User talk:MilanKovacevic

Leave me a message here.

Izmene

Vec smo razgovarali o tome, ubacivanje tolikih zastavica u kutijice je nepotrebno, nepregledno, ne vide se lepo podaci o sportistima. Dovoljno je ostaviti jednu, takva je praksa na engleskoj i srpskoj vikipediji. Zamolio bih te da ne vracas zastavice u clanak. Sve najbolje.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 09:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Is mozzartsport.com in Bosnian or Serbian language? SLBedit (talk) 22:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"mozzartsport" is in English language, in Serbian and Bosnian "mocartsport" or "моцартспорт" -- MilanKovacevic (talk) 23:04, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Partizan in English

Please don't restore this because it is not right. English language has rules when translating foreign names. Languages that use Latin script have their names written in original. Serbian by English language standards has inherited the rules applied for Serbo-Croatian, thus Serbian names are written in Latin original. That is why you see in UEFA draws the name FK Partizan and not FC Partizan. Russian, Bulgarian, Ukrainian, Greek, etc. names of clubs are translated (exemple: FC Dynamo Kiyv) while Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian, Austria, Czech, etc. club names are not translated (exemple FK Austria Wien, GNK Dinamo Zagreb, etc. Thus please don't reinsert the wrng information that FK Partizan in English is FC Partizan because it is not, it is FK Partizan in English. I know many people in Serbia write even in club official websites stupidities like FC Rad, but that is because they are uneducated regarding English language rules and think FC Rad is English and cool, but it is wrong, in English is FK Rad just as in Serbian Latin script. Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 15:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about SRC Pools Smederevo

Hello, MilanKovacevic,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether SRC Pools Smederevo should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SRC Pools Smederevo .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Joel.Miles925 (talk) 19:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NK Sloboda

A tag has been placed on NK Sloboda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 21:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing on dab pages - again

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.

You have been warned numerous times in the past for disruptive editing on dab pages, and I've noticed you haven't learnt any lessons from that. The guidelines are there for a reason, so if you will not respect them, your account will eventually be blocked. You will stop:

Editing dab pages agains WP:MOSDAB guidelines, adding numerous blue links amongst other issues
Redirecting dab pages through cut-and-paste moves without seeking consensus
Stop wikilinking random English nouns, as you did here [1]. It serves no purpose whatsoever to wikilink every word in the English language.
Stop creating, literally, hundreds of redirects with every imaginable mix of large and small caps for no good reason

--Midas02 (talk) 15:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Districts of Germany - overlinking

Hello MilanKovacevic, thank you for your contributions. However, common English terms such as "white" or "rural", that should be understood by every English speaker, are usually not Wiki-linked. Please see WP:OVERLINK for more information. In this specific case, "urban district" and "urban area" are also not completely synonymous in Germany - linking those terms in this context would be a bit misleading. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 14:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. -- MilanKovacevic (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sabahudin kovačevič

Slovenian wikipedia has it this way, why the change?18abruce (talk) 15:17, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it because it is a Croatian name? I didn't think Slovenian used ć, but I am happy to learn.18abruce (talk) 15:31, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Minor things

Milane molm vas ne menjajte "Association football" u "Football (soccer)" ili "Lang-sr-cyr" u "lang-sr-cyr" ako pogledate na taj način pravite direct u redirect. FkpCascais (talk) 16:57, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Izvinite, samo ste dodali link za Football club, izvinite moja greška, pozdrav! FkpCascais (talk) 16:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darko Ristić

The article Darko Ristić has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 01:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MilanKovacevic. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Air strips listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Air strips. Since you had some involvement with the Air strips redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:List of World Heritage Sites in Serbia#Stećci Medieval Tombstones Graveyards

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of World Heritage Sites in Serbia#Stećci Medieval Tombstones Graveyards. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 20:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Romanov listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Romanov. Since you had some involvement with the Romanov redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Style/layout of Serbian translations of article names

Hi. I have noticed your recent work related to new articles about several ski resorts in Serbia and nearby. IMO, it is a good method to use lang template for both sripts of Serbian articles, and not just for one with other being separate with additional italic marks for each in brackets. I have no idea where that practice of yours is coming from; why is there a need to complicate things? Also, there is no need to add multiple (or even any) hyperlinks to well-known term (and geographical/political subject such as is the case for Serbia).--AirWolf ^talk 20:34, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Upit

Postovani Milane,

Dobar dan. Moje ime je Dusan Rajic. . Zadnja dva meseca se raspitujem kako da napisem clanak na Srpskoj vikipediji o brendu za koji radim i o jednoj osobi koja je dosta medijski ispracena ali bih zeleo da bude napisano profesionalno. Kako ne bih ucio kako se pravi stranica, hteo sam da Vas pitam da li Vi pruzate ovu vrstu usluge i da li bi ste bili raspolozeni za saradnju.Jako bi mi znacila Vasa pomoc. Ukoliko ne, da li bi ste mogli da mi preporucite nekoga? Hvala unapred na odgovoru. Zelim Vam prijatan dan. Srdacan pozdrav, Dusan Dusan Rajic (talk) 18:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Belgrade Мunicipalities" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Belgrade Мunicipalities has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Belgrade Мunicipalities until a consensus is reached. 192.76.8.65 (talk) 13:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Tara (reka)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Tara (reka) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 13 § Tara (reka) until a consensus is reached. Joy (talk) 14:14, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Tara (rijeka)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Tara (rijeka) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 13 § Tara (rijeka) until a consensus is reached. Joy (talk) 14:14, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Rijeka Tara" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Rijeka Tara has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 13 § Rijeka Tara until a consensus is reached. Joy (talk) 14:14, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Reka Tara" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Reka Tara has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 13 § Reka Tara until a consensus is reached. Joy (talk) 14:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]