User talk:Marcpallot

Welcome!

Hello, Marcpallot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 16:33, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:EARfig1.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:EARfig1.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:EARfig1.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:EARfig1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 17:05, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't bother people who try to kindly contribute in editing new entry pages into wikipedia that cannot be perfect right from the beginning as it is also supposed to be a place for co-authoring articles. Furthermore, it is not a copyright violation as I'm the main author of the previous article published into an online newsletter which was used into this Living Lab entry page. Even I thought to have included a reference to it before I find time to refine properly this wikipedia Living Lab page and find other people to contribute to it. In conclusion, I don't appreciate the way you operate in removing this page (except if it is a 1st of April joke) without even contacting people editing this page by email or other means...... Marc Pallot (talk) 18:44, 1 April 2010 (CET)

Update regarding copyright concern on Living lab

Since we do not yet have verification of permission by the processes set out on the article's face and sufficient time has passed since the placement of the notice, the article has been restored to the last version before the problematic content was added for copyright concerns. The deletion of this content is not necessarily permanent. If you have already sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) and GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (if you are not the copyright holder or have co-authored the material, release under CC-BY-SA-compatible license alone is sufficient), the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed by the Wikimedia Communications committee. Likewise, if you have not yet sent a letter, you still may (or resend it, if you believe your original may have been lost), and the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed.

As Wikipedia does not require proof of identity on account creation, it is essential that we receive external proof of authorization in order to ensure that we remain compliant with US Copyright law. It is also essential that we verify that copyright holders understand the extent of the release they are authorizing, in that our licenses permit modification and reuse in any forum, even commercial publication, as long as authorship credit is maintained and future copies are compatibly licensed.

Please note that once permission is verified, the material may be evaluated and altered to meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Although we appreciate donations, we cannot guarantee that material donated will be retained.

Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]