Jump to content

User talk:Rudhnoroth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Matthew Approval)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Approval Studio (July 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Matthew Approval! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 07:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Matthew Approval. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 08:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Approval Studio (August 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Noahfgodard were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noahfgodard (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Approval Studio (September 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Information icon

Hello Matthew Approval. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Matthew Approval. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Matthew Approval|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 16:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Response

[edit]

Hi Theroadislong. Sorry, I have not checked the page for a while. I can see why the article was declined several times, yet I do not receive any compensation for this Wikipedia entry. The tool I am writing about I use myself as I am working in the sphere of design project management approving the assets before they go to production. I find the tool very useful and wanted to share information about it, so this is probably why it is very hard for me to look impartial (plus, it is my first article). I guess I'll check more guides on how to write on Wikipedia, as in the future I would like to add more to the design proofing topic overall, not only to this article. Thanks for your comments! Matthew Approval (talk) 19:18, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Approval Studio

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Matthew Approval. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Approval Studio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Approval Studio

[edit]

Hello, Matthew Approval. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Approval Studio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Approval Studio (June 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 09:29, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Approval Studio

[edit]

Hello, Rudhnoroth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Approval Studio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]