User talk:Mister sparky/archive03

Adele "19" UK Sales

Oops, Sorry about that i took the reference from the album page sales update without checking, my bad. --Duphin (talk) 21:08, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Season 8 Favorite Performances (Adam Lambert album)

Please contribute to the discuss whether or not this article should be deleted at its articles for deletion page. Thank you! ℥^nding·start 14:36, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Jennifer Hudson discography

Thanks Mister sparky, and on everything else, too! Best, --Discographer (talk) 21:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

hey, thanks :) been keeping an eye on my edits then? Mister sparky (talk) 21:43, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Some. Been thinking about adding you to my talk page list of valuable editors I like, and find quite inportant in articles I'm interested in, as well as doing a really good job on them. It's good to be interested in a variety of music and musical artists, and many different things for that matter! Best, --Discographer (talk) 21:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Images

Hey i was just wondering (since you seem to know a lot about how Wikipedia works) if images that artists post online (E.G on twitter, Facebook, Myspace etc) are allowed to be posted in articles? or is that against the rules (i forget the exact term) lol --Duphin (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Take That Discography

Hey mate, just wanted to thank you for breaking up the singles into two parts. I was meaning to do that for ages but never got round to it haha. With the Take That Ireland charting the Hung Meiden source suprisingly has no positions for any singles or albums from Take That, but if you check the IRMA database then it'll all be on there. I live in Ireland and know that every studio album apart from the first one has gone number 1, exactly the same as the UK. Anyways, just wanted to pop by and say hi and say I appreciate your work on the Discography. Hope all is well, Dan Yids2010 (talk) 21:27, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

hey, as i said before there are no reliable sources for albums pre-2000. so they can't be included cuz there's no way to prove it. you've also just added back a few things i mentioned on your talk that i'm gonna have to remove again... Mister sparky (talk) 21:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

OK fair play I understand, but why are you removing the sources for 2x platinum in Ireland for Never Forget and the Gold certifications in Italy and Denmark for The Flood. I have just checked the sources again and they are completely black and white. Yids2010 (talk) 21:40, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

I have just seen the message you left on my talk page haha. Thats fine, no worries but for the 2x platinum Never Forget it is on the multi platinum part of the page. With the Danish and Italian ceritifactions of The Flood they are on the page if you scroll down about half way Yids2010 (talk) 21:51, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

No worries mate! If you look down towards the end of the source I referenced for The Flood certified as Gold in Italy you will see it. Its highlighted in blue if that helps. Yids2010 (talk) 22:19, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Just popped by to say you are doing a great job with the Take That discography and keeping it from being abused and fabricated. Good job! Yids2010 (talk) 14:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

21

Hi there. We've never met before, but I see from the list of contributors for the aforementioned page that you're one of the top contributors. And I also see that you have a lot of featured content under your belt. Congrats! I too have a couple featured articles, and I treasure them ;) The reason for me barging in on your page is that I could use your help (as much or as little as you can manage). I'm currently trying to get Adele's 21 to featured article status. It's coming along pretty well. Right now I'm in the process of throwing content on the page. I'm not yet ready to polish the prose, so if it sounds rusty (which it does) don't mind that. Anyway, I was wondering you'd take a look at the article and offer whatever help you can: whether on prose, content, ideas, sources, you name it. Thanks. Orane (talk) 08:40, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Pet Shop Boys discography

I am afraid you are mistaken about images in discographies.

Many images were deleted there because they were images of album covers, which are copyrighted. The image in question is taken from Commons, where only non-copyrighted stuff is allowed. Lothar Klaic (talk) 22:41, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

that was not the problem with the image.Mister sparky (talk) 22:43, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

I didn't track the discussion before; see my new comment in article talk page. In any case, instead of tug-of-war you both have to follow wikipedia:dispute resolution advices. Lothar Klaic (talk) 22:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Amy Winehouse discography

Thanks for adding the EP section!
Ulmanor (talk) 19:44, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

no problem :) i found another one too. Mister sparky (talk) 19:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I hadn't heard about that one before. And I can't seem to buy it legally from the US… It's a little frustrating.
Ulmanor (talk) 02:16, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

So I've asked this question to Tbhotch and now I ask you:

I can't find where it says that there is a maximum limit of 10 countries for music chart tables. Please let me know where it states this. Thanks.--Canadianforever! (talk) 00:59, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:DISCOGSTYLE and WP:CONSENSUS a long time ago. the article follows the guidelines in every other way and there's no reason why it shouldn't do this time. and btw, using more than 1 account to undo edits is not advised. Mister sparky (talk) 01:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Well, thanks for the info. This certainly states the rules more clearly than what I got from Tbhotch. However, it says "approximately" 10 and not exactly 10. So therefore, if we were to comply with those rules, having an 11th country wouldn't hurt. I also read that the 10 most important countries should be included, important being defined as where the artist charted most successfully. She charted more successfully in Canada than say, Australia. By the way, in regards to your last sentence, let's refrain from making snide and disrespectful remarks. It's a long story, but I had to make an account since I realized that it was more proper to use a named account. Thanks again for the info. It was helpful.--Canadianforever! (talk) 17:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

it's also against WP:INDISCRIMINATE only to include countries where she has had the most success. it's meant to be a broad spectrum. and i do apologise, the comment wasn't meant in a disrespectful way. Mister sparky (talk) 18:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Adele 21 sales

Hi, i was thinking about your objection that "estimated" ww sales of 8 m copies are no "actual" sales: if they had written "around" 8 m copies, would you have been questioning it too? since the billboard article posted "21" sold "more than 7 m" units one month ago, it's quite realistic that it has reached the 8 m mark. best mahoney — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahoneyx (talk • contribs) 09:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

FYI

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:16, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

PROD removed at Best Night

An anonymous user has removed the {{prod}} tag from Best Night, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! mechamind90 06:18, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

BSBOfficialEditor

I notice that you recently warned BSBOfficialEditor about disruptive editing at Tinie Tempah discography. I thought I would let you know that BSBOfficialEditor has been for some time doing the same sort of thing at List of Law & Order: UK episodes. S/he repeatedly adds copyrighted summaries that and also saves the version of the page as s/he last edited and so each time s/he makes the change it also eliminates all edits that have been made subsequently. This editor has refused repeatedly to discuss the edits s/he makes and just keeps coming back with them again and again. I have no sort of admin position here and don't know how bans on editors are decided, but I thought I'd let you know of other disruptions from the same person in case you do. Thanks. 142 and 99 (talk) 15:04, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Excuse Me?

Rather than threatening 2 block me 4 editing which u disagreed with and was NOT vandalism, could we take this 2 the discussion page of Dannii Minogue discography, see wat others hav 2 say? Just because ur a senior editor doesn't mean ur right :( .--Meluvseveryone (talk) 00:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

this is an encyclopaedia, not a fanpage that only shows her at her most successful. removing huge swathes of sourced content for that reason is vandalism. Mister sparky (talk) 17:04, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Leona Lewis discography

Hello, I'm sorry, but I didn't know who else to turn to. I've noticed you edit a number of discogs that I used to outline this certain discography (leona lewis). I spent hours editing and tweeking this discog up, just to have all of it RV. Now, I know the person who rv'd the edits is obviously quite high up on the level of editing articles ect. I mean look at him (you'll know who i mean), and i respect him ect, but why is he doing this? I mean, obviously his layout isn't wrong, but i thought it was dated? Not only is it the layout ect, but i correctly sourced a lot of info and removed a alot of false information. Anyway, I was just hoping you could look at this, and tell me whether I'm in the right or wrong? If i'm in the wrong, i accept that.. but i just want a bigger insight. Thankyou. MusicFan94 (talk) 01:59, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

hey, it seems as though the majority of the edits that you made to the page have been changed back to the way you put them. which i do agree with. it did need changing, i was going to do it myself but never got around to it. but yes anemone is a good editor, he must've had his reasons. but thanks for asking for my opinion :) Mister sparky (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Only just seen this.. haha thanks. and i only did the wanted discography edit as i read Wikipedia:discography and it said that you have to separate other charted songs from singles.MusicFan94 (talk) 21:49, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Content disagreements are not vandalism

For completely unrelated reasons, your recent warnings to BSBOfficialEditor with respect to Tinie Tempah discography have come to my attention. I can appreciate that you do not agree with the edits made by BSBOfficialEditor; however, they are not vandalism by any definition used on this project. (From Wikipedia:Vandalism: "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism.") They are disputed content, and the appropriate step is to discuss the edits on the talk page of the article, and to invite the other editor to participate in the discussion. Please refrain from using the term "vandalism" in this way. I hope you'll take this under consideration in the future. Thanks. Risker (talk) 19:04, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Domino

Head on over to iTunes to download Jessie J's new US single "Domino" TODAY!. Seems to be confirmation to me.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Hello Mister sparky! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 20:11, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KirkleyHigh

Hi Mister sparky! I know you contribute on the same articles than BSBOfficialEditor, and that you asked for sockpuppet investigations about KirkleyHigh or his socks in the past. Perhaps your comments would be appreciated at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KirkleyHigh. Regards, --Europe22 (talk) 18:02, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Examples Discography Page TomLawrence9 14:57, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Example Discography

I am not 'Valdalising' examples discography page, the UK chart positions have got 3 collums for dance and indie, i think its a better idea to replace them with other countries the UK having 3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomlawrence95 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

sorry vandalism was a bit harsh. when he's had more chart success elsewhere then yea i agree definitely. but changing it now would leave most of the table empty which is pointless. Mister sparky (talk) 16:43, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Fatboy Slime discography

I see things have been quiet there for the last few days. I'm keeping an eye on it. Is it simply a table-formatting dispute? - eo (talk) 15:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Robbie Williams discography

I am really not planning to get into this page (as a matter of fact I am not even watching it), but I must say I don't understand this edit. All these certifications seem valid. There is no guideline I am aware of saying only certifications for regions where a peak is registered should be listed. On the contrary, it is common to list all certifications regardless of peak. I'm not even sure there was a European chart for that period. Furthermore, one could say adding EU is even better than all the countries within, as it gives a better perception of the total sales. Anyway, as I said, I am not going to go into this, it just seems very unusual. --Muhandes (talk) 10:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

it's very common. and is a requirement of every featured list discussion. the certifications should only be listed of the countries shown in the article. the albums/singles article lists all of them. Mister sparky (talk) 11:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Well, this would not be the first time featured content goes by unwritten guidelines (I am not saying it is a bad thing, mind you). I found the proposal they are probably relying on. One learns new things every day. Thanks, best regards, and happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 12:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Official Charts Company

It would appear from your edit comment that you were trying to get this redirect deleted so as to move another page to this title. If that is the case you should follow one of the procedures at WP:Requested moves. If you believe the move to be uncontroversial {{db-move}} might be the way to go. You should not use inappropriate speedy criteria or otherwise attempt to do an end around proper procedures. Dpmuk (talk) 22:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Mister sparky. You have new messages at Calvin999's talk page.
Message added 01:25, 12 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Calvin • ^TalkThatTalk 01:25, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Lol

Did you delete comments from me, as well as you, because you realised you are wrong? Calvin • ^TalkThatTalk 01:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

no, it is because i also have a life outside of editing this and can't be bothered.Mister sparky (talk) 23:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Official web sites

Hey! I agree with you re official web site sources. They are the most accurate. I looked at WP:ELOFFICIAL WP:ELRC... what do you think?! TopopMAC1 (talk) 23:42, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

i think it depends what you are wanting to source with them. for sales figures and such they should not be used because they're obviously going to be biased. but for things like next single announcements, release dates etc they're perfectly acceptable. Mister sparky (talk) 23:49, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Couldn't agree more! TopopMAC1 (talk) 22:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Disco 4

Sorry about the edit I made to Remix album section of Pet Shop Boys discography. Could you help me in how to add a new column? Would like to add one next to the UK Albums Chart column. Thanks. PSBmad (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:56, 13 November 2011 (UTC).

that colum doesnt belong there. the info belongs on the albums page. there is also no way of sourcing the compilation albums chart. Mister sparky (talk) 21:58, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

There is a source for the UK Compilation Chart because I included the link in my changes. A Wikipedia page of it does exist. Also the Pet Shop Boys discography has the singles and albums all together not separated to individual albums and singles pages. PSBmad 11:07, 17 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PSBmad (talk • contribs)

the occ archive only goes back to 2009, and the album apparently charted in 2007. so no there is no way of sourcing it. and by 'albums page' i mean here. Mister sparky (talk) 23:43, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

The Tunbridge Wells Hospital

Simply put, do not engage in a page move war. I have very little tolerance for such disruption, and will block you if you continue. Please move your concerns to the article's talk page and gain consensus if other editors disagree with your page move. Tiptoety ^talk 00:42, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Sort of agree, the process is WP:BRD, not WP:BRRD. That said, I wouldn't be quite so quick with the banhammer unless I had found that you had a history of page move wars. Anyway, I've raised a move request which should show up at WP:RM before long. You are welcome to add your comments at Talk:The Tunbridge Wells Hospital#Requested move giving your reasons for opposing the move back to Pembury Hospital. Mjroots (talk) 08:11, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

to tiptoety - excuse me? a block warning and called a vandal for moving an article to the correct place...? am i missing something here? as i stated in the move summary, it's the hospitals new official name as defined by the nhs and the signs outside the hospital, not mine. if people disagree with the name then they should bring it up with the nhs and owners of the place not me. Mister sparky (talk) 23:46, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

I did not call you a vandal, nor did I give you a warning for moving an article to what you perceive to be the correct name. I warned you because you were starting to engage in a move war and did not want to see it escalate into being disruptive. If I had thought you were a "vandal" I wouldn't have dropped you a warning here, I just would have blocked. Like Mjroots stated above though, you don't have a history of such disruptive actions, hence no block. I see that you have now taken your concerns to the article's talk page, which was the ultimate goal of my warning. I'll leave you two to it now. Happy editing, Tiptoety ^talk 04:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)