User talk:Mediascriptor

Mediascriptor, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mediascriptor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Embassy of Antigua and Barbuda, Madrid (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please make substantial changes BEFORE re-submitting! Thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Embassy of Antigua and Barbuda, Madrid and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Embassy of Antigua and Barbuda, Madrid, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 07:46, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Embassy of Antigua and Barbuda, Madrid

Hello, Mediascriptor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Embassy of Antigua and Barbuda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Squeeps10 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 01:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Antigua and Barbuda

You are invited to participate in WikiProject Antigua and Barbuda

The goal of WikiProject Antigua and Barbuda is to improve the quality and quantity of information about the country on Wikipedia.

Join here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Antigua and Barbuda/Participants

CROIX^talk 16:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Croix and happy new year. Thank you for your invitation. Happy to help. Mediascriptor (talk) 12:59, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Antigua.news moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Antigua.news. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, happy new year :). Is it possibile that you checked a previous version of the page I created? I already amended the page making it as neutral as possible. The page only states facts by mentioning the sources in each paragraph, which are all authoritative newspaper articles (Financial times, Reuters, etc.). Could you please check the latest version please?

This is the link: Draft:Antigua.news

Thank you in advance. Mediascriptor (talk) 12:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antigua.news (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CSMention269 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:WEBCRIT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antigua.news and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 05:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI

Please see WP:COI. If you have an affiliation with Antigua.news, Dario Item or other subjects you are interested in, you should disclose this by following the steps outlined in WP:DISCLOSE. Thanks, Gitz (talk) (contribs) 12:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gitz, thank you for your message and happy new year. I am only interested in improving the quality and quantity of information about the Antigua and Barbuda on Wikipedia. I received an invitation in joining the WikiProject Antigua and Barbuda and I am now working on a different subject. Thanks. Mediascriptor (talk) 13:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to hear that, but please note that WP:COI is not about your good faith and personal motives (such as improving the quality and quantity of information about the Antigua and Barbuda). Even if you have no ulterior motives, you should disclose any significant relationship with the subject of an article you intend to edit. For example, you can make a statement in the edit summary of any COI contribution or use the template {{connected contributor}}. This will not prevent you from improving the article but will help ensure the editing process is fairer and more transparent. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 15:49, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Even if I am just member of the WikiProject Antigua and Barbuda? In case I will update the categories and make a statement regarding my membership.

I saw that you reviewed the page of Antigua.news. Do you recommend further imporovements? (I noticed the edit of the footnote about the journalist of the Financial Times. I will amend it in order to be more precise). Thanks Mediascriptor (talk) 16:07, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, being a member of a WikiProject does not create a COI. A COI is created only by an external relationship with the subject. You don't need to disclose any personal information: just use common sense: if you have a significant off-Wiki relationship with the subject, please make it clear. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 16:14, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]