User talk:Malinaccier
Deletion review for Miskin Abdal
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Miskin Abdal. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HeritageGuardian (talk • contribs) 22:10, June 18, 2024 (UTC)
213.249.241.140
[edit]Please re-block 213.249.241.140 for vandalism. Twillisjr (talk) 00:58, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Rollback rights request
[edit]@Malinaccier: Hello, I am writing regarding my request for Rollback rights submitted on 25 October 2024 ([1]). I provided the requested clarification on the same date concerning a rollback action you queried.
I noticed today that there has been no follow-up on either the request or the clarification. I fully appreciate that real-life obligations and the complexities involved in evaluating requests may cause delays. However, I would be obliged if you could provide some clarity on the current status. Thank you. QEnigma (talk) 18:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).
- Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
- Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.
- Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068
- RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
- The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.
- An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
[edit]Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Storm Prediction Center meso-gamma mesoscale discussions (2nd nomination): It was my understanding that of the four editors in the discussion, three were in favor of the deletion of the article. I was told to bring this here and get your input before taking this to deletion review (I had previously began a new AfD less than two hours after closing). I'd just like your input on the whole matter. Cheers! Departure– (talk) 18:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Departure, thanks for reaching out. My reading is two people arguing to keep the article, two people arguing to delete the article---I am not sure how you get three in favor of deleting the article. There is good discussion about whether the list is original research or not, but there is just not a clear consensus in either direction. I stand by my close of no consensus. I think if you open a deletion review that it will not change anything, but you are welcome to. I hope that helps. Malinaccier (talk) 14:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)