User talk:Mi9cal

Welcome!

Hello, Mi9cal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Michael P. Howlett

Heya, this article needs some cleanup; right now it's lacking references, and has a long list in paragraph format that's very hard to read (I've added the appropriate cleanup templates to the page). If this is a notable figure, some sourced biography and background would be useful. Good luck! - superβεεcat 07:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mi9cal! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Michael P. Howlett - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of British Columbia Political Studies Association

The article British Columbia Political Studies Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 17:04, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict?

Hello! I see you are editing several articles related to Michael P Howlett. Do you have a conflict of interest with these articles--i.e. are you him, do you work for him, or do you know him? Please read WP:COI. COI editing sometimes leads to unintended consequences like articles in the wider press of the type "X edits their own" Wikipedia page. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 07:18, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Policy Sciences (Journal)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Policy Sciences (Journal) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 07:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Policy Sciences (Journal)

Hello Mi9cal,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Policy Sciences (Journal) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Policy Sciences

Please stop adding copyrighted and promotional material to Wikipedia. If you continue to recreate this article, I will block you from editing. Having said this, the journal seems to meet our inclusion criteria and an article on it could be created (at the correct title: Policy Sciences (journal)) IF it doesn't contain text from Journalguide.com or the Springer website. Please have a look at our journal article writing guide, where you can see how, even if you have a conflict of interest, you can create a neutral and encyclopedic article on an academic journal. I see that you yet again created this article, so I am yet again going to delete it. I will also ignore the comment on the talk page, but please read WP:AGF and WP:NPA. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 17:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whisperback

Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 18:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Canadian Political Science Review

The article Canadian Political Science Review has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources (tagged for sources since 5 years). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 18:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LAST WARNING

Your behaviour is now inappropriate for collaborative work on Wikipedia. If you refuse once more to understand our policies, and to sign your posts, you will be blocked - by me if I have to - without any further comment. Your personal attacks are already beyond the pale. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Canadian Political Science Review for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Political Science Review is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Political Science Review until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 18:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael P. Howlett

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael P. Howlett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/faculty/howlett-michael/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Randykitty (talk) 19:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I find it disappointing that even after our policies had been explained to you multiple times and I tried to give you some hints on how to write an acceptable article, you chose to re-create the same copyvio article yet again. I have blocked you for 24 hours to stop this disruption and give you time to time to reconsider. However, should you continue as you have today, you will face a much longer or even an indefinite block. --Randykitty (talk) 19:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Society of Policy Scientists

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Society of Policy Scientists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.policysciences.org/society.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randykitty (talk) 21:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 02:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]