User talk:Marlaytoday

This is Marlaytoday's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cecilia Benattar (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Beachweak was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cecilia Benattar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Beachweak (talk) 01:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Beachweak,

Thank you so much for reaching out and offering your support. I have resubmitted a new and improved draft on Cecilia Benattar and am hopeful that it meets the necessary criteria this time. I really appreciate your guidance and advice regarding my previous submission, and it has been invaluable in making improvements.

Could you kindly check on the resubmitted draft for me? Your expertise and feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Looking forward to hearing from you!

Best regards,

Marlaytoday Marlaytoday (talk) 17:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for taking the time to adjust your draft.

Taking a quick look over everything, the prose seems much better (although the Legacy section could still use some work). The main issue with the article as it stands is establishing notability. As per WP:NBIO and WP:BASIC specifically, "people are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject". As of your current revision, the article only cites one source (and a bunch of Wikipedia guidelines, which it does not need to do).

If you can find multiple, reliable sources that are independent about the subject that discuss Cecilia and can be used to back up the points in the article, this can definitely be published. One source alone does not establish notability. Beachweak (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marlaytoday! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Beachweak (talk) 01:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]