User talk:Mnzlpoudar

June 2014

Hello, I'm Quenhitran. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Raj Group because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 10:14, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at R.S.C. Anderlecht. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Materialscientist (talk) 09:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mnzlpoudar, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mnzlpoudar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Your addition to Yadav has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You copy/pasted a huge chunk of content from this, which isn't even a reliable source anyway. Please do not do it again. Thanks. Sitush (talk) 16:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Josve05a. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Kumari (children), with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. (t) Josve05a (c) 03:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism at Kumari (children), possible abuse of multiple accounts

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Per your recent blanking at Kumari (children). If you are in fact the same person as Manzilfnl you should not be editing Wikipedia at all. Blanking articles is a good way to get the attention of administrators and does not presage a long career for you here. Please think about whether your behavior makes any sense. EdJohnston (talk) 03:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And only hours after being warned about copyright issues, you go do it again here. Please do not copy/paste content from sources unless they explicitly say that they allow you to do so. - Sitush (talk) 06:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Need to hear your response

Hello Mnzlpoudar. Many admins would block you without further ado. If you plan to continue working here, it would be in your interest to promise to observe copyright and to stop deleting article content with no explanation. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Samita Bajracharya

Hello Mnzlpoudar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Samita Bajracharya for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Chris Fynn (talk) 19:19, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]