Moin dadamiya]] ([[User talk:Moin dadamiya#top|talk]]) 14:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked for creating the article "Sana Malik Shaikh" on 7 September 2024. At the time, I believed the subject met Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Recently, on 23 November 2024, Wikipedia has created an article titled "Sana Malik," which appears to reference the same person or topic. Given this, I request reconsideration of my block, as the notability of the subject is now acknowledged by Wikipedia. I assure you that I will follow Wikipedia's guidelines closely in the future. Thank you. [[User:Moin dadamiya|Moin dadamiya]] ([[User talk:Moin dadamiya#top|talk]]) 14:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Moin dadamiya (talk) 14:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is your connection to Sana Malik? -- asilvering (talk) 21:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am her husband Moin dadamiya (talk) 17:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that means you have a conflict of interest with regards to her article. Please read WP:COI carefully, then tell me what you will do if you think that changes need to be made to her article. Thanks. -- asilvering (talk) 17:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, including WP:COI. Sana Malik Shaikh has recently been elected to the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, and it is important to ensure that her article reflects accurate and up-to-date information.

To avoid any conflict of interest, I will not make edits directly to the article. Instead, I will provide reliable sources and suggestions for changes on the article's talk page. This way, independent editors can evaluate and implement the updates as appropriate. I appreciate your guidance in ensuring that the article remains neutral and well-sourced. Moin dadamiya (talk) 17:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Moin dadamiya, that's what ChatGPT says. I would like to hear the answer from you, since this doesn't convince me that you understand what you actually need to do if you want to update the article. -- asilvering (talk) 17:27, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]