User talk:MaloneyW.F.C

Welcome![edit]

Hello, MaloneyW.F.C, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Giant Snowman 12:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Infoboxes[edit]

Please stop removing the → from loan signing in infoboxes. Please refer to WP:FOOTY's manual of style on player articles. Cheers, --Jimbo^[online] 13:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I'd like to point out the above. --Jimbo^[online] 13:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Slocombe[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Martin Slocombe, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.bathcityfc.com/slocombe.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:04, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scott Brice (footballer)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Scott Brice (footballer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fails both WP:NOTE and WP:ATHLETE

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Trevor Marron (talk) 13:11, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kyle Critchell. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kyle Critchell, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kyle Critchell, you will be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Scott Brice (footballer)[edit]

I have nominated Scott Brice (footballer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Brice (footballer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Trevor Marron (talk) 22:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Matt Thorne (footballer)[edit]

I have nominated Matt Thorne (footballer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Thorne (footballer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 17:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Matt Thorne (footballer). If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 19:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryan Harrison (footballer)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ryan Harrison (footballer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Player fails WP:ATHLETE as has never played in a fully-pro league.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Giant Snowman 11:47, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martin Slocombe (footballer)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Martin Slocombe (footballer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Player fails WP:ATHLETE as has never played in a fully-pro league.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Giant Snowman 11:51, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weymouth players[edit]

You might be a bit puzzled as to why you are getting a series of messages about deletion nominations. The longstanding consensus on articles for footballers is that generally speaking, non-league players do not merit articles. Sometimes confusion arises because some players currently in non-league have articles. However, these players have typically have articles because they have played League football in the past. Players who have spent their full senior career in non-league do not generally have articles. Hope this helps. Oldelpaso (talk) 11:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dean Grubb[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dean Grubb, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Player fails WP:ATHLETE as has never played in a fully-pro league.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Giant Snowman 11:53, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dean Smith (Footballer)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dean Smith (Footballer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Player fails WP:ATHLETE as has never played in a fully-pro league.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

Proposed deletion of Hector Mackie (footballer)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hector Mackie (footballer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Player fails WP:ATHLETE as has never played in a fully-pro league.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Giant Snowman 11:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matty Hale[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Matty Hale, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This person has never played or managed in a fully-pro league, and so fails WP:ATHLETE

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Giant Snowman 11:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martin Slocombe[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Martin Slocombe, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ATHLETE having never played in a fully professional league. Unreferenced WP:BLP, no sign of other notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. – Toon 16:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Crittenden.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Crittenden.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 12:30, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes[edit]

Hi, just to let you know that players' infoboxes are only for clubs they're actually contracted to, not if they're just on trial. Likewise, the appearances and goals are only for league games for their contracted clubs, not cup games or friendlies. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Weymouth F.C. Reserve Team 2009 - 2010[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Weymouth F.C. Reserve Team 2009 - 2010, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BigDom (talk) 14:51, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Weymouth F.C. Trailists 2009 - 2010[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Weymouth F.C. Trailists 2009 - 2010, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BigDom (talk) 14:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox stats[edit]

Hi, please note that the appearances and goals in footballers' infoboxes count for the domestic league only, thus excluding other competitions. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 21:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kyle Critchell. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weymouth F.C. season 2009–10[edit]

Please don't remove maintenance tags from articles without doing the work requested. Thanks--Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Weymouth F.C. season 2009–10[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Weymouth F.C. season 2009–10, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weymouth F.C. season 2009–10. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – Pee Jay 13:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kyle Critchell. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 11:33, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ian Hutchinson (footballer born 1972)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ian Hutchinson (footballer born 1972), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Hutchinson (footballer born 1972). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:20, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes[edit]

Hello. When you update footballers' infoboxes, please would you also update the date field (pcupdate =) when you do the stats. This will display the date and time when the stats were correct, so it's misleading if they get out of synch. The easiest way is to replace the existing contents of the pcupdate field with ~~~~~, which the software will automatically turn into the current date and time. thanks, Struway2 (talk) 23:18, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie McGuinness[edit]

Hi, why did you remove the fact that Jamie McGuinness is on loan from Rushden & Diamonds in the Weymouth squad section? --Jimbo^[online] 15:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any particular reason, or are you just going to keep ignoring me? --Jimbo^[online] 13:46, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can do, but common practise and consensus is to add an "other" parameter to the squad for additional deatails i.e. if they're on loan, captain, player/manager etc, so I will still be adding the details in the fs template. Why are you so against it anyway? --Jimbo^[online] 17:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's for players out on loan only as they don't have anyone in on loan. Seems to me a case of JUSTDONTLIKEIT. --Jimbo^[online] 18:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

McGuiness fails WP:ATHLETE so it would more than likely be deleted. As I stated before, just because you don't like something, that is not a valid reason for deleting it. If you look at WikiProject FOOTY's manual of style template for football clubs, it clearly includes the loan in brackets in the fs template. Oh and one last thing, after leaving a message sign it by typing ~~~~ at the end. Thanks, --Jimbo^[online] 23:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you go ahead and remove content after I have showed you policies and guidelines that support my reasoning? --Jimbo^[online] 23:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree entirely with Jimbo on this issue. Please read all the links that have been provided above and below. I realise you may not be familiar with how wikipedia works, but repeatedly removing this info is disruptive and will inevitably lead to admin intervention. Barret (talk) 23:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Weymouth F.C., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Barret (talk) 20:20, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Weymouth F.C., you will be blocked from editing. Barret (talk) 00:28, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weymouth F.C.[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Weymouth F.C.. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Barret (talk) 19:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it appears you are ignoring the above notice. Could you explain why you keep removing this [1] information from the current squad section of this article? If you look at other football club articles, this is the standard way to include additional info about the players. I am trying to assume you are unaware of wikipedia policies and are making these edits in good faith but your failure to enter into discussion with other editors is rather poor etiquette. Barret (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Gill[edit]

Hello. Last night you deleted the career stats table and the references section from the Jerry Gill article. You may have noticed the words "Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a <references/> tag" in big blue and red print at the bottom of the page after your last edit. I'm assuming this was a mistake, but please could you be more careful another time. Thanks, Struway2 (talk) 09:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Date of last update in infoboxes[edit]

Hello. When you update Weymouth player stats in the infobox, please will you also update the "correct as of" date at the same time. This is easily done by typing five tildes ~~~~~ in place of the existing date at pcupdate= (or club-update= in the new infoboxes). If you don't, it means the stats are misleading to the reader: it'd be pretty silly to have an infobox saying someone had played 10 games for a club as of a date before he even joined them. There are notes in most of the Weymouth player infoboxes reminding editors about this, so persistent failure to do so could be considered as disruptive editing. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Please don't remove the recentism tag from the Weymouth F.C. article without providing a valid reason or at least attempting to resolve the problem that the template refers to. Thanks. Barret (talk) 18:12, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any particular reason why you have removed this tag again? The history of the club from 1890 to 1987 any forms only tiny part of this section -- it is clearly slanted towards the past couple of seasons. Barret (talk) 13:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing privileges have been suspended indefinitely[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Since you are apparently uninterested in abiding by Wikipedia's policies or practices, I have removed your editing privileges. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MaloneyW.F.C (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It was accicdental mistake on my part and i do follow the rules of wikipedia closely sorry.

Decline reason:

I've looked through your editing history for the last year and I cannot accept that the long list of contentious edits I see, and the many occasions upon which you have been requested to follow policies that you've ignored, is in any way an "accidental mistake". Accounting4Taste:talk 22:53, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is there any chance of me getting back onto wikipedia in the future then?

You will probably need to use the {{unblock}} template again if you want to gain attention from an administrator. However, I suggest you read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks first and make a more convincing case for the reinstatement of your editing privileges. Barret (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MaloneyW.F.C (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Over the last couple of hours i have checked over all the rules and regulations of wikipedia as an encyclopedia and will from now on obide strictly to the rules of it. When doing this i looked espeically at the editing conditions and now fully understand your reason for this block. I hope from this i can be unblocked and use wikipedia without having any problems in the future thanks.

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block. Sandstein 07:09, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MaloneyW.F.C (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Over the last couple of day's i have checked over all the rules and regulations of wikipedia as an encyclopedia and will from now on obide strictly to the rules of it. When doing this i looked espeically at the editing conditions and now fully understand your reason for this block. I hope from this i can be unblocked and use wikipedia without having any problems in the future thanks.

Decline reason:

This is the exact same request except you changed "hours" to "day's". This still does not address the reason for your block. Smashville^talk 14:42, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MaloneyW.F.C (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Over the last few days i have double checked over all the wikipedia rules including editing which seems to be my major problem. I hope that you can reinstate me onto your site and hopefully you will have no further problems with me or Weymouth F.C.

Decline reason:

I am not able to verify from this which rules you have read, or what your plans are for editing differently in the future. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Ollie Tribe[edit]

The article Ollie Tribe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ATHLETE having never appeared in a fully-professional league

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Barret (talk) 13:37, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{dated prod}} As the player could well be soon moving into the higher leagues of english football so i thought i could start his page now. Any chance of letting me develop more as the season goes on?.

He has only just broken into the Weymouth team so there is no guarantee this player will be moving up to a professional league. At present he fails notability guidelines so the article will most likely be deleted. Another article you created (Simon Radcliffe) has been nominated for deletion for the same reason. Please remember to sign your posts in the future. Barret (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok thats fair enough thanks for the help and i now fully understand why after reading the regulations and will not attempt this in the future.

You have been advised again and again for almost a year now ... what's going to change suddennly now? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:19, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]