User talk:Merynancy

Welcome!

Hello, Merynancy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

But please read WP:NOSHARE - shared accounts aren't allowed; you need to get one each. You might want to read WP:USERNAME before choosing your new user name(s). Philip Trueman (talk) 16:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Keri Hilson - In a Perfect World

According to WP:record charts when different versions of an album or song chart the best way to show it is by including a note directly beneath the chart like in my edits and not by using asterisks like you did. Also the Italian chart you added was not sourced. Remember all info on wiki needs to be WP:verifiable Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Signature link

Hi, your signature link is the Italian Utente:Merynancy, perhaps your meant to use the English User:Merynancy. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 23:27, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Gypsy

It was explained to you before with In a Perfect World... that when different versions of a song or album appear on a chart you should use a note directly below the chart. You've changed the notes from Gypsy to a format that's incorrect. WP:record charts does clearly outline how charts are supposed to appear. In the interests of consistancy use the correct format in the future. :) Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

I disagree. Putting * next to the numbers or [a], [b] etc. is more messy. This way is uniform and consistant. Still if you think otherwise bring it up on the talk page for record charts.Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:59, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Achin' and Shakin'

Thank you for sourcing the Norwegian peak. I was going by the actual Norwegian charts website, here. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Diana Vickers

I saw that you warned 90.220... If you could, please WP:AGF. The reverts are happening because people aren't leaving civil comments explaining what they're doing, and not discussing. 90's style seems to be not to discuss very much, though he did respond to me fairly quickly when I asked a direct, polite question about his chart citations. That link you put back, with the Failed verification tag - I checked, and sure enough, it fails verification, and will always fail, as its "statistics" reports seem to come from users - correct me if I'm wrong. IMHO this justifies the removal which 90 did, but didn't document. So I do not think what 90 did can be correctly labeled vandalism. --Lexein (talk) 02:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. I saw the deletion of the entire citation along with the failed verification tag - that deletion does seem legitimate to me. It's rude when IP users don't leave edit comments, but the deletion itself, on its own, was valid, without regard to history. It's a citation with zero value for chart statistics. Please respond here - I prefer linear discussions. --Lexein (talk) 08:24, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Removing sourced material

Hi, I noticed you recently removed some sourced material from California Gurls, and I reverted your edit. If you remove sourced material because it is inaccurate, please discuss the change on the talk page first and provide evidence that this is the case. If the source does not actually support the statement to which it is attributed, you could use Template:not in source, or say so in your edit summary to avoid confusion. Thanks. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 12:30, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Merynancy. You have new messages at Giftiger wunsch's talk page.
Message added 15:04, 15 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

No Slovak chart archive?

Hi, I hope you can explain further your summary for this edit, where you said "slovak charts site has no archive". They go back to 2006 (which certainly covers the time period for Impossible (Shontelle song)). How is that not an archive? The singlechart template wouldn't produce a ref that didn't look like it'd endure. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 21:28, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

There is no link to archives, the link is the same for the week 20 of 2007, for the week 39 of 2008 and for all the other weeks. And the link I put is better: it has also the chart cronology of the song. ׺°”˜`”°º×ηυηzια׺°”˜`”°º× 21:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply, which I've copied above. There's a note in the generated ref about which chart to select; it's a simple instruction for a simple page, so it's hardly difficult for most users to verify the peak. Also, {{singlechart}} formats the reference in a standardized way with a full citation; you have provided a single long (ugly) bare URL which, even if you added the rest of a citation, and did it so that it matched the other refs, you'd have to do it that same way each time you added a Slovakian ref. And if you're going to do Slovakia that way, you'd probably better start doing Czech Republic, too.

Let's go back to the template version. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 21:52, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Easton Corbin

I saw you adding {{fact}} tags to Easton Corbin in regards to chart positions. Here's a similar discussion you might be interested in. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 15:13, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Keri Hilson

Hi there, I've noticed you've edited Keri Hilson articles before. Feel free to edit and help out on her new album's article No Boys Allowed and the single Pretty Girl Rock. ozurbanmusic (talk) 10:24, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Here

As I can't make edits anymore on it:wiki, can we talk here? Because there's more I wanna tell you... Lamsec (talk) 12:47, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

P. S. Please don't make me repeat it!

Reply

OK thanks Nowyouseemescreed 19:31, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Sì, va bene, ma allora non dovevo scriverlo? Su it:wiki c'è: {{avvisofirma}}. Lamsec (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Addio Nunzia. Lamsec (talk) 16:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Roll a D6

If you would like to redirect the article please discuss it on the talk page. While the stub is small, it has four sources, three of which are high quality RSes. thanks --Guerillero | My Talk 03:34, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Love on Top

Because Facebook is a social networking site, we can't use it as a source for Wikipedia. Read WP:RELIABLE. Oz ^talk 03:30, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Rejection of Nomination of Austin Mahone for deletion

The discussion you began regarding whether the article Austin Mahone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted has been rejected by Milowent. While you are free to make your nomination, you might consider withdrawing the nomination, which does not explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article if you wish to withdrawn the nomination, instead simply state as such in the discussion.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 18:54, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Mi sei piaciuta molto per i tuoi contributi...

Yardsspeak (talk) 16:26, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Twitter issue

As you had participated in the previous AfD, your views would be welcome here Talk:Use_of_Twitter_by_celebrities_and_politicians#Proposal_to_merge. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 16:25, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Merynancy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Merynancy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Merynancy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mariette Hansson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Please review the guidelines before nominating further articles for deletion

Please take a moment to review WP:BEFORE. It is your responsibility to check for possible sources before nominating an article for deletion. Lonehexagon (talk) 19:54, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sweet but Psycho, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 14:35, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

If you don't know what you did wrong, the article still used the Irish single chart template when you updated it, which links to irish-charts.com. That site has not updated. Irma.ie has, and you were clearly looking at irma.ie, so provide a link to that site in future like I just did, otherwise this is adding unsourced information. Thank you. Ss112 14:37, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

I have to laugh. ׺°”˜`”°º×ηυηzια׺°”˜`”°º× 17:25, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

You have to laugh at being warned for your apparent inability to provide a source, one of the most basic things there is to do on Wikipedia? Okay cool, well, I mean, if you want to continue to add unsourced information, I'll be happy to continue warning you until you receive a final warning and an administrator is alerted to this. Then you will have to explain to them why you can't. Maybe you won't find it so funny then? I know I will :) Ss112 05:01, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

It is funny because the source that was provided automatically by the template updates itself around two days after the IRMA website. There's no need to be so rude for such petty things, it's not like the information I added was fake. ×°˜`°×ηαη¢у×°˜`°× 08:54, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Doesn't matter, the information you added needs to be verifiable at the time you add it. That's what WP:V even says. Nobody else, if they checked, would know when that source was going to update and so therefore it's not proven by the source. Also, there's no assurance of when it will update. It doesn't "update itself"—it has to be done by people, and in the past it hasn't updated for several weeks. Ss112 12:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, Ruin My Life, concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the |access-date= parameter in the citation template. The |access-date= parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 05:01, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Imagine being that uptight. There are nicer ways to say things to less expert users, y'know. Plus, why use that inconvenient "source" when each song/album has its own disposable and accurate page on IFPI Czech Republic with the chart run? ×°˜`°×ηαη¢у×°˜`°× 08:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

If it's so inconvenient, why utilise it yourself? Why not change it entirely instead of updating just the number? Imagine being that lazy. Ss112 12:23, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Merynancy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Hello, I'm Dimsar01. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2018 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Please, understand that you DO NOT decide how the title of the song is written. —Dimsar01 ^Talk ⌚→ 21:37, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Before you leave random templates in people's talks, please read Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(music)#Capitalization. ×°˜`°×ηαη¢у×°˜`°× 23:17, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

FDR Charts & Tophit for KAZKA band

Hello Merynancy. (Sorry for my English.) Thank you for this text. But I'd like to talk about Tophit. It's Russian chart, and not Ukrainian. You can not add it. Yes, the site show info about Ukraine and Kiev, but it's not always correct. The song 'Svyata' was very popular in Ukraine, but not in Russia. And Tophit shows that the song had only #183. For Russia -- yes, but not for Ukraine. And FDR Charts shows TOP-40 of Ukraine. This company started in 1998 (see screen 2002) and works now. I don't understand why users delete it. Even if you don't want to use FDR, use Tophit is not correct. Thank you. P.S. Ukrainian TV channel MusicBosxUa shows info about TOP-40 of FDR. Do you think that the channel shows incorrect info? -- QAtlantic.mn, 16:34, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Kazka

Hello. Thank you for your leaving me a message on my talk page. I read carefully now on WP:Charts and found out that there isn't added any official charts website about Bulgaria so I'm not gonna add again, even though Kazka was number 1 on Bulgarian radios. But, I would please you to read carefully the greek source as it seems you don't know how the greek charts work. Kazka's song "Plakala" in english, ("Cry") was released by the greek label Panik Records and since then have entered the charts. Airplay Greek charts have an official source, that is IFPI Greece. Thank you Αντρέας Δέλτα (Talk) 15:56, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

This is not a reason to be ignored just because the official website of IFPI Greece does not provide an archive for each category every week. Since they provide an archive and the website of Airplay Charts writes their official source is IFPI then I don't see any other reason. It won't be added again by me, but this is wrong. Thanks again for this discussion. --Αντρέας Δέλτα (talk) 16:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anna Odobescu

The article Anna Odobescu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 22:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Small Talk (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Graveyard (Halsey song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, Torn (Ava Max song), concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the |access-date= parameter in the citation template. The |access-date= parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 19:24, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi!

I have to disagree on your "little sense" comment. Conceptions of scientificity vary between cultures, so De divinatione is a source for that of Ancient Rome. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 12:03, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Inre Ritornelli

-). Ciao! --151.52.254.197 (talk) 17:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Oops... the truth hurts!!! Kids? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.38.94.117 (talk) 20:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. I'm obviously not reporting you for anything, but I mentioned your name, so I thought it good practice to let you know on here. YorkshireLad  ✿  ^(talk) 21:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi!

Haha, is it funny? Didn't you see who made the page? I am not the author! The author of this page is the editor User:Silver seren/Userpage --I love Istanbul (talk) 14:29, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

@I love Istanbul: and what about it? The page's correct title is currently SALTed due to persistent spamming. The page was created with a different title in order to bypass the block, which is against the guidelines. ×°˜`°×ηαη¢у×°˜`°× 14:30, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Every good editor with good edits is responsible for what he writes and edits, and no one has the right to prevent him from writing! What is your problem with me I do not understand! --I love Istanbul (talk) 14:34, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

@I love Istanbul: please understand that the page was deleted and protected from creation, so it should in no ways be recreated under a different title. ×°˜`°×ηαη¢у×°˜`°× 14:36, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

"Izvestia" source

Hi Merynancy. I noticed you are reverting this supposedly Izvestia source https://vk.com/doc52225181_469044403?hash=b09e2aaa122cd88833 or https://www.mediafire.com/file/c35g8obixs2it46/240618IzvestiaMusic.pdf/file. I was having my own concerns with this source, but I was wondering if you have conclusive evidence that it is fake or something. --Muhandes (talk) 09:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)