User talk:Metallic Lord

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Metallic Lord (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was banned by a racist, please have a less racial admin check this

Decline reason:

Alright, that's enough. The first request you made leaves no doubt you are a sock. The second pretty much requires that we leave this account blocked as permanently compromised (and you will understand us not trusting you when you say you've resecured your laptop, as really anyone could just say this and we really have no way of proving it, not for most users, not if we want to keep letting people edit to the degree of anonymity and privacy they prefer). So, with any real argument on your behalf now foreclosed, you turn to the last refuge of the NOTHERE: ridiculous arguments that seem intended to amuse others.

Well, we don't have to keep entertaining you and your friends. And now we won't. After I save this I will be revoking your talk page access, something that I have minimal compunction about doing when it is demanded, but that I haven't had to do for a few months. You can still request unblock for all the good it may do via the UTRS system (the revocation notice will link you to it) but you won't have whatever gallery you were playing to, just an audience of one. And I'm usually not privy to those discussions, but I am pretty sure they're like those little conferences you have probably had with a teacher out in the hall when your antics in the classroom got to be too much. Because believe me I've been on both ends of that conversation, and it's amazing how quickly all the wisecracking bravado dries up. But again I bet you'd know that, too. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:34, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 06:36, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Metallic Lord (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

bad block

Decline reason:

You are an admitted sock. Yamla (talk) 18:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Hammersoft: @Bishonen: @Jimbo: Metallic Lord (talk) 18:06, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So above you admit to being a sock [1], conduct an edit inline with the edit warring edits that the Southwestmetal account was doing, and your rationale for unblocking you is..."bad block"? Your actions are in violation of WP:BADSOCK. This unblock isn't for me to review, but I fail to see a reason to unblock this account. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:21, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's the same sort of thoughtless, unconstructive arguments Southwestmetal kept making. Sergecross73 msg me 20:43, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Metallic Lord (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My little brother got onto my laptop and made these changes. I've since secured the device to prevent this from ever happening again. It is now safe to unblock me Metallic Lord (talk) 21:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Mmm hmm. In that case, WP:COMPROMISED applies, and you might also want to read WP:BROTHER. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:06, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.