User talk:Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist

Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022

Hello, I'm Vacant0. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to New Communist Party of Yugoslavia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Vacant0 (talk) 13:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Yo finally another communist on Wikipedia

I am a fellow Communist and Stalinist. I also consider myself a Christian Socialist. I agree with your views regarding revisionism. Στάλιν και παραλλαγή (talk) 21:43, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

It's a pleasure to meet you, too. I am confident that you will continue to make positive and beneficial contributions to Wikipedia.Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist (talk) 21:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Quick question about the USMLO

Hello. I noticed that on the Hoxhaism article you removed the US Marxist-Leninist Organization because you said it was inactive. I'm not disputing this; I'm just curious if you have a source for them disbanding other than the fact that their website hasn't been updated since Feb. 2020. I like the keep track of US leftist groups. Thanks, Bulbajer (talk) 06:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Destructive editing with the term "anti-revisionist"

Wikipedia defines anti-revisionism as:

"Anti-revisionism is a position within Marxism–Leninism which emerged in the 1950s in opposition to the reforms of Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev. Where Khrushchev pursued an interpretation that differed from his predecessor Joseph Stalin, the anti-revisionists within the international communist movement remained dedicated to Stalin's ideological legacy and criticized the Soviet Union under Khrushchev and his successors as state capitalist and social imperialist."

Marxists.org's "Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line" defines anti-revisionism as:

"Historically, in the Communist lexicon, the term “anti-revisionism” has been used to describe opposition to attempts to revise, modify or abandon the fundamentals of revolutionary theory and practice in a manner that was perceived to represent concessions to Communism’s adversaries."

I imagine that you are well-adjusted with the "anti-revisionist" movement given your name, so you should know that no communist groups posit themselves as "anti-revisionist" as a term, they only oppose revisionism. For example, in no works of Enver Hoxha or Mao Zedong will you find the term "anti-revisionist". And, if you are looking for secondary sources, there may be some descriptions of the Party of Labour of Albania as "anti-revisionist", but for small groups, this is an impossibility, especially in English. For example, the only source using the term "anti-revisionist" for the Communist Party of Mexico (Marxist–Leninist) is Wikipedia itself. Yet, based on their publications, they are objectively anti-revisionist; they are against revisionism as laid out by the two definitions above, and thus they are, indeed, anti-revisionist.

On the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist), there is plenty evidence that they fit these definitions. I will give a short excerpt from their founder and leader, Hardial Bains, written in his last book "Modern Communism", which is touted by CPC(M-L) as "the truth of what CPC(M-L) stands for".

"Following the death of J.V. Stalin, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union under Khrushchev changed the general line of the Communist Party altogether, declaring 'peaceful competition' between socialism and imperialism. The CPSU under Khrushchev initiated a kind of competition to see who could issue the filthiest slanders against the name and work of Stalin, against socialism and the progress of society. In the name of exorcising the ghost of Stalin, or presenting communism 'with a human face,' these revisionist parties too espoused dogmatism based on anti-communist Cold War presuppositions, declaring the edifice of socialism, the theory of scientific socialism and the principles of Marxism-Leninism to be null and void."

"Contemporary Marxist-Leninist Thought is the summation, taken in general form, of the experience of the application of Marxism-Leninism to the conditions of socialist revolution and socialist construction, and to the struggle against modern revisionism and capitalist restoration."

These clearly prove that, at present, CPC(M-L) is oriented against revisionism, that is, they see Marxism-Leninism as the summation of experience, conditions and the struggle against revisionism. Therefore, they are indeed an "anti-revisionist" party and I hope that you disengage with destructive editing of CPC(M-L)'s page as well as pages such as the Peruvian Communist Party (Marxist–Leninist), which have been arbitrarily removed from "anti-revisionism" as an ideology. Justsomeguy3484 (talk) 14:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Look, what you're arguing is not the opinion of politicians or political experts, but the independent opinion of the CPC (M-L). Also, its own sources cannot be backed up by Wikipedia articles.Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist (talk) 10:05, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern re: user page policy

Hello there. I recently noticed some of your contributions and stumbled upon your user page, which I saw you have already spent a lot of time expanding. I wanted to draw your attention to Wikipedia's user page policy, specifically the section on "excessive unrelated content", as the section of your user page about your political ideology ventures into soapboxing territory. Per Wikipedia policy, you shouldn't be including divisive polemics detailing which ideologies and historical figures that you support or oppose, as this is unrelated to the project of building an encyclopedia and would be better suited for a personal blog.

Consider that you may be working on this project with many people that disagree with you, and that publicly denouncing so many as "reactionaries" only contributes to preventing the formation of consensus and turning the project into an ideological battleground. Given that your contributions all appear to be constructive and in good faith, I have no reason to believe that you intend to engage in disruptive editing, so that's why I'm bringing this to your attention - in hopes of mitigating any potential disputes.

Let me know if you would like to know any more information or if there's anything I can help you out with. Cheers and take care. -- Grnrchst (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

LGBT identity politics

Why are you think that LGBT identity activists hurt the working class? Pomchi-Inu87 (talk) 13:43, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Look, I don't answer unless it's about my editing. Feel free to think on your own.Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist (talk) Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist (talk) 15:33, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Red Brigades

Hello. It seems to me that the ideologies "Stalinism" and "anti-revisionism" are inappropriate: the Red Brigades were not very strict on ideological questions and included extreme left-wing activists of quite diverse tendencies, including anarchists or members of the "new left". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Latterne (talk • contribs) 11:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm responding to your question. First of all, the Red Brigades were adhering to Marxism-Leninism from the beginning, rejecting and criticizing other theories. They also criticized revisionism, including Khrushchevism, and they stuck to Stalinism and advocated anti-revisionism. Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist (talk) 12:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

And the founders of the Red Brigade were Stalinists, and it was a Marxist-Leninist organization from the beginning. It also consistently criticized and rejected Trotskyism, anarchism and other theories as opposed to what you mentioned. Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist (talk) 12:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Trotskyism, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 13:39, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Revolutionary Organization 17 November. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- Grnrchst (talk) 11:09, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist

User:Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Grnrchst (talk) 20:18, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)