User talk:MbIam9416

السلام علیکم برادر ۔ مجھے ویکیپیڈیا استعمال کرنا نہیں آتا لیکن ماشاءاللہ آپ کی اس محنت کو دیکھتے ہوئے آپ کے گوش گوار یہ بات کرنا ضروری سمجھی ہے کہ لفظ Mir تنولی قوم کے کسی نواب یا خان کے ساتھ نہیں ہے۔ آپ اس پر مطالعہ کر لیجئے ۔ اور ان ناموں کے ساتھ Mir ہٹا دیجئے۔

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.255.6.105 (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, MbIam9416, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 20:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Your recent editing history at Amb (princely state) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This includes your edits as an IP, so you should be blocked if you reinstate this unsourced material. Doug Weller talk 20:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I said in an edit summary, sources must be in the article - see the links above

Doug Weller talk 20:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Thanks for contributing to the article Amb (princely state). However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Suba Khan Tanoli

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Suba Khan Tanoli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://mundigak.com/en/2019/04/11/how-a-veteran-of-abdalis-indian-invasions-laid-the-foundations-of-kps-oldest-princely-state/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pupsterlove02 talk • contribs 18:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Indo-Pakistani War of 1947, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Please do not delete content based on WP:OR arguments; use the talk page if necessary and obtain WP:CONSENSUS. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Tanoli, you may be blocked from editing. McKhan ^(talk) 05:27, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mir Nawab Khan Tanoli

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mir Nawab Khan Tanoli, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. βӪᑸᙥӴ • Talk • Contribs 19:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Safiullah khan Tanoli moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Safiullah khan Tanoli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Mir Painda Khan

added a link pointing to Hazara

Suba Khan Tanoli

added a link pointing to Hazara

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mir Nawab Khan Tanoli moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mir Nawab Khan Tanoli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 19:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amb (princely state), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli

The article Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a father does not establish notability per WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:36, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Third Battle of Panipat. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – NJD-DE (talk) 00:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am to sorry here but he make a Vandalism on page . I just Reverted history back. MbIam9416 (talk) 01:09, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to communicate with them. No matter if the edits are correct or false, reverting each other like this is no good behavior. No matter who is right here, in the end both of you might be blocked for disruptive editing and edit-warring.

In case communication (on a talk page, not the edit summaries) doesn't lead anywhere, then consider the edit-warring noticeboard as a venue to resolve your dispute. – NJD-DE (talk) 01:16, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I Try to Talk him about matter and i also told him that :-Haughton Just take a look on book Imperial Gazette of India Page 218 , and Tanoli Volume and Tarekh- hazara page number 314-436 , Al-Afghan Gulham Nabi Khan Page 36-46 this book in English Reference and make you clear everything .I don't create Vandalism but he edit or reverted again and again to support Vandalism and fit wrong information. MbIam9416 (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also talk with Hangouts but he not showing me response MbIam9416 (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Second Anglo-Sikh War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Your original edits may have been made in good faith, but you should be aware that:

The lead paragraph of an article should be a summary of its main body. It is not the place to include novel or unrelated information;
The citations you have supplied do not support your assertions. The link to the Imperial Gazette of India makes no mention of the persons or events you describe, while the link to the anjabdigilib.org site returns a blank page;

Your additions therefore are neither verifiable nor notable, given their complete absence from all other sources quoted. You have repeatedly reinserted your disputed text without discussing these objections, going so far as to call attempts to discuss then as vandalism, which is far from civil. This edit war has gone on long enough. Your next reversion will be reported to the admins. HLGallon (talk) 15:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your next reversion will be reported to the Admins for edit war on Third Battle of Panipat and Battle of Amritsar (1757).

The citations you have supplied do not support your assertions. The link to the Kaushik Roy makes no mention of the persons or events you describe which you deliberately used as citation by copying from the existing sources in the article, while the link to the letter, not in English, is not a source that can be considered reliable;
Article from archive.org is not in English and cannot be used as proof if you are sincerely making the correct claim. Find a translated version. Also worldcat.org is not a reliable source either and has no mention of the claim you made;

Your additions therefore are neither verifiable nor notable, given their complete absence from all other sources quoted. You have repeatedly reinserted your disputed text without discussing these objections, going so far as to call attempts to discuss then as vandalism, which is far from civil. This edit war has gone on long enough. HaughtonBrit (talk) 12:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Third Battle of Panipat, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 16:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Battle of Amritsar (1757) while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

published this page someone who know information can add more citation MbIam9416 (talk) 15:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Refs like "Letter of Mughal emperor Muhammad Shah" and "Gaining Information from Citizens of that area." fail Wikipedia:Verifiability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MbIam9416! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, none of the given sources are verifiable. The article is not written in an objective encyclopedic tone (with unacceptable phrases such as "which was very important state", "Due to his rapid increase in Power day by day" and "he was very cooperative and loyal to his tribe").

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli (June 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli.

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission.

It should be noted that the reviewer has not decided that the topic is not notable. An article on the topic may be accepted in the future. However, there is no reason to think that this draft will become an article, and there is evidence that this draft will never become an article. If there is to be an article on this topic, this draft must first be blown up and started over.

If this draft is resubmitted without discussion and without starting it over, or if an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection by starting over, a partial block or a topic-ban may be requested against the submitting editor.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

There is now a version of this article in article space. If the article is kept, this draft can be redirected.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:36, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jalal Baba

Just letting you know, an IP is reverting your edit in May to Jalal Baba without explanation. I'm waiting to see if they start explaining in edit summary before stopping myself, but just thought I'd let you know. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:22, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:This image was the ruler of Amb State and with the ruler of State of Swat in 1926. During he sent army on Battle Chamla.jpg

Hello, MbIam9416. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:This image was the ruler of Amb State and with the ruler of State of Swat in 1926. During he sent army on Battle Chamla.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:This image was the ruler of Amb State and with the ruler of State of Swat in 1926. During the British Raj on India.jpg

Hello, MbIam9416. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:This image was the ruler of Amb State and with the ruler of State of Swat in 1926. During the British Raj on India.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Singularity42 (talk) 17:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency)

The article Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient notability for this cryptocurrency. Draft:Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency) already in existence, so no point in draftifying again.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 18:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency)

The article Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After draftification, originator simply created another copy of article in article space rather than discussing with reviewer or with community.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Singularity42 (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dogecoin, you may be blocked from editing. –DMartin 07:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency). –DMartin 07:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 07:18, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli

Hello, MbIam9416. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:20, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli

Hello, MbIam9416. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muhammad Bahadur Khan Tanoli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Xiasi Inu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Xiasi Inu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Singularity42 (talk) 12:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 10:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is MbIam9416. Thank you. Fram (talk) 10:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MbIam9416 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blooked 3 years ago of creating page about crypto currency I was unaware and acknowledged the mistake i am a geographer , research and historian, i request you to please unlock

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new comments at the bottom. What edits do you want to make? 331dot (talk) 08:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add research on Suba Khan Tanoli page a 17th century ruler MbIam9416 (talk) 13:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you don't intend to further edit about crypto? 331dot (talk) 19:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, i acknowledge MbIam9416 (talk) 05:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

still waiting to be unblocked, i want to add historical research MbIam9416 (talk) 09:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]