User talk:Mile11

September 2024

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Narendra Modi Stadium—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 00:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blidworth Welfare F.C.. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Blidworth Welfare F.C. was changed by Mile11 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885909 on 2024-09-24T01:06:43+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ecolog Arena, you may be blocked from editing. FifthFive (talk) 02:21, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from hijacking pages, as you did with Ecolog Arena. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Please also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Skywatcher68 (talk) 03:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you attempt to make disruptive edits to Wikipedia. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:11, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I try do very good Page for FK Jugohrom, so if previously I was made some mistake will not happend, becouse you already delete some of my inputs, so please be fair player, thank you Mile11 (talk) 01:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Unblock me to finish my editing and i promise will not do any other mistake[[User:Mile11|Mile11]] ([[User talk:Mile11#top|talk]]) 01:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)}}

Здраво ќе ве молам да го разгледате моето барање, статијата ми е од важност Mile11 (talk) 01:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mile11 (talk) 01:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mile11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I try to make good page for FK Jugohrom, and if I do mistake before will not happend again so please try to unblock me to finish my goal Mile11 (talk) 01:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please; you had two. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:49, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 20:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]