User talk:Mambomo

This is Mambomo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brakanah 44 (March 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:56, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mambomo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:56, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is it because he is black Mambomo (talk) 18:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was rejected because it has zero reliable independent sources, so zero evidence of passing WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 18:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

but we have the imdb is independent you could take time and read what the site gave of his works.... Mambomo (talk) 18:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb is user edited, see WP:IMDb the site is considered unreliable by a majority of editors. Theroadislong (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What about the famous birthday link still does not stand as evidence Mambomo (talk) 19:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is a blog/user edited, which says it uses Wikipedia, FaceBook, Youtube, Twitter, Spotify, Instagram, Tiktok and IMDb as it's sources, none of which are suitable here, sorry. Theroadislong (talk) 19:32, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh i placed the knowledge panel link is that allowed. Am still new so am learning from you and from my understanding knowledge panels are automatic Mambomo (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that's allowed, but it doesn't help at all with passing the criteria at WP:GNG I'm afraid. Theroadislong (talk) 19:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, Mambomo. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created Draft:Brakanah 44 has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people. Please see Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mambomo, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Kamaru44 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Kamaru44 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kamaru44. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 09:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]