User talk:MehdiAlireza

Welcome!

Hello, MehdiAlireza, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorials
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Aigogy, from its old location at User:MehdiAlireza. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 20:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Timtrent. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:17, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the reviewer had not any clue or knowledge about education and AI concepts and I could not qualify their reviews! Please notice this concepts demonstrated in UNESCO technical meeting and will explain more in the next meetings on December 18th Nanjing, China MehdiAlireza (talk) 23:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aigogy (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aigogy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MehdiAlireza! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aigogy (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Chaotic Enby were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I strongly doubt that the homepage of https://www.gov.uk sources anything about this learning framework.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aigogy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aigogy (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is not going anywhere. We do not accept AI generated articles nor drafts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aigogy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:15, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please notice this concepts demonstrated in UNESCO technical meetings and will explain more in the next meetings on December 18th Nanjing.

Obviously, the text improved by LLMs but not the term! as you know the terms is unique and registered on my name in some recent conferences! MehdiAlireza (talk) 23:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not interested in any work that is LLM generated. The irony should not be lost on you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not talking about personal interests! About international reality (AI era include LLMs!) and terms! MehdiAlireza (talk) 23:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Aigogy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Aigogy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete and review again! MehdiAlireza (talk) 23:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, MehdiAlireza. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, UNESCO will clarify more in the near future! Obviously, Wikipedia is about definitions not advertisements include names! MehdiAlireza (talk) 23:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice conversation to clarify folks about AI era! MehdiAlireza (talk) 23:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When the block expires and you're interested in participating in a project to write and maintain an encyclopedia without using AI, please have a look at the Task Center or the community portal for constructive ideas. If you're not interested, that's okay, there are many other websites on the Internet. If you continue promoting yourself and your AI concepts, you may be re-blocked without automatic expiry. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting! Sure, you will learn how AI will change everything! Even your vision and Wikipedia! MehdiAlireza (talk) 23:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:MehdiAlireza, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MehdiAlireza|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:34, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, I am not working for any company to write in Wikipedia any advertising or whatever as in Academic and International environment it is not a reference like IEEE!

I am curious about Wikipedia vs AI, patents law updates and symbiosis law and impacts for future! :)

Thanks MAL111 (talk) 11:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are promoting your own brand, thus I believe you receive a benefit, broadly construed. Please revise your answer with special reference to this brand name and also your own research which you have highlighted. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Receiving benefits from an own business is a financial conflict of interest but not paid editing. It's okay; the situation is quite obvious and doesn't need additional disclosure. More advertising leads to a block, that's all. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh guys, I see! You mean my name?! Okay you can remove it and make it better! It was a draft and symbiosis practice for AIGOGY term!No problem, you can eighter remove my name or even that term! My target is not Wikipedia or such terms anymore, resolving this kind of issues like patent registration using AI is a headache Internationally now!

So fell free to add AIGOGY term and make it better not under my name!

Thanks MAL111 (talk) 19:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the term AIGOGY and the papers under your authorship. AIGOGY is a non notable neologism and some sort of commercial entity. Your purpose here seems to be to promote this. This is why you are blocked at present 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:33, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pedagogy Andragogy Heutagogy Cybergogy etc. Methodologies! MAL111 (talk) 01:14, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay guys, I am wondering to write AIGOGY Methodology page or make it better According my previous definition or other Methodology like pedagogy, Andragogy, cybergogy etc.

Thanks MAL111 (talk) 01:19, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile, AIGOGY is important in Education industry and thanking in advance for any help! MAL111 (talk) 19:17, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh guys, I see! You mean my name?! Okay you can remove it and make it better! It was a draft and symbiosis practice for AIGOGY term!No problem, you can eighter remove my name or even that term! My target is not Wikipedia or such terms anymore, resolving this kind of issues like patent registration using AI is a headache Internationally now!

So fell free to add AIGOGY term and make it better not under my name!

Thanks MAL111 (talk) 19:14, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AIGOGY

)

MAL111 (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Language preferences?

Hi MehdiAlireza, which language(s) do you read and write the most fluently? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:39, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]