Jump to content

User talk:Martin.tinku510

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Martin.tinku510! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User:Martin.tinku510/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SpencerT•C 06:27, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 14:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Martin.tinku510/sandbox has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Martin.tinku510/sandbox. Thanks! Eagleash (talk) 14:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 05:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

[edit]

Information icon Plase do not remove decline notices. It clearly states "do not remove this line" (do not change this to the article title again either), The decline notices form part of the review system and provide information for any subsequent reviewers. The date template is {{Use dmy dates|date=xxxx}}. It will not work if written otherwise and it should not show on the rendered page. See Template:Use dmy dates. Please read all the links with which you have been provided and it may not be a good idea to submit the 'draft' again until it is more like a usable article. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 05:50, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chocolate Room (October 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eternal Shadow were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eternal Shadow Talk 21:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chocolate Room (October 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 08:47, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Chocolate Room has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Chocolate Room. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chocolate Room (October 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 13:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chocolate Room (October 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.


This draft reads like an advertisement, but Wikipedia is not for advertising.

This draft still reads like an advertisement, especially the History section. The submitter has not yet answered the question about conflict of interest.

The subject establishment may or may not be notable, but this draft will never satisfy Wikipedia's policies.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:24, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Chocolate Room

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Martin.tinku510. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Chocolate Room, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]