User talk:Mm22902

July 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Robvanvee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, American Recordings (record label), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rob van vee 08:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that in this edit to Gene Ween, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Gene Ween[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gene Ween, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:45, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mm22902. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 16:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noting for the record that I have changed this to a regular sockpuppetry block, not a CU block. To be clear, the CU evidence was consistent with the two accounts being operated by two separate people, but they were obviously coordinating which brings us into WP:MEAT territory, and likely WP:UPE as well. Girth Summit _(blether) 10:30, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]