User talk:Jimbo online

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Archives

Current talk
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
Archive 5

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

You were in a discussion which is relevant to a RfC I started see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing#RfC: Flag icons in professional boxing record tables 92.237.211.110 (talk) 05:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grays Athletic season article

Hi Jimbo, Ihave moved this back as it was restored to your user space so you could work on it to show non routine coverage ssatisfying GNG. I presume that you moved it by mistake given that you have done nothing on it and that I am wrong in assuming your sole reason for requesting Userfication was to wait until you thought it had been forgotten about before moving it iIto the main space. Please do not move back without significant sourced additions of a non routine nature. Fenix down (talk) 22:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, No I moved it back having looked at every other season article going (from 2009–10, before and since) and couldn't find anything which makes them more or less relevant GNG-wise, especially those less referenced from the same season or just lists of stats with little to no prose. I don't understand your bias as to why you'd think the Grays Athletic article is any more or less notable than the Mansfield Town one of the same season? Also, if somebody contests a PROD having it gone past its 7-day period or not, should it not be discussed via AfD? I'm going to move it back again, and I think you should set this up for discussion properly, rather than your own personal opinion trying to force rule. Thanks --Jimbo^[online] 09:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you can clearly see here, you made promises to add additional sources to help meet GNG. You have made no effort to do this, but have simply moved back into the mainspace. Given that you have made no attempt to do what you said it is difficult to believe that your original request for userfication was made in good faith. As such, I will not restore any articles to your userspace in future. Fenix down (talk) 10:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just haven't had the time to yet, I don't spend every waking hour on Wikipedia mate. I noticed you've avoided my question about other articles of similar levelled clubs. --Jimbo^[online] 16:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So you shouldn't have moved it into the main space simply because you haven't had time. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is never a good reason for or against deletion. You should probably also be aware that if the consensus is to delete then there is little reason for a version to remain in your user space either. Fenix down (talk) 19:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Using OTHERSTUFF is a lazy cop out especially for an admin, I've been around Wikipedia long enough to know the ways people get their own way. You've stated with more non-routine coverage it'll meet GNG so it can stay in my userspace until then, thanks. --Jimbo^[online] 18:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2009–10 Grays Athletic F.C. season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2009–10 Grays Athletic F.C. season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009–10 Grays Athletic F.C. season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 10:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Grays Athletic F.C. squad

Template:Grays Athletic F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. JMHamo (talk) 00:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Colin Lippiatt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colin Lippiatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Lippiatt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 09:44, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jimbo online. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Grays Athletic F.C. squad

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Grays Athletic F.C. squad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 14:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grays ath.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grays ath.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jody Banim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jody Banim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jody Banim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Monty (talk) 21:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Statement

In a discussion on an AFD you state: " had a bit of a search around and could find anything significant to merit WP:GNG" Please can you give examples of what would be "significant", at the lowest level. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galesbury (talk • contribs) 02:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Current squads

Could you please direct me to said discussions? The latest I was aware of is that Template:Football squad player2 is preferred, as it meets WP:MOSFLAG and is more accessible on mobile devices. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:09, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer it as well. It's at Talk:Grays Athletic F.C.. --Jimbo^[online] 18:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Football Squad Player Nationalities

Hey Jimbo - hope you're doing excellently?

I've noted your close curation of certain football clubs pages, particularly around current players, in recent months, deleting where you think they're not up to date, and removing nationalities for those players who don't have an individual Wikipedia page. First up, well done for all your good work.

Out of interest, what do you think would give justification for a players nationality, where they don't have their own Wiki page? And how should that be incorporated into the squad lists? I understand this will probably link to Wikipedia policy, but I want to make sure we're all working from the same place before you feel tempted to get busy with that 'undo' button!

Look forward to hearing from you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.70.162.157 (talk) 23:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not specifically those without individual Wikipedia pages, just those that are unsourced. Otherwise, it constitutes as WP:OR. Walton Casuals F.C. and Billericay Town F.C. are both sourced/referenced. --Jimbo^[online] 21:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo - Re Whitehawk FC. I followed your advice on sourcing squad sources - and listed 9 references, as advised above with Walton Casuals and Billericay, yet you deleted the nationalities again, which I find puzzling - hence my undo.

Your sources need to be reliable as per WP:RS. --Jimbo^[online] 16:15, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo - Re Whitehawk FC. Nationalities clearly listed on club website in player biogs, as advised with Billericay, yet you have once more deleted them. Unsure why you keep doing this, but I have undone again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrse12 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo - Re Wealdstone FC. All Nationalities are clearly listed on club website/FM18 and Football manager websites. Once more you have deleted them. I am unsure as to why you keep doing this so someone else on behalf of the club has undone this. Any more removal of this and the club information will be removed by myself. Craigw87 (talk) 09:45, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Craigw87[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jimbo online. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing flags,

Can you please stop, and explain yourself, what conensus are you on about? Nationalities are worked out by going to the club websites! So whatever your reason for removing them is incorrect. Govvy (talk) 23:26, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Player nationalities are verified by external sources, if you continue with this false consensus you will be reported. Govvy (talk) 23:44, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not if their nationalities are no where in the external sources. You're just assuming. See WP:OR, WP:CS and WP:R. --Jimbo^[online] 18:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to St Albans City F.C., did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. This is your first warning please stop being disruptive. Govvy (talk) 19:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wingate & Finchley F.C.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Govvy (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jimbo online. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grays Thurrock F.C.

Hi Jimbo, I noticed that there is a redirect, which you created, for Grays Thurrock F.C. that points to Grays Athletic. I'm in the process of expanding the Frank Burton article so have been trying to unpick this a little. Michael Joyce's book has Burton joining Grays Thurrock. This would have been in 1925, and they were definitely different clubs at least at this point. There are articles in the BNA about the establishment of the Grays Thurrock club around this time, and reports of both Grays Thurrock and Grays Athletic competing as distinct entities in the Kent League. It may be that they merged together at some subsequent point, but there is no mention of this in the Grays Athletic article. I'm therefore wondering about the appropriateness of the redirect (and the inclusion of Burton in Category:Grays Athletic F.C. players). Is there any further light you could shed on this? Many thanks, Nzd (talk) 14:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a bit more research and also spoken with @Ureinwohner (see here). They are unquestionably different clubs and I don't see any connection to Grays Athletic at all (other than that they groundshared for some time). I've started an article – Grays Thurrock United – and am currently fixing the relevant player links that I find. Thanks, Nzd (talk) 17:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. They were two separate entities. --Jimbo^[online] 15:34, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antonio Valencia (boxer)

The article Antonio Valencia (boxer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, fails WP:NBOX as a pro as he's never even fought for a regional title.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 23:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

= Hello, I'm RossButsy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Daniel Jebbison have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks.

Proposed deletion of István Kecskés (boxer)

The article István Kecskés (boxer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journeyman boxer with no claim to notability. Clearly fails WP:NBOX, with only two wins in 24 fights as a pro. Searching amateur-boxing.strefa.pl for his name does not bring up much, so we can safely assume he doesn't pass NBOX as an amateur either. Would be interesting to know who reviewed this in the first place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 21:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Bonson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Bonson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Bonson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

².O.^Boxing 20:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Franklin Egobi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franklin Egobi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franklin Egobi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

².O.^Boxing 21:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alex Ibbs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Ibbs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Ibbs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

².O.^Boxing 20:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patrick Wilson (boxer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrick Wilson (boxer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Wilson (boxer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:51, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Saint Lucian boxers

A tag has been placed on Category:Saint Lucian boxers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:41, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ernest Champion

The article Ernest Champion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable footballer

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Nice work Jimbo, most impressive. James Kevin McMahon (talk) 06:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shervon Jack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shervon Jack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shervon Jack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grays edit

How is my edit "disrupting Wikipedia to make a point"? On the RM postcode area page, the town of Grays itself is only listed in the RM17 section. Samuel J Walker (talk) 19:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]