Jump to content

User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 93

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 90Archive 91Archive 92Archive 93Archive 94Archive 95Archive 100

Wikidata weekly summary #622

Tech News: 2024-16

MediaWiki message delivery 23:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #624

Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #152 is out: Welcome, Sharvani!

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we welcome a new member of the team and we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive.

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-17

MediaWiki message delivery 20:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

Commons deletion of photographs of scarecrows in the UK

Please would you kindly look at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests: Please undelete these Minskip files.

Since I took the photographs in the Category:Minskip scarecrow competition 2023, there have been intermittent attempts to delete my photographs. Sometimes my objections have been listened to; sometimes they have been misunderstood or ignored and my photographs (taken with knowledge and verbal permission of the festival director) have been deleted. I believe that the problem is that there has been a lot of misunderstanding of UK law going on.

I understand that the rules for requesting undeleting permit me to request an administrator to take a look at the situation. So I am asking you whether you could please take a look at this. It is very worrying that we have been allowed to photograph e.g. the Lewes Guy Fawkes effigy parade for all these years, and publish those photographs, and we have been allowed to photograph scarecrows all these years, and suddenly one or two people are able to delete our photographs. We really do need some clarity here, so that they and I can know where we stand - and all those people who have uploaded photos of effigies to Commons all these years, also can know where they stand. Thanks.

I should add that maybe definition of terms comes into this. The scarecrow effigies are not created as artworks. They are just a bit of temporary fun. I have personally called them artworks in the image file descriptions, because as naive works they often inadvertently take on some character and even beauty, and really it is the camera work which interprets it that way. If there is any beauty in the effigies, it is unlikely to be appreciated fully by passers by, without the intervention of my camera work. Storye book (talk) 21:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

I see @Billinghurst: is on the case, and is much more of an expert in this than I am. :-) From a quick look, it does look like a bit of a grey area - these aren't simple scarecrows, but almost giant fluffy toys. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. I have not been able to find any contributions link for user Billinghurst, here or on commons, that is associated with the above hundreds of spurious copyright accusation. Please would you kindly ping me to let me know where this is happening? It is not on the main discussion page for the deletion request.
I should add that festival scarecrows in the UK are not defined as toys; also as far as I know, handmade objects like the ones in the photographs are not considered copyright matters under Panoramafreiheit. In RL one of my professions has been a knitting pattern designer. In that trade, the designer has the copyright to the written pages of the knitting pattern. However, traditional stitch patterns (for example, patterns for individual cables that you see on Nordic jumpers or sweaters), are officially not copyright. Also, the designer does not have copyright to knitted jumpers made by purchasers of the pattern. If the knitter who bought the pattern and made their own jumper decided to include their own variation of the pattern (e.g. they added a decorative collar) then that part of it can be copyrighted by them, but the original design pages created by the designer remain the designer's copyright. So basically, we designers only have rights to the pattern pages (including our own photos) that we publish. Now, those stuffies at the scarecrow festivals are almost all handmade (I haven't seen any commercial ones myself). Handmade 3D stuffies photographed from the street in the UK are not subjects for copyright under panoramafreiheit as I understand it. Oh, and festival scarecrows are not commercially copyrighted toys, by any definition. I am not intending here to berate you about the misunderstanding, or to cause you any discomfiture.. But due to being currently hounded on Commons after all my hard and careful work created in good faith and lawful intentions, I do feel that I must make these matters clear to anyone else who may be reading this. Storye book (talk)
Billinghurst's reply was in the first link you shared, commons:Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Please_undelete_these_Minskip_files. It looks like there's ongoing discussion there, that would be the best place to leave your thoughts, but it definitely does sound like a grey area. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Storye book (talk) 20:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #625

Tech News: 2024-18

MediaWiki message delivery 03:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Nyttend
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed Nihonjoe

CheckUser changes

readded Joe Roe

Oversight changes

removed GeneralNotability

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #153 is out: Team meeting and Quarterly plan

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we discuss the results of our team meeting held in San Francisco, USA, as well as presenting the objectives that we will pursue in the next months.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive.

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 12:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Next Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer's Corner is on May 6

We remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next Volunteers' Corner will be held on May 6, at 17:30 UTC (link to the meeting).

Apologies for the reaching out to you with a separate message.

See you at the meeting! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 13:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-19

MediaWiki message delivery 16:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)