Jump to content

User talk:DavidHuai1999

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Masdggg)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wang Zonghua has been accepted

[edit]
Wang Zonghua, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 01:14, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:蔡跃东

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Masdggg. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:蔡跃东, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 04:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No: sources come first. But I'm tired of your reverts, which are followed by nothing helpful (a link to a TV program appearance, that means nothing) and have sent the article to AfD. Drmies (talk) 18:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot remove the category on Gene Lau

[edit]

Please pay attention next time 邻家的王子 (talk) 14:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

DavidHuai1999 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 92.38.189.137. I am from Mainland China, Wikipedia has blocked in Mainland China, so I have to use VPN to access it. 風雲北洋 WPEnglish is very difficult 6:33 am, Yesterday (UTC−4)

Accept reason:

IPBE granted for one month. If all is well and user is unable to edit upon expiry then they can seek an extension of IPBE for perhaps 1 year. The user may ping me when IPBE expires for a review, which will be renewed if there are no concerns or issues that arise during the trial period. IPBE will also only be renewed if it is evidenced by the user that it is required. Should I be unable to answer their request then another admin may do so by the user using the unblock template on their talk page as they’ve done here. Note future admins may take a different view than I’ve taken in any future decision. NJA (t/c) 14:36, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Acupuncture shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Roxy, the dog. wooF 18:34, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Acupuncture topics

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kingofaces43 (talk) 19:28, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DavidHuai1999 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 45.79.105.73. I am from Mainland China, Wikipedia has blocked in Mainland China, so I have to use proxy. 風雲北洋 WPEnglish is very difficult 18:12, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please follow the procedure explained at WP:IPECPROXY. Huon (talk) 19:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pinging NJA who granted IPBE earlier. Huon (talk) 20:00, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seems resolved, N.J.A. | talk 12:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]