User talk:Mimich

Welcome!

Hello, Mimich, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! · j e r s y k o talk · 18:26, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same-sex marriage legislation in the United States by state

Situation before

I just took a look at what you're up to with this article and I have to say I don't like it. There's too much formatting, way too many generalized links and some POV. Please stop, return it to it's former version and discuss the changes you want to make on the talk page. CovenantD 08:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ANSWER :
What do you mean in detail about POV ? All I am doing is filling the page according to the title : Same-sex marriage legislation in the United States by state. It was so far rather a timeline according to each state ... My point of view is neutral. I report what I find. And the links goes either to "pro-marriage" HRC and "against-marriage" Domawatch.org . I wouldn't have done it otherwise! The links are also made to allow checking and upodating if necessary. Mimich 09:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't checked every single state, but what I have seen can be generally applied to all of them.

What caught my eye on POV was this line:

ARIZONA CONSTITUTION :

Nothing. The ballot on a possible constitution ban failed narrowly. The only failure case in USA !

The bold formatting could also be contrued as POV, since it doesn't necessarily appear in the source documentation.

As for the linking, there is absolutely no reason to link each and every state to the DOMA Watch and HRC. A single link to each organization at the end of the article is sufficient and keeping with guidelines. Another example of overlinking is the link to Alabama Constitution. That article contains nothing relevant to SSM and that puts it out of context. There's also no need to link to both the entire state constitution and the specific section that pertains to this article. The code or statute links are also duplicated in the generalities links, which is all duplicated by including the full text. This supposed to be summaries. I hope that gives you enough to get started. See Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context, and especially the first couple of paragraphs, for more guidance. CovenantD 10:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The links to HRC and DOMAWATCH refers not to the general site homepage but to each state individual page! It takes much time to report all those legislation so I have put each state page on both sites so that anyone that comes may have an answer already by consulting them. Maybe I should withdraw them latter.

For Arizona : How about "Nothing. Through a ballot with a narrow result, the Arizonians didn't agree to ban same-sex marriages in their constitution. The only such case in USA so far !" ? It wasn't my intention to stress it as a failure. But it rather referred to the context. There is a general push to ban them from each state constitution. It was meant to say : "In each state this general move and attitude succeeded but not in Arizona."

This text is added after first comment without the adding.

The bold elements were to point major elements of the legislation. What are the key informations of it

First of all, don't start out by yelling at me as though I don't know what's going on. It's rude and won't earn you any friends.

What you've done with HRC and DOMA is excessive. Each organization has a main "legislation by state" page. Link to that at the bottom and it will only take a reader one extra click to get where they want without cluttering the page with 50 links with exactly the same text.

As for Arizona, that was an example of POV. You shouldn't be including the text of the statute or code or amendment in this article at all anyway. Bolding only indicates what YOU think are the key elements. That's the very definition of POV. Your task as an editor is to just report the facts and let the reader decide what is import to them. CovenantD 12:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is already the status page which gives a summary of the legal elements. So this page should be something else according to opinions the talk page of the legislation page : short timeline and clear legislation. I considered gathering here the full legislative texts in a glance, as it was named legislation and the other status.
There was no yelling intention, just stressing to be sure the links intention was clear as you said you hadn't considered the all page but only the first sections of the page, or so I understood ... Mimich 12:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done, I suppose ... another thing I am working on
User:Mimich/Sandbox 1 is a partial preparation for the Same-sex marriage status in the United States by state page (here above, status page), what do you think of it (except overlinking I'm already working on)?
My intention was, among other things, :

to correct and enhance clearer details of the status page.
to propose a fixed denomination for all possible pages (marriage - civil unions - domestic partnership) and through it, to show existing pages (=active links). maybe excessive but potentially useful

A lot has yet to be done but tell me Mimich 16:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Age category

Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:

Using an age group category, such as Category:Wikipedians in their 30s
Using a decade category, such as Category:Wikipedians born in the 1970s.

If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 12:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aníbal Acevedo Vilá.jpg

Hello, Mimich. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Aníbal Acevedo Vilá.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Mimich/Sandbox 5. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maps of Same Sex Marriage in US Discussion

Hi Mimich. I have started a discussion about a new SSM map that has recently been replaced on many pages that reference same sex marriage laws in the US. I have also brought up some complaints about the feature creep of the US Map Same Sex Civil Unions and Domestic Partnerships and US Map Same Sex Marriage Laws maps on which you have made significant contributions. I would recommend that the new US SSM Laws image be deleted due to its major flaws and that the previous two images that it has been replacing be used instead, but in a simplified form. My reasons are given on the US SSM Laws talk page. Cheers.--Burzum 20:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your recent edits to Ages of consent in North America

Hi, the information you've added to the article is all very good, however it would be best if you would use prose instead of dot points and sentence fragments. Especially the line in Alaska "=> "16<->19", "17<=>20" & "both above 18" is all right." That means nothing to most people. Please try to reword your additions in line with the WP:MoS. Also have a quick look at the guide at the top of the talk page regarding this. We are trying to get all the "Ages of consent in..." articles to have a consistent style and presentation. --Monotonehell 14:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide an edit summary for your edits

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. -- SchreyP ^(messages) 04:27, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. When you recently edited List of state visits received by Queen Elizabeth II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shahanshah of Iran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Knights of the Order of Ojaswi Rajanya has been nominated for renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page.

Re:

Thanks for u're contribution on the voice Mimich, but i've not informations to change the pagename for Elizabeth Theresia Order, 'cause for exemple as u can see in wikipedia.pl "Order Elżbiety Teresy" or in wikipedia.nel "Elisabeth-Theresia-Orde" there are version recalling the precise name. There are a lot of orders with similar names to other all stays to be precise in identification i think. --79.31.129.97 (talk) 08:13, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Order of Elizabeth and Theresa

Thanks for creating Order of Elizabeth and Theresa, Mimich!

Wikipedia editor Pigsonthewing has tagged the page as having some issues to fix. In addition, they wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating a new article. It's a good one but please add References if you can. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:44, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

The tags on the page can be removed by you or another editor when the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on Pigsonthewing's talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the the Teahouse.

Learn more about page curation.

Not "Sir"

Your recent contributions seem to have a misconception of what an honorary UK knighthood means for a non-Commonwealth citizen - e.g. Chirac, Eisenhower. They are not called "Sir". See the note on the Bob Geldof page. - Ttwaring (talk) 18:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, I'm E4024. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! E4024 (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I may have exaggerated, sorry. See the talk above mine. All the best.

E4024 (talk) 19:37, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IMSC Order of Merit

Proposed deletion of IMSC Order of Merit

Hello, Mimich. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, IMSC Order of Merit, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Danielj2705 (talk) 12:36, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contest Proposed Deletion of IMSC Order of Merit

The content of the page matches exactly with the text on http://www.cism-milsport.org/eng/002_ABOUT_CISM/Awards/Awards.asp and due to WP:NPS and WP:PLAG the article will have to be re-wrtiten to not exactly mimic but for now I am nominating the article in AfD Danielj2705 (talk) 13:31, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about IMSC Order of Merit

Hello, Mimich,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether IMSC Order of Merit should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMSC Order of Merit .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Danielj2705 (talk) 13:36, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Order of the Dragon King

Hi. The image you link to on the page can be uploaded under a Non Free file usage - just select Official Symbol. Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please add sources to articles that you create?

Thank you for adding several interesting knighthood order articles such as Order of the Belt of Hope and Order of Hubert. Many of these article include the text similar to "Ackermann mentions this knighthood order as a historical order of France."

Unfortunately, we don't know who Ackermann is. If that is the source, could you add a source citation? I think the articles that you are adding are valuable, but without sources they may be deleted.

Thanks so much for your help! - Mr X 01:49, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	Thank you for adding citations to your recently created articles. This goes a long way toward improving the encyclopedia. Please accept this well-deserved barnstar in recognition of your efforts. - Mr X 23:56, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ODM-List-Country

Template:ODM-List-Country has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Noiratsi (talk) 13:38, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Order of the White Lady (France)

Hi, I'm Kieranian2001. Mimich, thanks for creating Order of the White Lady (France)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Reviewed as part of page curation, interesting short article. Needs additional citations/references for verification.Kieranian2001 (talk) 13:48, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

List of Knights of the Order of the Elephant

Hi Mimich. Nice job with this extensive article. Can I just check one point with you, Frederick Francis IV, Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Schwerin is listed twice on the list, 3. August 1897 & 7. June 1929, is the 1929 award perhaps meant to be his son Friedrich Franz, Hereditary Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Schwerin? - dwc lr (talk) 18:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of honours of the Jordanian Royal Family by country/persons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to National Order of Merit and Order of the White Eagle

Abdullah II of Jordan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Order of the White Eagle

List of honours of the Jordanian Royal Family by country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to National Order of Merit

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Linking

Hi Mimich: thanks for your work. Please note that on en.WP, years, dates, and common terms are not usually linked. Best. Tony (talk) 11:45, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of post-nominal letters (Portugal)

Hi, I'm Matty.007. Mimich, thanks for creating List of post-nominal letters (Portugal)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Just needs some references, then looks good

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mat ty.007 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please use Wikdiata for interwikis

Hello Mimich, On the Dutch Wikipedia we are cleaning up the use of local interwikis and do not want to use local interwikis any longer. Please use Wikidata for interwikis instead of putting interwikis on templates, categories and articles. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 17:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mandela awards "orders" section

Hi. I believe you added this section: List of awards and honours bestowed upon Nelson Mandela § Summary of his Orders some time ago. Can you clarify/comment at Talk:List of awards and honours bestowed upon Nelson Mandela § Summary of his Orders? —[AlanM1(talk)]— 01:48, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creating articles

Thank you for wishing to add to Wikipedia. It appears that you have created several articles (such as List of post-nominal letters (Pahang)) which are not completed. Please do not publish an article unless you are finished with it. For testing, creating draft articles etc please use your sandbox. See Wikipedia:User pages and Wikipedia:Starting an article for more information. Coinmanj (talk) 07:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion

I have nominated two articles for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria CSD G2. Coinmanj (talk) 07:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of post-nominal letters (Perak)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.

Speedy deletion nomination of List of post-nominal letters (Pahang)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tengku Ampuan Rahimah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Klang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Knights Grand Companion of the Order of Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin of Terengganu (Malaysia)

Category:Knights Grand Companion of the Order of Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin of Terengganu (Malaysia), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:51, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of honours of the Norwegian Royal Family by country may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''See also [[List of German Honours awarded to Heads of State and Royals]]]''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:46, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of honours of the Dutch Royal Family by country may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

=== {{HonHeads|Bulgaria|1971}} ([[People's Republic of Bulgaria]] ===
with Collar (27/03/1985) of the [[Order of Merit of the Italian Republic]] <ref>Italian Presidency], [http://www.quirinale.it/elementi/DettaglioOnorificenze.aspx?decorato=34917 S.A.R. Beatrice

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of honours of Portugal awarded to heads of state and royals may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CfD

Please keep speaking up for your WikiProject, honors and awards. You have a substantial knowledge of the area that is absent in regular discussion at Categories for Discussion. I invite your active participation! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:28, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Preventing deletion before listifying

A lot of times discussions on categories close with "listify". This is a decision to turn the category into a list and then remove it. If you want this outcome you are heavily encouraged to express these views in the CfD discussion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of honours of Estonia awarded to heads of state and royals may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

bearers.php?id=14 Estonian State Decorations - Kuninganna Silvia]</ref> - First Class of the [[Order of the White Star] (18/01/2011)<ref>Official website of the President of Estonia ''([[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:05, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of honours of Estonia awarded to heads of state and royals may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Order of the Cross of Terra Mariana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andris Bērziņš (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Order of the Cross of Terra Mariana, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Allen and David Gill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Order of the Cross of Terra Mariana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jacques Faure (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An old template up for deletion

Nomination for deletion of Template:Same-sex legal relationships in USA

Template:Same-sex legal relationships in USA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dralwi k|^{Have a Chat} 19:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:HonHeadsCommonwealth

Template:HonHeadsCommonwealth has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DrKiernan (talk) 20:43, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Day.

They deal regularly with the theme of King Albert Second. I have a question. Fondation <Aide victime> is the royal a fund? Follow generous compensation, compensations, peace monies as quickly, uncomplicated, light as royale sanctions? An old friend royale friends asked me. And. Frage, You e specialist. Gudod (talk) 14:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting / inventive / inovative Category sorting

Very interesting! (I've not seen it used that way before.) I must admit, my first reaction was to classify it as vandalism - I'm glad I checked it out before putting my foot in my mouth. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 23:21, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of the Dames of the Order of Queen Maria Luisa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vasa, Potemkin and Bardi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 14 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of honours of the Spanish Royal Family by country page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of the Dames of the Order of Queen Maria Luisa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I happened to notice...

You have two pages, one called User:Mimich/Sandbox 3 an done called User:Mimich/Sandbox3. If you lost one of them, that is why. The same applies for 1 and 2. Keep up the great work! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC).

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Morganne Matis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The White Queen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsey Middleton

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lindsey Middleton, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://en.wikimore.tomodo.me/wiki/Will_Conlon.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Corey Lof

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Corey Lof, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://en.wikimore.tomodo.me/wiki/Will_Conlon.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wendy Glazier

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Wendy Glazier, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://en.wikimore.tomodo.me/wiki/Will_Conlon.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grand Masters of the Order of Loyalty to Sultan 'Abdu'l Halim Mu'azzam Shah has been nominated for discussion

Category:Grand Masters of the Order of Loyalty to Sultan 'Abdu'l Halim Mu'azzam Shah, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grand Masters of the Decoration for Services to the Republic of Austria has been nominated for discussion

Category:Grand Masters of the Decoration for Services to the Republic of Austria, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:06, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of Elizabeth has been nominated for discussion

Category:Order of Elizabeth, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grand Masters of the Order of Merit (Cameroon) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Grand Masters of the Order of Merit (Cameroon), which you created, has been nominated for deletion of this and 34 other categories from 12 other countries. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:59, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of Sultan Qaboos has been nominated for discussion

Category:Order of Sultan Qaboos, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 09:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mimich. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Commanders of the Order of the Crown of Tonga has been nominated for discussion

Category:Commanders of the Order of the Crown of Tonga, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:06, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of King George Tupou I has been nominated for discussion

Category:Order of King George Tupou I, which you created, has been nominated for deletion along with 15 similar categories. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:15, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pingat Hassanal Bolkiah Sultan - Darjah Pertama has been nominated for discussion

Category:Pingat Hassanal Bolkiah Sultan - Darjah Pertama, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of Merit of the Principality of Liechtenstein has been nominated for discussion

Category:Order of Merit of the Principality of Liechtenstein, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.RevelationDirect (talk) 04:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of the Colonial Empire has been nominated for discussion

Category:Order of the Colonial Empire, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:44, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of Umayyad has been nominated for discussion

Category:Order of Umayyad, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 12:31, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nepal Pratap Bhaskara has been nominated for discussion

Category:Nepal Pratap Bhaskara, which you created, has been nominated for deletion along with 2 similar awards. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of the Crown (Monaco) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Order of the Crown (Monaco), which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of Saint Charles (Mexico) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Order of Saint Charles (Mexico), which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 04:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of Good Hope has been nominated for discussion

Category:Order of Good Hope, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.RevelationDirect (talk) 04:15, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Order of Al-Said has been nominated for discussion

Category:Recipients of the Order of Al-Said, which you created, has been nominated for deletion along with two other awards. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.RevelationDirect (talk) 01:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:HonHeadsUK

Template:HonHeadsUK has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DrKay (talk) 14:01, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mimich. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Shields (mayor)

The article John Shields (mayor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:POLITICIAN

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 20:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ODM-List-Country

Template:ODM-List-Country has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lojbanist ^{remove cattle from stage} 02:24, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ODM-List-Awarding-Country

Template:ODM-List-Awarding-Country has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lojbanist ^{remove cattle from stage} 02:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mimich. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Topic (South America)

Template:Topic (South America) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of the Republic (Egypt) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Order of the Republic (Egypt), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of the Star of Ghana has been nominated for discussion

Category:Order of the Star of Ghana, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Exalted Order of the Crown of Kedah has been nominated for discussion

Category:Exalted Order of the Crown of Kedah, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Family Order of Terengganu has been nominated for discussion

Category:Family Order of Terengganu, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:40, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Order of Aviz

A tag has been placed on Category:Order of Aviz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:National Order of San Lorenzo

A tag has been placed on Category:National Order of San Lorenzo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of the Loyalty of Sultan Ismail has been nominated for merging

Category:Order of the Loyalty of Sultan Ismail has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:59, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of Vytautas the Great has been nominated for merging

Category:Order of Vytautas the Great has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of Mubarak the Great has been nominated for deletion

Category:Order of Mubarak the Great has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:58, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Order of Muhammad has been nominated for listification

Category:Recipients of the Order of Muhammad has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect (talk) 10:34, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Honorary Members of Xirka Ġieħ ir-Repubblika has been nominated for listification

Category:Honorary Members of Xirka Ġieħ ir-Repubblika has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 09:15, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Supernumerary Knights of the Order of the Holy Spirit has been nominated for deletion

Category:Supernumerary Knights of the Order of the Holy Spirit has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 19:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Tower and Sword has been nominated for deletion

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Tower and Sword has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 23:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Knights of the Order of Saint Michael has been nominated for deletion

Category:Knights of the Order of Saint Michael has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 23:28, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grand Crosses of the Order of May has been nominated for listification

Category:Grand Crosses of the Order of May has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for identifying award recipients

I see you have several notices for award categories and I wanted to thank you for grouping the award recipients together. Since the WP:OCAWARD editing guideline was tightened, I've been working to move this information into the article space. Before nominating award categories, I always copy the contents into a list within the main article so no work is lost.

If my CFD notices ever are cluttering your talk page, just let me know and I'll start omitting them. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grand Crosses of the Order of Carol I has been nominated for deletion

Category:Grand Crosses of the Order of Carol I has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 15:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Supreme Order of the Renaissance has been nominated for listification

Category:Recipients of the Supreme Order of the Renaissance has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grand Crosses of the National Order of San Lorenzo has been nominated for listification

Category:Grand Crosses of the National Order of San Lorenzo has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Crown of the Realm has been nominated for deletion

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Crown of the Realm has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 09:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Order of Sikatuna has been nominated for deletion

Category:Order of Sikatuna has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 03:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ODM-checked

Template:ODM-checked has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ODM-listed

Template:ODM-listed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ODM-added

Template:ODM-added has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ODM-unreferenced

Template:ODM-unreferenced has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dubbing

Template:Dubbing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 05:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Order of Merit (Lebanon) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Recipients of the Order of Merit (Lebanon) has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Baronnet (talk) 13:13, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of honours of the Greek royal family by country for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of honours of the Greek royal family by country is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of honours of the Greek royal family by country until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DrKay (talk) 07:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of honours of the Grand Ducal Family of Luxembourg by country

The article List of honours of the Grand Ducal Family of Luxembourg by country has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unlikely to have any sourcing that isn't primary or non-independent

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoelleJay (talk) 03:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Maltese Queen's Counsel has been nominated for splitting

Category:Maltese Queen's Counsel has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]