User talk:MathKeduor7/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:MathKeduor7. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Your submission at Articles for creation: James Maynard (mathematician) has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
— Earwig talk 18:30, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Proposed deletion of Arnold Mathematical Journal
The article Arnold Mathematical Journal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 11:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For starting the "Treatise on Light" page. Walter William Weimar Wime Jr. (talk) 07:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, MathKeduor7. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, MathKeduor7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MathKeduor7, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
–Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 14:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Okay, I remove the legal threats. I won't make any legal process. I am crazy, sorry. MathKeduor7 (talk) 14:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
MathKeduor7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please? MathKeduor7 (talk) 6:23 am, Today (UTC−8)
Decline reason:
I'm going to go ahead and alter the block. You seem either unwilling or unable to follow some of the most basic core policies, and frankly your remarks in the last 24 hours give me no confidence whatsoever that it is a good idea for you to be editing here, legal threats or not. You've had this account for nine years, but were unaware that using multiple accounts the way you have been doing is not permitted. You demanded to be granted a user right that doesn't actually do anything besides help others, and basically tried to blackmail someone into granting it to you, and then, after all that, you also made a legal threat. Put that all together and it paints a picture of someone who simply isn't suited for a collaborative environment like this. Any future unblock request will need to address these broader issues, in detail, if it is to have any chance of success. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:56, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
If your mental disorder(the term you used) prevents you from following Wikipedia guidelines or makes it difficult for you to participate here, you will unfortunately have to remain blocked until you are able to conduct yourself properly here. Protecting Wikipedia is the top priority here. 331dot (talk) 14:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for talking to me. I can control it, but I need the medications, and I lost my job... Aristab, depakote, lithium, etc, etc, etc... All cost A LOT OF MONEY. I am requesting the state to pay them for me. I had a consultation with a psychiatrist by Skype today and he will give me free samples of some of the most important medications. Please unblock me? MathKeduor7 (talk) 16:36, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
I give my word
@Beeblebrox: @331dot:
I will behave properly and not cause problems. MathKeduor7 (talk) 16:51, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Please trust me. MathKeduor7 (talk) 16:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
I love Wikipedia. MathKeduor7 (talk) 16:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Please review the guide to appealing blocks if you wish to appeal again. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- I truly hope that you are able to get the help you are seeking; I might suggest you focus on that for now. Wikipedia is not going anywhere. 331dot (talk) 20:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words... You are a good person. MathKeduor7 (talk) 20:51, 11 July 2020 (UTC) Please could change my block time to one year? I will be back and edit more good things... MathKeduor7 (talk) 20:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC) And please could "hide" my accounts and problems? oversight? MathKeduor7 (talk) 20:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
And if it's not asking much:
https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:MathKeduor7&oldid=966975806
I need to sleep. It takes me away from hypomania. Cya. Please? I beg. MathKeduor7 (talk) 20:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
(I want this to be my user-page... Plz)
Please reduce block time to 1 year.
...
Portuguese check-users will never find my ten accounts, I have multiple IPs. MathKeduor7 (talk) 15:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
I WON'T BYPASS THE BLOCK, although I could edit the Russian Wikipedia (I know Russian), and use a Russian proxy, and you would never know it's me. MathKeduor7 (talk) 15:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Спасибо!
@David Eppstein: You are the best admin, please tell your opinion. MathKeduor7 (talk) 15:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrb_oNtik1E
"A influência da geometria sobre as ciências físicas foi enorme. Como exemplo, quando o astrônomo Kepler mostrou que as relações entre as velocidades máximas e mínimas dos planetas, propriedades intrínsecas das órbitas, estavam em razões que eram harmônicas — relações musicais —, ele afirmou que essa era uma música que só podia ser percebida com os ouvidos da alma — a mente do geômetra." source: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometria
- You need to submit a proper unblock request, addressed to all admins, sincerely apologizing and agreeing to abide by whatever rules you were breaking. And even then, it's not clear who will believe you. Blocks are not punitive, against you; they are protective, for the encyclopedia. If you are going to wait out a year and then return to the same behavior, then it should not be reduced. On the other hand if you really were going to reform, then a year would be too long; if you could reform at will, you could do so immediately. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:22, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'll do that. I just need to recover emotionally. MathKeduor7 (talk) 16:42, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks again. MathKeduor7 (talk) 16:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Unblock request
MathKeduor7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please, I swear to God (and I believe in Him) that I will behave properly and make good edits. MathKeduor7 (talk) 12:53 pm, Today (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
Commentary above about using multiples IPs and "I COULD proxy if I wanted" doesn't inspire confidence. only (talk) 17:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please
I beg. Please unblock me. Give me a second chance. MathKeduor7 (talk) 07:18, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Maybe a 14 day trial? MathKeduor7 (talk) 07:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Please, I LOVE Wikipedia. MathKeduor7 (talk) 07:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
I beg. MathKeduor7 (talk) 07:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
MathKeduor7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Maybe a 14 day trial? MathKeduor7 (talk) 07:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your actions here show you have to focus elsewhere other than Wikipedia. Please, please, please! Go get better. Once you are better, come back and request an unblock under WP:UTRS. You can do it, but you can't do it right now. I very, very strongly suggest waiting at least six months and strongly advise UTRS to reject any unblock request made within the next three months, because it takes time for medication to kick in and to tune the dosage and to get everything figured out. I say all of this without prejudice. Your mental health is important and I have revoked your talk page access in the same way I'd revoke a registration in a marathon from a person with a broken ankle. Take your time, go get well, and then come back and request an unblock. Yamla (talk) 10:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I promise I will create 25 good articles. MathKeduor7 (talk) 07:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
One warning, though. Any further violations of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE, even one, may result in your ban under WP:3X. So, please, don't go down that road. --Yamla (talk) 10:34, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Fantoches
Por favor, desculpem-me pelos fantoches: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_MathKeduor7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MathKeduor7 (talk • contribs) 07:34, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
UTRS 41528 has been accepted
UTRS appeal #41528 has been accepted.
Based on constructive editing on Port. Wiki,and after discussion with blocking admins, I am happy to unblock. Welcome back. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)- Thank you very much. I won't disappoint the community again. MathKeduor7 (talk) 20:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)