User talk:Maxframe

Dorothy McEwen

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Dorothy McEwen, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.digitalresearch.biz/Dorothy.McEwen.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 07:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have submitted our official page from Digital Research on Dorothy McEwen granting full use under our Digital Research - MaxFrame Corporation Copyright.

Dorothy McEwen

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Dorothy McEwen, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.digitalresearch.biz/Dorothy.McEwen.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 07:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status of Dorothy McEwen

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Dorothy McEwen. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.digitalresearch.biz/Dorothy.McEwen.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author (full permission is granted by the author, Jim R. Benfer Jr., for use in WikiPedia and I (Jim) was the author of the original information published at www.DigitalResearch.biz on Dorothy McEwen) leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Dorothy McEwen with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Dorothy McEwen with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Dorothy McEwen saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. — madman bum and angel 07:36, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy McEwen

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dorothy McEwen, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.digitalresearch.biz/Dorothy.McEwen.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 04:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy McEwen

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dorothy McEwen, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.digitalresearch.biz/Dorothy.McEwen.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dorothy McEwen

A tag has been placed on Dorothy McEwen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Abecedare (talk) 08:03, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories‎. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 08:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced negative or controversial biographical material to pages, as you did with this edit to Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. [mad pierrot][t c] 08:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add unsourced negative or controversial biographical material, as you did with this edit to Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories. [mad pierrot][t c] 09:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please take the time to discuss proposed changes on the talk page. Brothejr (talk) 09:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of edit warring in the edits you want, please go to the talk page and discuss with the other editors and reach a consensus on the edits instead of just re-adding the information/comments. Thank you. Brothejr (talk) 09:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Abecedare may be offensive or unwelcome. In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Please stop commenting on user's person pages. Each time they have been moved [1] [2] [3], and you have been warned already [4]. [mad pierrot][t c] 16:16, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maxframe. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User Maxframe's conduct. Thank you. [mad pierrot][t c] 16:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article probation

Please be aware that all Barack Obama related articles (including Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories) are on article probation and any editor being disruptive on the pages can be blocked from editing. So please discuss any issue you may have with these articles on the concerned article talk page instead continuing to edit-war. Abecedare (talk) 19:14, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]