User talk:Meherpila

December 2022

Hello, I'm Wesoree. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gandabahali without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wesoree (Talk) 14:29, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Draft:Ramgarh Hill, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Meherpila! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 11:53, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move rejected draft articles to mainspace, as you did at Draft:Ramgarh Hill, you may be blocked from editing. This article submission was rejected. It needs further work. Belbury (talk) 21:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Draft:Ramgarh Hill. Belbury (talk) 09:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Gandabahali. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. The image_map infobox field is for images of maps, not for skyline photos. Belbury (talk) 15:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ramgarh Hill moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ramgarh Hill, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, currently you have zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ramgarh Hill moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ramgarh Hill, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:16, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramgarh Hill (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Facebook is not a reliable source, and you cannot use documents uploaded into the Google Drive as sources. Therefore, effectively unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramgarh Hill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Meherpila! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ramgarh Hill moved to draftspace again

Your draft submission was declined with some feedback. That means you should consider the feedback, amend the draft and resubmit it, not that you should move the draft into mainspace unchanged. Belbury (talk) 12:46, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use of multiple accounts

Hello, Meherpila, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Iptesh Kumar Meher (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 12:53, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 14:15, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]