User talk:Meghangini

January 2023

Hello Meghangini. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Meghangini. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Meghangini|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Meghangini, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Meghangini|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir,

I am not being paid and I am not a paid editor.I am a beginner from Odisha,India. Aiming to work for the wikipedia related to odisha people as I have a great interest on this.I have read almost all wikipedia related to Odisha people.I am trying to edit and work on the topics which are under article for creation and in draft phase.I am doing a research on notable people of Odisha, Past present and future.I would request with great humility kindly dont block my account. Meghangini (talk) 17:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to respond to your block in the correct format and in the correct section. Please read the links Guide to Appealing Blocks first 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhab Chandra Jena (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

You have made a wholly negative improvement. Please read and act upon what has been said before

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Meghangini! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhab Chandra Jena (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Immediate resubmission with no changes. Doing this is really rather rude. Do it again and I predict the draft will be rejected (0.95 probability)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:27, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Omkrishnajena per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omkrishnajena. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 21:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]