User talk:Miteloot

Welcome!

Hello, Miteloot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 23:31, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Avram. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tatars, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Avram (talk) 05:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kazakhs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach a dead end, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JesseRafe (talk) 22:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tatars. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —Bey WHEELZ ^Let It _RIP!✉📝^Sign 23:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Miteloot reported by User:BeywheelzLetItRip (Result: ). Thank you. —Bey WHEELZ ^Let It _RIP!✉📝^Sign 23:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Miteloot_reported_by_User:BeywheelzLetItRip_.28Result:_Warned_user.28s.29.29 and note the warning. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Miteloot reported by User:JesseRafe (Result: ). Thank you. JesseRafe (talk) 02:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JesseRafe: Just to let you know, I filed an earlier report a few hours ago for a 3RR violation on Tatars. —Bey WHEELZ ^Let It _RIP!✉📝^Sign 03:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reading that now. Didn't even notice it as I had filed this one just from reviewing my Watchlist and their contributions to see if they made any comments. Obviously the warning that was filed above as a resolution to that report was insufficient, as user had already been warned. Cheers, JesseRafe (talk) 03:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are risking a block per the complaint at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Miteloot reported by User:JesseRafe (Result: ) about Kazakhs. There may still be time for you to respond and promise to wait for consensus before changing the article again. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Uzbeks. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About the Kyrgyz

I don't want to engage in any further edit warring with your or report you (eventually leading you to stop editing Wikipedia ) because based on the warnings you received you're close to getting close to the breaking point of being blocked that's why I send you this message to prevent it. Do you have any study that claims " almost 60% East Eurasian " for most Kyrgyz? We can also discuss this on the Kyrgyz wiki talk page and let a moderator decide this.

I have several studies that shows they are far above 60% East Eurasian ancestry

Based on the Central Asia study by Martinez. You can see Kyrgyz have 60% East Asian, 63% East Asian, 65% East Asian, 70% East Asian,

In the heartland of Eurasia: the multilocus genetic landscape of Central Asian populations Begoña Martínez-Cruz

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3025785/

Map of the Kyrgyz diverse groups of DNA http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Ish7688voT0/TJCuJVizYSI/AAAAAAAAClY/KT6PkWSIZnM/s1600/centralasianmartinez.jpg

And in this study East Eurasian can even be between 70-75% in most of them

http://i64.tinypic.com/11vp7k5.jpg

Similar sources are seen from Khazaria. http://www.khazaria.com/genetics/kyrgyz.html

DerekHistorian (talk) 15:10, 17 January 2017

January 2018

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Marat Kabayev, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 12:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Timur Ibragimov. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 07:25, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Volga Tatars. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 07:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eushta

The article Eushta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't find any sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Septrillion (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continual problems with deletions, unsourced edits, and failure to communicate..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 11:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]