User talk:Mhaot

CS1 error on Capital punishment by country

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Capital punishment by country, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:43, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at New Zealand First, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your source does not mention syncretic politics-gadfium 17:26, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Page of "Syncretic politics" has mentioned New Zealand First has a key example

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Syncretic_politics#Other_examples Mhaot (talk) 01:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plus a very similar party in Australia (Katter's Australia Party) is mentioned as Syncretic in Wikipedia

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Katter%27s_Australian_Party Mhaot (talk) 01:29, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing it out. An opinion piece is not a suitable source, and as I said before, it doesn't mention syncretic politics.----

Nomination of Radical pro-Beijing camp for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Radical pro-Beijing camp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radical pro-Beijing camp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Simonm223 (talk) 13:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing

Stop changing political party positions without consensus and sources. No sources state the Country Liberal Party is right-wing or even has a major social conservative wing. It is centre-right. The Northern Territory is not the same as other states and territories, as the only real factionalism there is in the Labor Party (Right vs Left, the former being by far more dominant, especially historically). Schestos (talk) 10:55, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tall Poppy Syndrome

Please stop removing sourced material from Tall Poppy Syndrome because of your personal experience. That's not an accepted basis for editing. The term may not be as prevalent in Canada than in Australia or New Zealand - or you may not have personally heard it- but it is in use as per multiple Candian sources dating back a number of years. You also seem to be making an assumption based on your generation. You may not hear it among Canadians in your peer group but it is commonly used among younger professionals and women in particular. Wellington Bay (talk) 10:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Under your argument then every English speaking country should be listed,

UK for example has various sources yet it is not added

https://www.cityam.com/it-is-time-britain-rid-itself-of-its-entrenched-tall-poppy-syndrome/

https://northwestbylines.co.uk/news/equality/tall-poppy-syndrome-the-price-ambitious-women-pay-for-success/

https://metro.co.uk/2023/08/03/are-you-suffering-from-tall-poppy-syndrome-at-work-19235480/

And even the USA

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/tall-poppy-syndrome#examples

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/law_practice/resources/law-practice-today/2024/may-2024/cutting-down-tall-poppy-syndrome/#:~:text=Tall%20Poppy%20Syndrome%20(TPS)%20occurs,effect%20on%20women%20of%20color.

This source has mentioned the TPS is mainly a prevalent as a Australia and New Zealand term

https://douggarland.com/pdf/america.pdf Mhaot (talk) 11:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Updated: At least you have founded a compromise Mhaot (talk) 11:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]