User talk:Meenu Makan

Hello, I'm Deli nk. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. [1] [2] [3] Deli nk (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snap Print & Design (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources. Citations should be properly formatted (see WP:REFB). Not all the content can be considered encyclopedic (neutral tone is required) and greater sourcing will be necessary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Snap Print & Design and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Snap Print & Design, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 06:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Meenu Makan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 06:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021: Wikipedia isn't the place to promote Snap Printing

Hi Meeru. It seems that your article contains a substantial amount of text copied from https://www.snap.com.au/history-of-snap.html. Wikipedia is not intended as a mirror of your business's website, as Wikipeddia is not for promotion. By placing your website content in the article you wrote, you violated international copyright law, as well as Wikipedia's requirement to paraphrase sources. I have removed the copied material from your article: [4].

Further, any article in Wikipedia must be about a notable subject. A business must meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for businesses. Sources must be reliable, published, independent, secondary and in depth. Writing must be dry and factual; we call this encyclopedic writing. Story-telling style is inappropriate.

Good luck, but if your company doesn't meet the above criteria, you would be wasting your time trying to get an article about it into Wikipedia.--Quisqualis (talk) 01:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021: Undisclosed paid editing is not allowed on Wikipedia

Hello Meenu Makan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Meenu Makan. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Meenu Makan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Quisqualis (talk) 20:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- thanks for you comment I have added my employer details on my user page now, could you please check and let me know if they are correct.Meenu Makan (talk) 05:00, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the details you added are correct, so thank you. As mentioned previously, please review the notability criteria for companies and organizations. Significant coverage from multiple reliable third-party sources is required for a company to be considered worthy of inclusion. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:52, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [5] MrOllie (talk) 02:46, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrOllie I have edited the link again as this blog is relevant to the Wikipedia page, can you please review this. Also there is a reference page that is in the blog how an I add this to the citation?

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. [6] MrOllie (talk) 01:36, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then can you please justify this contribution - Ingram, Karin. "10 Of The Best Australian Logos". Kwik Kopy. Retrieved 25 September 2020. I have only added the link to the blog - https://bestinau.com.au/the-evolving-landscape-of-corporate-logos-in-australia/ that talks about how the logo for the ABC company has evolved

Concern regarding Draft:Snap Print & Design

Hello, Meenu Makan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Snap Print & Design, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]