User talk:Mcshiny

Erik Bakalar

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Erik Bakalar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart Clayton

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Stuart Clayton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CJIHC.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CJIHC.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:54, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Peterborough Islanders.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Peterborough Islanders.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nottingham Lions.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nottingham Lions.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Liverpool F.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Possum (talk) 19:07, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Manchester United F.C.. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Ged UK (talk) 19:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 72 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Talk 20:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Jza84 | Talk 20:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Logo enl.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Logo enl.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Bob Geldof, you will be blocked from editing. Skomorokh 11:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mcshiny! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 97 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Neil Adams (ice hockey) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rick Fera - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Daryl Harper, you will be blocked from editing. Dr Aaij (talk) 20:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Newcastle ENL Vipers

The article Newcastle ENL Vipers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable second string ice hockey team.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NtheP (talk) 19:21, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Peterborough Islanders.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peterborough Islanders.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grimsby Red Wings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grimsby Red Wings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grimsby Red Wings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SportingFlyer T·C 18:07, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]